161
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Residential Satisfaction and Intention to Move: The Case of Prague’s New Suburbanites

, &
Pages 331-348 | Published online: 13 Feb 2017

References

  • Amerigo, M. and Aragonés, J. I. (1997): ‘A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction’, Journal of Environmental Psychology 17 (1): 47–57.
  • Brown, L. A. and Moore, E. G. (1970): ‘The intra-urban migration process: a perspective’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 52 (1): 1–13.
  • Clark, W., Deurloo, M. and Dielman, F. (2006): ‘Residential mobility and neighbourhood outcomes’, Housing Studies 21 (3): 323–342.
  • Clark, W. and Huang, Y. (2004): ‘Linking migration and mobility: individual and contextual effects in housing markets in the UK’, Regional Studies 38 (6): 617–628.
  • Clark, W. and Weathers, S. (2007): ‘Family migration and mobility sequences in the United States: spatial mobility in the context of the life course’, Demographic Research 17 (20): 591–622.
  • Coulter, R., Van ham, M. and Feijten, P. (2011): ‘A longitudinal analysis of moving desires, expectations and actual moving behaviour’, Environment and Planning A 43 (11): 2742–2760.
  • Coulter, R., Van ham, M. and Findlay, A. M. (2015): ‘Rethinking residential mobility: linking lives through time and space’, Progress in Human Geography 40 (3): 352–374.
  • CVVM (2014): Základní databáze sociálněgeografických a demografických ukazatelů reflektujících postoje obyvatelstva Česka [The Database of Socio-geographic and Demographic Indicators Reflecting the Attitudes of Czech Population]. Centrum pro výzkum veřejného mínění, Sociologický ústav AVČR, v.v.i.
  • CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE (2012): Number of completed dwelling units 2000–2011. Internal database. Czech Statistical Office, Prague.
  • Deane, G. D. (1990): ‘Mobility and adjustments: paths to the resolution of residential stress’, Demography 27 (1): 65–79.
  • De groot, C., Mulder, C. H., Das, M. and Manting, D. (2011): ‘Life events and the gap between intention to move and actual mobility’, Environment and Planning A 43 (1): 48–66.
  • Dekker, K., De vos, S., Musterd, S. and Van kempen, R. (2011): ‘Residential satisfaction in housing estates in European cities: a multi-level research approach’, Housing Studies 26 (4): 479–499.
  • Diaz-serrano, L. (2006): ‘Housing satisfaction, homeowner-ship and housing mobility: a panel data analysis for twelve EU countries’, IZA Discussion Papers (2318): 45 pp.
  • Fang, Y. (2006): ‘Residential satisfaction, moving intention and moving behaviours: a study of redeveloped neighbourhoods in inner-city Beijing’, Housing Studies 21 (5): 671–694.
  • Finnie, R. (1999): ‘Inter-provincial migration in Canada: a longitudinal analysis of movers and stayers and the associated income dynamics’, Canadian Journal of Regional Science 22 (3): 227–262.
  • Gentile, M. (2005): ‘Urban residential preferences and satisfaction in the former Soviet Union: results from a survey in Ust’-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan’, Urban Geography 26 (4): 296–327.
  • Golledge, R. G. and Stimson R.J. (1997): Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective. Guillford Press, New York.
  • Grinstein-weiss, M., Yeo, Y., Anacker, K., Van zandt, S., Freeze, E. B. and Quercia, R. G. (2011): ‘Homeownership and neighbourhood satisfaction among low-and moderate-income household’, Journal of Urban Affairs 33 (3): 247–265.
  • Haase, A., Kabisch, S., Steinführer, A., Bouzarovski, S., Hall, R. and Ogden, P. (2010): ‘Emergent spaces of reurbanisation: exploring the demographic dimension of inner-city residential change in a European setting’, Population, Space and Place 16(5): 443–463.
  • Herfert, G., Neugebauer, C. S. and Smigiel, C. (2013): ‘Living in residential satisfaction? Insights from large-scale housing estates in Central and Eastern Europe’, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 104 (1): 57–74.
  • Hipp, J. (2010): ‘What is the “neighbourhood” in neighbourhood satisfaction? Comparing the effects of structural characteristics measured at the micro-neighbourhood and tract levels’, Urban Studies 47 (12): 2517–2536.
  • Hnilička, P. (2005): Sídelní kaše: Otázky k suburbánní výstavbě kolonií rodinných domů [Urban sprawl: Questions for the Construction of Colonies of Suburban Houses]. Era 21, Brno.
  • Kabisch, N. and Haase, D. (2011). ‘Diversifying European agglomerations: evidence of urban population trends for the 21st century’, Population, Space and Place 17 (3): 236–253.
  • Kabisch, N., Haase, D. and Haase, A. (2010): ‘Evolving reurbanisation? Spatio-temporal dynamics as exemplified by the East German city of Leipzig’, Urban Studies 47 (5): 967–990.
  • Kährik, A., Leetmaa, K. and Tammaru, T. (2012): ‘Residential decision-making and satisfaction among new suburbanites in the Tallinn urban region, Estonia’, Cities 29 (1): 49–58.
  • Kemper, F. J. (2008): ‘Residential mobility in East and West Germany: mobility rates, mobility reasons, reurbanization’, Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 33 (3–4): 293–314.
  • Klápště, P., Bečka, M. and Klášťová, E. (2012): ‘Jak uvažovat o budoucnosti suburbií?’ [‘How to think about the future of suburbia?’], Urbanismus a územní rozvoj 15 (5): 49–54.
  • Kley, S. (2011): ‘Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework’, European Sociological Review 27 (4): 469–486.
  • Kley, S. A. and Mulder, C. H. (2010): ‘Considering, planning, and realizing migration in early adulthood. The influence of life-course events and perceived opportunities on leaving the city in Germany’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 25 (1): 73–94.
  • Kopečná, M. and Špačková, P. (2012): ‘Rezidenční stabilita obyvatel pražského zázemí: příadová studie obce Říčany u Prahy’ [‘Residential stability Inhabitants of Prague’s hinterland: A Case Study of Říčany near Prague’], in Ouředníček, M. and Temelová, J.(eds): Sociální proměny pražských čtvrtí [Social Changes Prague Districts]. Academia, Prague, pp. 206–229.
  • Kostelecký, T. and Čermák, D. (2004): ‘Metropolitan areas in the Czech Republic: definitions, basic characteristics, patterns of suburbanisation and their impact on political behaviour’, Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 4(3): 104.
  • Lee, B. A., Oropesa, R. S. and Kanan, J.W. (1994): ‘Neighborhood context and residential mobility’, Demography 31 (2): 249–270.
  • Ley, D. (1983): A Social Geography of the City. Harper & Row, New York.
  • Long, L. (1972): ‘The influence of number and ages of children on residential mobility’, Demography 9 (3): 371–382.
  • Lovejoy, K., Handy, S. and Mokhtarian, P. (2010): ‘Neighborhood satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments: an evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods’, Landscape and Urban Planning 97 (1): 37–48.
  • Lu, M. (1998): ‘Analyzing migration decision-making: relationships between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions, and moving behavior’, Environment and Planning A 30 (8): 1473–1494.
  • Lu, M. (1999a): ‘Determinants of residential satisfaction: ordered logit vs. regression models’, Growth and Change 30 (2): 264–287.
  • Lu, M. (1999b): ‘Do people move when they say they will? Inconsistencies in individual migration behavior’, Population and Environment 20 (5): 467–488.
  • Lux, M. and Sunega, P. (2007): ‘Vliv podmínek bydlení na zamýšlenou migraci české populace za prací’ [‘The effect of housing conditions on the intended labour migration of the Czech population’]. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 43 (2): 305–332.
  • Lux, M. and Sunega, P. (2010): ‘The future of housing systems after the transition – the case of the Czech Republic’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43 (2): 221–231.
  • Lux, M., Sunega, P., Mikeszová, M. and Kostelecký, T. (2009): ‘Vybrané faktory stojící za vysokými cenami bytů v Praze’ [‘Factors behind high house prices in Prague’], Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 45 (5): 967–991.
  • Mandić, S. (2001): ‘Residential mobility versus “in-place” adjustments in Slovenia: viewpoint from a society “in transition”’, Housing Studies 16 (1): 53–73.
  • Musil, J. (1971): Sociologie bydlení [Sociology of Housing]. Svoboda, Praha.
  • Novák, J. and Sýkora, L. (2007): ‘A city motion: time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and structuration of spatial organization in Prague Metropolitan area’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 89 (2): 147–168.
  • Ouředníček, M. (2003): ‘Suburbanizace Prahy’ [‘Suburbanization of Prague’], Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 39 (2): 235–253.
  • Ouředníček, M. (2007): ‘Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 89 (2): 111–125.
  • Ouředníček, M., Šimon, M. and Kopečná, M. (2015): ‘The reurbanisation concept and its utility for contemporary research on post-socialist cities: the case of the Czech Republic’, Moravian Geographical Reports 23 (4): 25–35.
  • Ouředníček, M., Špačková, P. and Novak, J. (2013): ‘Metodické problémy výzkumu a vymezení zón rezidenční suburbanizace v České republice’ [‘Methodological problems of research and zoning residential suburbanization in Czech Republic’], in Ouředníček, M., Špačková, P. and Novak, J. (eds): Sub Urbs: krajina, sídla a lidé [Sub Urbs: Landscape, Settlements and People]. Academia, Praha, pp. 309–332.
  • Potter, J. and Cantarero, R. (2006): ‘How does increasing population and diversity affect resident satisfaction? A small community case study’, Environment and Behavior 38 (5): 605–625.
  • Rohe, W. M. and Stewart, L. S. (1996): ‘Homeownership and neighborhood stability’, Housing Policy Debate 7 (1): 37–81.
  • Rossi, P. H. (1980): Why Families Move. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
  • Sabagh, G., Van arsdol, M. D. and Butler, E. W. (1969): ‘Some determinants of intrametropolitan residential mobility: conceptual considerations’, Social Forces 48 (1): 88–98.
  • Špaček, O. (2012): ‘Česká panelová sídliště: faktory stability a budoucího vývoje’ [‘Czech housing estates: factors of stability and future development’], Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 48 (5): 965–988.
  • Špačková, P. and Ouředníček, M. (2012): ‘Spinning the web: new social contacts of Prague’s suburbanites’, Cities 29 (5): 341–349.
  • Špačková, P., Pospíšilová, L. and Ouředníček, M. (2016): ‘The long-term development of socio-spatial differentiation in socialist and post-socialist Prague’, Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 52(6): forthcoming.
  • Speare, A. (1974): ‘Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility’, Demography 11 (2): 173–188.
  • Sýkora, L. (2003): ‘Suburbanizace a její společenské důsledky’ [‘Suburbanization and its social consequences’], Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 39 (2): 217–234.
  • Sýkora, L. and Mulíček, O. (2014): ‘Urban growth and regional sprawl’, in Stanilov, K. and Sýkora, L.(eds): Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. Wiley-Blackwell, Maiden, MA, pp. 133–162.
  • Sýkora, L. and Ouředníček, M. (2007): ‘Sprawling post-communist metropolis: commercial and residential suburbanisation in Prague and Brno, the Czech Republic’, in Razin, E., Dijst, M. and Vázquez, C.(eds): Employment Deconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas: Market Forces versus Planning Regulations. Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 209–233.
  • Temelová, J., Novák, J. and Jíchová, J. (2016): ‘Safe life in the suburbs? Crime and perceptions of safety in new residential developments in Prague’s hinterland, Czech Republic’, European Urban and Regional Studies 22 (4): 677–696.
  • Temelová, J. and Špačková, P. (2013): ‘Rezidenční stabilita obyvatel pražských suburbií: případová studie mikroregionu Dolnobřežansko’ [‘esidential stability of Prague’s suburb: case study of Microregion Dolnobřežansko’], Urbanismus a územní rozvoj 16 (6): 9–14.
  • Vobecká, J. and Kostelecký, T. (2007): Politické důsledky suburbanizace: analýza případových studií proměn politického chování a občanské participace ve vybraných suburbánních lokalitách Prahy a Brna [Political Consequences of Suburbanization. Analysis of Case Studies of Changes in Political Behavior and Civic Participation in Selected Suburban Locations in Prague and Brno]. Institute of Sociology, Prague.
  • Wattel, H. (1958): ‘Levittown: a suburban community’, in Dobriner, W. M. (ed.): The Suburban Community. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, pp. 287–313.
  • Weidemann, S. and Anderson, J. R. (1985): ‘A conceptual framework for residential satisfaction’, in Altman, I. and Werner, C. H. (eds): Home Environments, vol. 8. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 153–182.
  • Winstanley, A., Thorns, D. C. and Perkins, H. C. (2002): ‘Moving house, creating home: exploring residential mobility’, Housing Studies 17 (6): 813–832.
  • Wolpert, J. (1965): ‘Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate’, Papers in Regional Science 15(1): 159–169.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.