592
Views
47
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Between places and flows: towards a new agenda for neighbourhood research in an age of mobility

&
Pages 95-108 | Published online: 10 Nov 2016

References

  • Allan, G. and Phillipson, C. (2008): ‘Community studies today: urban perspectives’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11 (2): 163–173.
  • Allen, J. P. and Turner, E. (2009): ‘Ethnic residential concentrations with above-average incomes’, Urban Geography 30 (3): 209–238.
  • Alpheis, H. (1990): ‘Erschwert die ethnische Konzentration die Eingliedrung?’ [Does ethnic concentration make assimilation more difficult?], in Esser, H. and Friedrichs, J. (eds): Generation und Identität: theoretische und empirische Beiträge zur Migrationssoziologie [Generation and identity: theoretical and empirical contributions to the sociology of migration]. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp. 147–184.
  • Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (2002): Cities: Re-imagining the Urban. Polity, Cambridge.
  • Andersson, R. (2001): ‘Spaces of socialization and social network competition: a study of neighbourhood effects in Stockholm, Sweden’, in Andersen, H. T. and Van kempen, R. (eds): Governing European Cities: Social Fragmentation and Urban Governance. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 149–188.
  • Arthurson, K. (2012): Social Mix and the City: Challenging the Mixed Communities Consensus in Housing and Urban Planning Policies. CSIRO, Collingwood, VIC.
  • Atkinson, R. and Kintrea, K. (2000): ‘Owner-occupation, social mix and neighbourhood impacts’, Policy and Politics 28 (1): 93–108.
  • Beal, J. (2002): ‘Globalization and social exclusion in cities: framing the debate with lessons from Africa and Asia’, Environment and Urbanization 14 (1): 41–51.
  • Beaverstock, J. V. (2002): ‘Transnational elites in global cities: British expatriates in Singapore's financial district’, Geoforum 33 (4): 525–538.
  • Beaverstock, J. V. (2005): ‘Transnational elites in the city: British highly-skilled inter-company transferees in New York City's financial district’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (2): 245–268.
  • Bertolini, L. and Dijst, M. (2003): ‘Mobility environments and network cities’, Journal of Urban Design 8 (1): 27–43.
  • Bestor, T. C. (1989): Neighborhood Tokyo. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
  • Bissell, D. (2013): ‘Pointless mobilities: rethinking proximity through the loops of neighbourhood’, Mobilities 8 (3): 349–367.
  • Blokland, T. (2003): Urban Bonds: Social Relationships in an Inner City Neighbourhood. Polity, Cambridge.
  • Blokland, T. (2008): ‘Gardening with a little help from your (middle class) friends: bridging social capital across race and class in a mixed neighbourhood’, in Blokland, T. and Savage, M. (eds): Networked Urbanism: Social Capital in the City. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 147–170.
  • Böcker, L. (2010): Mobilities of business travel: exploration into the occurrence, experience and performance of travel situations. Master thesis, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
  • Bolt, G. and Van kempen, R. (2013): ‘Mixing neighbourhoods: success or failure?’, Cities 35: 391–396.
  • Boschman, S., Bolt, G., Van kempen, R. and Van dam, F. (2013): ‘Mixed neighbourhoods: effects of urban restructuring and new housing development’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 104 (2): 233–242.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986): ‘The forms of capital’, in Richardson, J. G. (ed.): Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, New York, pp. 241–258.
  • Brooks-gunn, J., Duncan, G. J. and Aber, J. L. (eds) (1997): Neighborhood Poverty, vol. 1: Context and Consequences for Children. Russell Sage, New York.
  • Brophy, P. C. and Smith, R. N. (1997): ‘Mixed-income housing: factors for success’, Cityscape 3 (2): 3–32.
  • Burgess, E. W. (1925): ‘The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project’, in Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W. and Mckenzie, R. D. (eds): The City. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 47–62.
  • Bygren, M. (2013): ‘Unpacking the causes of segregation across workplaces’, Acta Sociologica 56 (1): 3–19.
  • Castells, M. (1996): The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Clammer, J. (1997): Contemporary Urban Japan: A Sociology of Consumption. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Clark, W.A.V. (2006): ‘Race, class, and space: outcomes of suburban access for Asians and Hispanics’, Urban Geography 27 (6): 489–506.
  • Couclelis, H. (2009): ‘Rethinking time geography in the information age’, Environment and Planning A 41 (7): 1556–1575.
  • Cummins, S., Curtis, S., Diez-roux, A. V. and Macintyre, S. (2007): ‘Understanding and representing “place” in health research: a relational approach’, Social Science and Medicine 65 (9): 1825–1838.
  • Cresswell, T. and Merriman, P. (eds) (2011a): Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects. Ashgate, Farnham.
  • Cresswell, T. and Merriman, P. (2011b): ‘Introduction: geographies of mobilities – practices, spaces, subjects’, in Cresswell, T. and Merriman, P. (eds): Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects. Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 1–15.
  • De souza briggs, X. (1998): ‘Brown kids in white suburbs: housing mobility and the many faces of social capital’, Housing Policy Debate 9 (1): 177–221.
  • Ellen, I. G. and Turner, M. A. (1997): ‘Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence’, Housing Policy Debate 8 (4): 833–866.
  • Ellis, M., Holloway, S. R., Wright, R. and East, M. (2007): ‘The effects of mixed-race households on residential segregation’, Urban Geography 28 (6): 554–577.
  • Enchautegui, M. E. (1997): ‘Latino neighborhoods and Latino neighborhood poverty’, Journal of Urban Affairs 19 (4): 445–467.
  • Ettema, D. and Kwan, M.-P. (2010): ‘The influence of social ties on social and recreational activity participation of various ethnic groups in the Netherlands’, paper for the 12th World Conference on Transportation Research, Lisbon, 11–15 July.
  • Faist, T. (2000): ‘Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 23 (2): 189–222.
  • Firman, T. (2004): ‘New town development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region: a perspective of spatial segregation’, Habitat International 28 (3): 349–368.
  • Fischer, C. S. (1982): To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Fong, E. and Gulia, M. (1999): ‘Differences in neighborhood qualities among racial and ethnic groups in Canada’, Sociological Inquiry 69 (4): 575–598.
  • Forrest, R. (2008): ‘Who cares about neighbourhoods?’, International Social Science Journal 59 (191): 129–141.
  • Friedrichs, J. (1998): ‘Ethnic segregation in Cologne, Germany, 1984–94’, Urban Studies 35 (10): 1745–1763.
  • Friedrichs, J., Galster, G. and Musterd, S. (2003): ‘Neighbourhood effects on social opportunities: the European and American research and policy context’, Housing Studies 18 (6): 797–806.
  • Galster, G., Andersson, R., Musterd, S. and Kauppinen, T. M. (2008): ‘Does neighborhood income mix affect earnings of adults? New evidence from Sweden’, Journal of Urban Economics 63 (3): 858–870.
  • Gans, H. J. (1962): The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans. Free Press, New York.
  • Giddens, A. (1984): The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity, Cambridge.
  • Glick schiller, N., Basch, L. and Blanc-szanton, C. (1992): ‘Transnationalism: a new analytic framework for understanding migration’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 645: 1–24.
  • Graham, E., Manley, D., Hiscock, R., Boyle, P. and Doherty, J. (2009): ‘Mixing housing tenures: is it good for social well-being?’, Urban Studies 46 (1): 139–165.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973): ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380.
  • Gregory, D. and Urry, J. (eds) (1985): Social Relations and Spatial Structures. Macmillan, London
  • Guest, A. M. and Wierzbicki, S. K. (1999): ‘Social ties at the neighborhood level: two decades of GSS evidence’, Urban Affairs Review 35 (1): 92–111.
  • Hajer, M. and Reijndorp, A. (2001): In Search of New Public Domain: Analysis and Strategy. NAi Publishers, Rotterdam
  • Hall, P. (2002): Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. 3rd edn. Blackwell, Malden, MA.
  • Hannam, K., Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006): ‘Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings’, mobilities 1 (1): 1–22.
  • Hazelzet, A. and Wissink, B. (2012): ‘Neighborhoods, social networks, and trust in post-reform China: the case of Guangzhou’, Urban Geography 33 (2): 204–220.
  • Hatz, G. (2009): ‘Features and dynamics of socio-spatial differentiation in Vienna and the Vienna Metropolitan Region’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 100 (4): 485–501.
  • Henning, C. and Lieberg, M. (1996): ‘Strong ties or weak ties? Neighbourhood networks in a new perspective’, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 13 (1): 3–26.
  • Hogan, D. P. and Kitagawa, E. M. (1985): ‘The impact of social status, family structure, and the neighborhood on the fertility of Black adolescents’, American Journal of Sociology 90 (4): 825–855.
  • Hoyt, H. (1939): The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. Federal Housing Administration, Washington, DC
  • Hutchinson, S. (2000): ‘Waiting for the bus’, Social Text 18 (2): 107–120.
  • Iossifova, D. (2009): ‘Blurring the joint line? Urban life on the edge between old and new in Shanghai’, Urban Design International 14 (2): 65–83.
  • Janelle, D. G. (1973): ‘Measuring human extensibility in a shrinking world’, Journal of Geography 72 (5): 8–15.
  • Jargowsky, P. A. (1997): Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City. Russell Sage, New York
  • Johnson, D. L. (2002): ‘Origin of the neighbourhood unit’, Planning Perspectives 17 (3): 227–245.
  • Joseph, M. and Chaskin, R. (2010): ‘Living in a mixed-income development: resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago’, Urban Studies 47 (11): 2347–2366.
  • Jupp, B. (1999): Living Together: Community Life on Mixed Tenure Estates. Demos, London
  • K'akumu, O. A. and Olima, W. H. A. (2007): ‘The dynamics and implications of residential segregation in Nairobi’, Habitat International 31 (1): 87–99.
  • Karsten, L. (1998): ‘Growing up in Amsterdam: differentiation and segregation in children's daily lives’, Urban Studies 35 (3): 565–581.
  • Kazepov, Y. (ed.) (2005): Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements, and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion. Blackwell, Oxford
  • Kearns, A. and Forrest, R. (2000): ‘Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance’, Urban Studies 37 (5–6): 995–1017.
  • Keller, S. (1968): The Urban Neighborhood: A Sociological Perspective. Random House, New York
  • Kennedy, R. (2004): Subwayland: Adventures in the World Beneath New York. St Martin's Griffin, New York
  • Kleinhans, R., Priemus, H. and Engbersen, G. (2007): ‘Understanding social capital in recently restructured urban neighbourhoods: two case studies in Rotterdam’, Urban Studies 44 (5–6): 1069–1091.
  • Kovács, Z. (2009): ‘Social and economic transformation of historical neighbourhoods in Budapest’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 100 (4): 399–416.
  • Lelévrier, C. (2013): ‘Social mix neighbourhood policies and social interaction: the experience of newcomers in three new renewal developments in France’, Cities 35: 409–416.
  • Leventhal, T. and Brooks-gunn, J. (2000): ‘The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes’, Psychological Bulletin 126 (2): 309–337.
  • Li, Z. and Wu, F. (2008): ‘Tenure-based residential segregation in post-reform Chinese cities: a case study of Shanghai’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 33 (3): 404–419.
  • Liu, Y., Li, Z. and Breitung, W. (2012): ‘The social networks of new-generation migrants in China's urbanized villages: a case study of Guangzhou’, Habitat International 36 (1): 192–200.
  • Logan, J. R., Stults, B. J. and Farley, R. (2004): ‘Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: two decades of change’, Demography 41 (1): 1–22.
  • Madrazo, B. and Van kempen, R. (2012): ‘Explaining divided cities in China’, Geoforum 43 (2): 158–168.
  • Manley, D., Van ham, M., Bailey, N., Simpson, L. and Maclennan, D. (eds) (2013): Neighbourhood Effects or Neighbourhood Based Problems? A Policy Context. Springer, Dordrecht
  • Massey, D. S., Rothwell, J. and Domina, T. (2009): ‘The changing bases of segregation in the United States’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 626: 74–90.
  • Matthews, H. and Limb, M. (1999): ‘Defining an agenda for the geography of children: review and prospect’, Progress in Human Geography 23 (1): 61–90.
  • Matthews, S. A. (2008): ‘The salience of neighborhood: some lessons from sociology’, American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34 (3): 257–259.
  • Merton, R. K. (1957): Social Theory and Social Structure. 2nd edn. Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
  • Mollenhorst, G. W. (2009): Networks in Contexts: How Meeting Opportunities Affect Personal Relationships. Utrecht University, Utrecht
  • Mumford, L. (1954): ‘The neighborhood and the neighborhood unit’, Town Planning Review 24 (4): 256–270.
  • Musterd, S. (2012): ‘Ethnic residential segregation – reflections on concepts, levels and effects’, in Clapham, D. F., Clark, W. A. V. and Gibb, K. (eds): The SAGE Handbook of Housing Studies. Sage, London, pp. 419–438.
  • Musterd, S., Andersson, R., Galster, G. and Kauppinen, T. M. (2008): ‘Are immigrants' earnings influenced by the characteristics of their neighbours?’, Environment and Planning A 40 (4): 785–805.
  • Narayan, D. (1999): Bonds and bridges: social capital and poverty. Policy Research Working Paper 2167, World Bank, Washington, DC, July.
  • Oberwittler, D. (2007): ‘The effects of neighbourhood poverty on adolescent problem behaviours: a multi-level analysis differentiated by gender and ethnicity’, Housing Studies 22 (5): 781–803.
  • Pérez prieto, H., Sahlström, F., Calander, F., Karlsson, M. and Heikkila, M. (2003): ‘Together? On childcare as a meeting place in a Swedish city’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 47 (1): 43–62.
  • Perry, C. ([1929] 2011): ‘The neighbourhood unit’, in Legates, R. T. and Stout, F. (eds): The City Reader. 5th edn. Routledge, London, pp. 486–498.
  • Phillips, D. (2007): ‘Ethnic and racial segregation: a critical perspective’, Geography Compass 1 (5): 1138–1159.
  • Phillipson, C., Bernard, M., Phillips, J. and Ogg, J. (2001): The Family and Community Life of Older People: Social Networks and Social Support in Three Urban Areas. Routledge, London
  • Pinder, D. (2011): ‘Cities: moving, plugging in, floating, dissolving’, in Cresswell, T. and Merriman, P. (eds): Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects. Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 167–186.
  • Popkin, S. J., Harris, L. E. and Cunningham, M. K. (2002): Families in transition: a qualitative analysis of the MTO experience. Final report. US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, May
  • Putnam, R. D. (1998): ‘Foreword’, Housing Policy Debate 9 (1): v–viii.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000): Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York
  • Roberts, B. R. and Wilson, R. H. (eds) (2009): Urban Segregation and Governance in the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
  • Rofe, M. W. (2003): ‘“I want to be global”: theorising the gentrifying class as an emergent élite global community’, Urban Studies 40 (12): 2511–2526.
  • Rogers, A. (2005): ‘Observations on transnational urbanism: broadening and narrowing the field’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (2): 403–407.
  • Rose, D., Germain, A., Bacqué, M.-H., Bridge, G., Fijalkow, Y. and Slater, T. (2013): ‘“Social mix” and neighbourhood revitalization in a transatlantic perspective: comparing local policy discourses and expectations in Paris (France), Bristol (UK) and Montréal (Canada)’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (2): 430–450.
  • Rosenbaum, J. E., Stroh, L. K. and Flynn, C. A. (1998): ‘Lake Parc Place: a study of mixed-income housing’, Housing Policy Debate 9 (4): 703–740.
  • Ruoppila, S. (2005): ‘Housing policy and residential differentiation in post-socialist Tallinn’, European Journal of Housing Policy 5 (3): 279–300.
  • Sager, L. (2012): ‘Residential segregation and socioeconomic neighbourhood sorting: evidence at the micro-neighbourhood level for migrant groups in Germany’, Urban Studies 49 (12): 2617–2632.
  • Sampson, R. J. (2012): Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  • Sampson, R. J. and Raudenbusch, S. W. (2004): ‘Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows”’, Social Psychology Quarterly 67 (4): 319–342.
  • Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D. and Gannon-rowley, T. (2002): ‘Assessing “neighborhood effects”: social processes and new directions in research’, Annual Review of Sociology 28: 443–478.
  • Scholte, J. A. (1996): ‘Beyond the buzzword: towards a critical theory of globalization’, in Kofman, E. and Youngs, G. (eds): Globalization: Theory, Method and Practice. Pinter, New York, pp. 43–57.
  • Schwanen, T., Dijst, M. and Kwan, M.-P. (2006): ‘Introduction – the Internet, changing mobilities, and urban dynamics’, Urban Geography 27 (7): 585–589.
  • Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006): ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, Environment and Planning A 38 (2): 207–226.
  • South, S. J., Crowder, K. and Chavez, E. (2005): ‘Migration and spatial assimilation among U.S. Latinos: classical versus segmented trajectories’, Demography 42 (3): 497–521.
  • Stein, M. R. (1972): The Eclipse of Community: An Interpretation of American Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
  • Stillwell, J. and Phillips, D. (2006): ‘Diversity and change: understanding the ethnic geographies of Leeds’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32 (7): 1131–1152.
  • Strömgren, M., Tammaru, T., Danzer, A. M., Van ham, M., Marcińczak, S., Stjernström, O. and Lindgren, U. (2014): ‘Factors shaping workplace segregation between natives and immigrants’, Demography 51 (2): 645–671.
  • Suttles, G. D. (1968): The Social Order of the Slum: Ethnicity and Territory in the Inner City. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  • Sykes, B. and Musterd, S. (2011): ‘Examining neighbourhood and school effects simultaneously: what does the Dutch evidence show?’, Urban Studies 48 (7): 1307–1331.
  • Sýkora, L. (2009): ‘New socio-spatial formations: places of residential segregation and separation in Czechia’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 100 (4): 417–435.
  • Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. (1928): The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Knopf, New York
  • Ünlü yücesoy, E. (2006): Everyday Urban Public Space: Turkish Immigrant Women's Perspective. Het Spinhuis, Apeldoorn
  • Urban, S. (2009): ‘Is the neighbourhood effect an economic or an immigrant issue? A study of the importance of the childhood neighbourhood for future integration into the labour market’, Urban Studies 46 (3): 583–603.
  • Urry, J. (2000): Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. Routledge, London
  • Urry, J. (2007): Mobilities. Polity, Cambridge
  • Valentine, G. (1997): ‘“Oh yes I can.” “Oh no you can't”: children and parents' understanding of kids' competence to negotiate public space safely’, Antipode 29 (1): 65–89.
  • Van beckhoven, E. and Van kempen, R. (2003): ‘Social effects of urban restructuring: a case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands’, Housing Studies 18 (6): 853–875.
  • Van eijk, G. (2010): Unequal Networks: Spatial Segregation, Relationships and Inequality in the City. IOS Press, Amsterdam
  • Van ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L. and Maclennan, D. (eds) (2012): Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht
  • Van kempen, R. (2005): ‘Segregation and housing conditions of immigrants in Western European cities’, in Kazepov, Y. (ed.): Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements, and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 190–209.
  • Van kempen, R. and Bolt, G. (2012): ‘Social consequences of residential segregation and mixed neighborhoods’, in Clapham, D. F., Clark, W. A. V. and Gibb, K. (eds): The SAGE Handbook of Housing Studies. Sage, London, pp. 439–460.
  • Veldboer, L., Kleinhans, R. and Duyvendak, J. W. (2002): ‘The diversified neighbourhood in Western Europe and the United States’, Journal of International Migration and Integration/Revue de l'intégration et de la migration internationale 3 (1): 41–64.
  • Vertovec, S. (2004): ‘Cheap calls: the social glue of migrant transnationalism’, Global Networks 4 (2): 219–224.
  • Visser, K., Bolt, G. and Van kempen, R. (2013): ‘Spatial practices and friendship networks of youths: how does the neighbourhood matter?’, paper for the Urban Affairs Association 43rd Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, 3–6 April.
  • Visser, K., Bolt, G. and Van kempen, R. (2014): ‘Out of place? The effects of demolition on youths' social contacts and leisure activities – a case study in Utrecht, the Netherlands’, Urban Studies 51 (1): 203–219.
  • Webber, M. M. (1964): ‘The urban place and the nonplace urban realm’, in Webber, M. M., Dijckman, J. W., Foley, D. L., Guttenberg, A. Z., Wheaton, W. L. C. and Bauer wurster, C. (eds): Explorations into Urban Structure. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 79–153.
  • Wellman, B. (1999): Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities. Westview, Boulder, CO
  • Wellman, B. (2001): ‘Physical space and cyberplace: the rise of personalized networking’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25 (2): 227–252.
  • Wilson, K. L. and Portes, A. (1980): ‘Immigrant enclaves: an analysis of the labor market experiences of Cubans in Miami’, American Journal of Sociology 86 (2): 295–319.
  • Wilson, W. J. (1987): The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  • Wilson, W. J. (1996): When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. Knopf, New York
  • Wissink, B. (2013): ‘Enclave urbanism in Mumbai: an actor-network-theory analysis of urban (dis)connection’, Geoforum 47: 1–11.
  • Wissink, B. and Hazelzet, A. (2012): ‘Social networks in “neighbourhood Tokyo”’, Urban Studies 49 (7): 1527–1548.
  • Wissink, B., Hazelzet, A. and Breitung, W. (2014): ‘Migrant integration in China: evidence from Guangzhou’, in Wu, F., Zhang, F. and Webster, C. (eds): Rural Migrants in Urban China: Enclaves and Transient Urbanism. Routledge, London, pp. 99–120.
  • Wong, D. W. S. and Shaw, S.-L. (2011): ‘Measuring segregation: an activity space approach’, Journal of Geographical Systems 13 (2): 127–145.
  • Wood, M. and Vamplew, C. (1999): Neighbourhood Images in Teesside: Regeneration or Decline? Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
  • Zhou, M. and Logan, J. R. (1991): ‘In and out of Chinatown: residential mobility and segregation of New York City's Chinese’, Social Forces 70 (2): 387–407.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.