INFLUENCES ON COUNTY FARMLAND PROTECTION EFFORTS IN CALIFORNIA: A DISCRIMINANT ANALYSISFootnote∗

∗I wish to acknowledge the valuable counsel provided by J. Dennis Lord and Walter Martin and the reviewer, Rodney Steiner, during the preparation of this paper. This research was supported in part by funds from the UNCC Foundation and the State of North Carolina.

Literature Cited

• California Department of Finance. California Statistical Abstract Sacramento: Financial Research Section 1981
   Google Scholar
• California Office of Planning and Research. Saving the Good Earth, What California Counties Are Doing to Conserve Agricultural Land Sacramento: State of California 1981
   Google Scholar
• Chicoine , D. L and Quinn , J. A . 1981 . “ Coal versus Corn: Competition for Agricultural Land of Knox County, Illinois ” . In Local Agricultural Land Policies: Cases from the Midwest , Edited by: Barrows , R and Libby , L . 121 – 156 . Ames, IA : The North Central Regional Center for Rural Development, Iowa State University .
   Google Scholar
• County Supervisors Association of California . 1980 . California County Fact Book , Sacramento : County Supervisors Association of California . circa
   Google Scholar
• Esseks , J. D . 1978 . “ The Politics of Farmland Preservation ” . In The New Politics of Food , Edited by: Hadwinger , D. F and Browne , W. P . 196 – 216 . Lexington, MA : D. C. Heath .
   Google Scholar
• Fischel , W. A . 1982 . The Urbanization of Agricultural Land: A Review of the National Agricultural Lands Study . Land Economics , 98 : 236 – 259 .
   Google Scholar
• Frieden , B. J . 1979 . The New Regulation Comes to Suburbia . The Public Interest , 55 : 15 – 27 .
   Google Scholar
• Klecka , W. R . 1975 . “ Discriminant Analysis ” . In SPSS, Statistical Package For the Social Sciences , Edited by: Nie , N. H . 434 – 467 . New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Klecka , W. R . 1980 . “ Series: Quantitative Application in the Social Sciences No. 19 ” . In Discriminant Analysis , Beverly Hills, CA : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• La Macchia , E . 1977 . Where Liberal Doesn't Mean Democrat, The Deceptive Contradictions of County Voting Patterns . The California Journal ,
   Google Scholar
• Lee , E. C and Keith , B. E . 1974 . California Votes 1960–1972 , Berkeley CA : Institute of Government Studies, University of California, Berkeley .
   Google Scholar
• Livingston , L . 1983 . Of Grapes and Greed and Golden Eggs . Landscape Architecture , 73 : 60 – 61 .
   Google Scholar
• Morrison , D. G . 1971 . “ On the Interpretation of Discriminant Analysis ” . In Multivariate Analysis in Marketing: Theory & Applications , Edited by: Aaker , D. A . 127 – 142 . Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Pierce , J. T and Furuseth , O. J . 1983 . Assessing the Adequacy of North American Agricultural Land Resources . Geoforum , 14 : 413 – 425 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogin , M. P and Shover , J. L . 1970 . Political Change in California, Critical Elections and Social Movements, 1890–1966 , Westport, CT : Greenwood Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Sampson , R. N . 1982 . Saving Agricultural Land: Environmental Issue of the 1980s . The Environmentalist , 2 : 321 – 332 .
   Google Scholar
• Urban Land Institute. 1982 . The Agricultural Land Preservation Issue: Recommendations for Balancing Urban and Agricultural Land Needs . Urban Land , 41 : 18 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. 1980 . 1978 Census of Agriculture , Washington : U.S. Government Printing Office .
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. 1982 . General Population Characteristics, California , Washington : U.S. Government Printing Office .
   Google Scholar
• Yapa , L. S and Mayfield , R. C . 1978 . Non-Adoption of Innovations: Evidence From Discriminant Analysis . Economic Geography , 54 : 145 – 156 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• His main research interests are in land use planning and policy development.
   Google Scholar
• ∗I wish to acknowledge the valuable counsel provided by J. Dennis Lord and Walter Martin and the reviewer, Rodney Steiner, during the preparation of this paper. This research was supported in part by funds from the UNCC Foundation and the State of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar