On the nature of the beast: re‐charting political geographies of the european union

References

• Adshead, M. (2002): Developing European Regions? ComparativeGovernance, Policy Networks and European Integration. Ashgate, Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. (2001): ‘How many Europes? The European Union, eastward enlargement and uneven development’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 8: 29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (1997): ‘Genesis of a Western European spatial policy’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17: 158–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J.,Massey, D.,Cochrane, A. et al. (1998): Rethinking the Region. Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A.,Charles, D.R. and Howells, J. (1992): ‘Corporate restructuring and cohesion in the new Europe’, Regional Studies, 26: 319–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (1996): ‘The shifting stage of politics: new medieval and postmodern territorialities’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14: 133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate, C. (1999): ‘A Europe of the regions: reflections on the historiography of sub‐national places in modern times’, American Historical Review, 104: 1157–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I. (1998): The Politics of European Union Regional Policy: Multi‐level Governance or Flexible Gatekeeping?Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, G. (2001): ‘The Europeanisation of Brussels and the urbanization of Europe: hybridizing the city, empowerment and disempowerment in the EU district’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 8: 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. (2001): ‘Culture, policy and subsidiarity in the European Union: from symbolic identity to the governmentalisation of culture’, Political Geography, 20: 405–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (1993): ‘The European network’, New Formations, 29: 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (1996): ‘The European Community and European government: harmonization, mobility and space’, Economy and Society, 22: 314–326.
   Google Scholar
• Blacksell, M. (1977): Post‐war Europe: A Political Geography. Dawson, Folkstone.
   Google Scholar
• Boeri, S. (2001): ‘Notes for a research program’, in Koolhaas, R.,Boeri, S.,Kwinter, S.,Tazi, N. and Obrist, H.U. (eds): Mutations, ACTAR and arc en rêve centre d'architecture, Barcelona and Bordeaux.
   Google Scholar
• Böröcz, J. (2001): ‘Empire and coloniality in the ‘Eastern Enlargement’ of the European Union’, in Böröcz, J. and Ková s, M. (eds): Empires' New Clothes: Unveiling EU Enlargement. Central European Review, Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Bornschier V. (2001): ‘European processes and the state of the European Union’, in Woodward. A. and Kohli, M. (eds): Inclusions and Exclusions in European Societies. Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, P. (1992): When Time Shall Be No More: Prophecy Belief in Modern American Culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (1998): ‘Global cities, glocal states: global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe’, Review of International Political Economy, 5: 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004): ‘Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960–2000’, Review of International Political Economy, 11: 447–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullmann, U. (1997): ‘The politics of the Third Level’, Regional and Federal Studies, 6: 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J.A. (1996): ‘The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post‐modern?’Journal of Common Market Studies, 34: 29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T.,Jørgensen, K.E. and Wiener, A. (eds) (2001): The Social Construction of Europe. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Chryssochoou, D.N. (2001): Theorizing European Integration. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Church, C.H. and Phinnemore, D. (2002): The Penguin Guide to the European Treaties. Penguin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (2001): ‘Vocabulary of the new Europe: code words for the millennium’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19: 697–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez, T. (2001): ‘Speaking “Europe”: the politics of integration discourses’, in Christiansen, T.,Jørgensen K.E. and Wiener, A. (eds): The Social Construction of Europe. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan S. and Goodwin, M. (1988): The Local State and Uneven Development: Behind the Local Government Crisis. Cambridge, Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunford, M. and Smith, A. (2000): ‘Catching up or falling behind? Economic performance and regional trajectories in the “New Europe”, Economic Geography, 76: 169–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist, THE (2005): ‘Charlemagne: taking on the bear, The Economist, 713 May: 48.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B.,Goodwin, M.,Pemberton, S. and Woods M. (2001): ‘Partnerships, power, and scale in rural governance’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19: 289–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, S. and Ter haar, G. (1998): ‘Religion and politics in Sub‐Saharan Africa’, The Journal of Modern African Studies, 36: 175–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eser, T.W. and Konstadakopulos, D. (2000): ‘Power shifts in the European Union? The case of spatial planning’, European Planning Studies, 8: 783–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESPON (2004): ESPON in Progress: Preliminary Results by Autumn 2003. The ESPON Programme, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D. and Jonas, A.E.G. (2001): ‘Rescaling and regional governance: the English Regional Development Agencies and the environment’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19: 269–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D.,Jonas, A.E.G.,Reimer, S. and Spooner, D.J. (2001): ‘Governance, institutional capacity and partnerships in local economic development: theoretical issues and empirical evidence from the Humber sub‐region’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 26: 103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, B. (2001): “Institutional thickness”, political subculture‘nd the resurgence of (the “new”) regionalism in Italy — a case study of the Northern League in the province of Varese’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 26: 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldmann, K. (2001): Transforming the European Nationstate. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. and Painter, J. (1996): ‘Local governance, the crises of fordism and the changing geographies of regulation’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21: 635–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, B. (1998): Modern Europe: Place, Culture. Identity. Arnold, London.
   Google Scholar
• Grasse, A. (2001): ‘The myth of regionalisation in Europe — rhetoric and reality of an ambivalent concept’, Journal of European Area Studies, 9: 79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gripaios, P. and Mangles, T. (1993): ‘An analysis of European super regions’, Regional Studies27: 745–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. (2000): ‘Gendered communities: the ambiguous attraction of Europe’, in Kelstrup, M. and Williams, M.C. (eds): International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community. Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, M. (1998): ‘Fin de siècle, fin du monde? On the origins of European geopolitics, 1890–1920’, in Dodds, K. and Atkinson, D. (eds): Geopolitical Traditions: A Century of Geopolitical Thought, Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström, A. (2003): ‘Beyond space: border making in European integration, the case of Ireland’, Geografiska Annaler Series B, 85: 123–135.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, D. (2000): ‘The New Roman Empire: European envisionings and American premillennialists’, Journal of American Studies, 34: 23–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. (1966): ‘Obstinate and obsolete? The fate of the nation state in the case of Western Europe’, Daedalus, 95: 862–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. and Williams, A.M. (eds) (1999): Divided Europe: Society and Territory. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. and Raco, M. (1999): ‘How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 24: 45–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jachtenfuchs, M. (2001): ‘The governance approach to European integration’, The Journal of Common Market Studies, 39: 245–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O.B. and Richardson, T. (2001): ‘Nested visions: new rationalities of space in European Spatial Planning’, Regional Studies, 35: 703–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O.B. and Richardson, T. (2004): Making European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity. Routledge: London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• John, P.,Musson, S. and Tickell, A. (2002) ‘England's problem region: regionalism in the South‐East’, Regional Studies, 36: 733–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. and Macleod, G. (1999): ‘Towards a regional renaissance? Reconfiguring and rescaling England's economic governance’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 24: 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. and Macleod, G. (2004) ‘Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: territory, insurgent politics and the English question’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 29: 433–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, C.,Tägil, S. and Törnqvist, G. (2000): Organizing European Space. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. (2001): ‘The European Union: an evolving system of multi‐level governance…or government?’, Policy and Politics, 29: 193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (1998): ‘A regional level of government in Europe?’, in Le galès, P. and Lequesne, C. (eds): Regions in Europe. Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. (2002): ‘Re‐imagining the scalar topologies of cross‐border governance: Eu(ro)regions in the postcolonial present’, Space and Polity, 6: 169–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. and Hooper, B. (eds) (2004): Cross‐border Governance in the European Union. Routledge, Abingdon and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. (2004): ‘Europe's eastern expansion and the reinscription of otherness in East‐Central Europe’, Progress in Human Geography, 28: 472–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. and Ogden, P. (1976): Economy and Society in the EEC: Spatial Perspectives. Saxon House, Farnborough.
   Google Scholar
• Le galès, P. (2002): European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P. and Meegan, R. (1996): ‘Contested governance: European experience in the English regions’, European Planning Studies, 4: 75–97.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, D. (2000): ‘Regulating regional spaces: state agencies and the production of governance in the Scottish Highlands’, Environment and Planning A, 33: 823–844.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, G. (1998): ‘In what sense a region? Place, hybridity, symbolic shape and institutional formation in (post) modern Scotland’, Political Geography, 17: 833–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, G. (1999): ‘Place, politics and ‘scale dependence”’: exploring the strucuration of Euro‐regionalism’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 6: 231–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, G. and Goodwin, M. (1999): ‘Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance’, Progress in Human Geography, 23: 503–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V. (2001): ‘The territoriality of European integration and the territorial features of the European Union: the first 50 years’, Tijdschrift voor Economimische en Sociale Geografie, 92: 420–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (1998): ‘EU programmes and the evolution of local economic governance in the UK’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 5: 237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcneill, D. (2001): ‘Embodying Europe of the cities: geographies of mayoral leadership’, Area, 35: 353–359.
   Google Scholar
• Mcneill, D. (2004): New Europe: Imagined Spaces. Arnold, London.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, A.S. (1992): The European Rescue of the Nation State. Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, A.S. (1993): ‘Conclusions: the value of history’, in Milward, A.S.,Lynch, F.M.B.,Romero, F.,Ranieri, R. and Sørensen, V. (eds): The Frontier of National Sovereignty: History and Theory 1945–1992. Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, A.S. and Sørensen, V. (1993): ‘Independence or integration? A rational choice’, in Milward, A.S.,Lynch, F.M.B.,Romero, F.,Ranieri, R. and Sørensen, V. (eds): The Frontier of National Sovereignty: History and Theory 1945‐1992. Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, A.S.,Lynch, F.M.B.,Romero, F.,Ranieri, R. and Sørensen, V. (eds) (1993): The Frontier of National Sovereignty: History and Theory 1945–1992, Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (1998): Betrayal of the Innocents: Desire, Power and the Catholic Church in Spain. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. (2002): ‘EU eligibility, Central Europe, and the invention of applicant state narrative’, Geopolitics, 7: 89–116.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1991): ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: national interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community’, International Organisation, 45: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1993): ‘Preferences and power in the European Community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31: 473–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1998): The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn, T. (1977): The Break‐up of Britain: Crises and Neonationalism. New Left Books, London.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I.B. (1999) Uses of the Other: ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaïdis, K. and Howse, R. (2002): ‘“This is my EUtopia…”: narrative as power’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40: 767–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, A. (1998): ‘The conspiracy behind the European Union: what every Christian should know’. Lecture delivered at the Annual Autumn Conference of the United Protestant Council in London on 7 November (http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=conspiracy, accessed 4 August 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, N. and Paterson, W. (2003): ‘The political system of the European Union’, in Hayward, J. and Menon, A. (eds): Governing Europe. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J.P. (2002): ‘The many faces of Europeanization’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40: 921–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2001): ‘Europe as a social process and discourse: considerations of place, boundaries and identity’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 8: 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G (1983): A Political Geography of Community Europe. Butterworths, London.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (1995): ‘The social regulation of uneven development: ‘regulatory deficit’, England's South East and the collapse of Thatcherism’, Environment and Planning A, 27: 15–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puchala, D.J. (1972): ‘Of blind men, elephants and European Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 10: 267–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, T. (2000): ‘Discourses of rurality in EU spatial policy: the European Spatial Development Perspective’, Sociologia Ruralis, 40: 53–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosamond, B. (2000): Theories of European Integration. Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Rossler, M. (1989): ‘Applied geography and area research in Nazi society: central place theory and planning’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7: 419–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. (1993): ‘Territoriality and beyond: problematising modernity in international relations’, International Organisation, 47: 139–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassoon, D. (1997): One Hundred Years of Socialism: the West European Left in the Twentieth Century. Fontana Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.W. (2002): ‘A networked space of meaning? Spatial politics as geostrategies of European integration’, Space and Polity, 6: 147–167.
   Google Scholar
• Shirlow, P. (2000): ‘Fundamentalist loyalism: discourse, resistance and identity politics’, in Gold, J. and Revill, G. (eds): Landscapes of Defence. Prentice Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. (1997): ‘Metaphors of Europe: integration and the politics of language’, in Nugent, S. and Shore, C. (eds): Anthropology and Cultural Studies. Pluto, London.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. (2000): Building Europe: the Cultural Politics of European Integration. Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sidaway, J.D. (2001): ‘Rebuilding bridges: a critical geopolitics of Iberian transfrontier cooperation in a European context’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19: 743–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2002): ‘Imagining geographies of the “new Europe”: geo‐economic power and the new European architecture of integration’, Political Geography, 21: 647–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. (2000): ‘“Chunnel Visions”: unpacking the anticipatory geographies of an Anglo‐European borderland’, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 25: 187–219.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw E. (2000): ‘Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18: 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnock, D. (2002): ‘Cross‐border cooperation: a major element in regional policy in East Central Europe’, Scottish Geographical Journal, 118: 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R.B.J. (2000): ‘Europe is not where it is supposed to be’, in Kelstrup, M. and Williams, M.C. (eds): International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community. Routledge, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. (2000): ‘Analysing and explaining policies’, in Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds): Policy‐making in the European Union. (4th edn) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, W. (2000): ‘Collective governance’, in Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds): Policy‐making in the European Union, fourth edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. (2002): ‘Mapping Schengenland: denaturalizing the border’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20: 561–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels, S. (1997): ‘An ever closer fusion? A dynamic macropolitical view on integration processes’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 35: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R.H. (2000): ‘Constructing the European Spatial Development Perspective — for whom?’, European Planning Studies, 8: 357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R.H. (2001): ‘The contribution of spatial planning to social cohesion in the European Union’, in Haller, M. (ed): The Making of the EU. Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, M. (2000): ‘The Atlantic Arc: transnational European reality or regional mirage?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38: 865–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar