The value of training accommodative facility for ball sports

REFERENCES

• Mcleod B. Effects of Eyerobics visual skills training on selected performance measures of female varsity soccer players. Percept Mot Skills 1991; 12:863–866.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn TE, Chaplick DD. Visual training in soccer. Percept Mot Skills 1991; 72: 1238–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper WS, Landers DM. The role of visual training exercises in visual abilities and shooting performance. In: Psychology of Motor Behavior and Sport. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity. Gulf Park , Massachusetts : NASPSPA, 1985: 166.
   Google Scholar
• Reichow AW, Stern NS. Sports vision: a review of the literature. Curriculum II (Opto-melric Extension Program Foundation) 1986; 59: 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Abernethy B. Enhancing sports performance through clinical and experimental optometry. Clin Exp Oplom 1986; 69: 189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Hazel CA. The efficacy of sports vision practice and its role in optometry. Clin Exp Optom 1995; 78:98–105.
   Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Abernethy B. An assessment of the efficacy of sports vision training programs. Optom Vision Sci 1997; 74: 646–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey B, Reichow AW. Visual performance enhancement in sports optometry. In: Loran DFC, Macewen CJ eds. Sports Vision. Oxford : Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1995: 158–177.
   Google Scholar
• Applegate RA, Applegate RA. Set shot shooting performance and visual acuity in basketball. Optom Vision Sci 1992; 69: 765–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Optometrical Association Top cricketers could do better. All About Eyes. Optometry's Magazine on Eye Care and Eash-ion. 1996. (No. 3).
   Google Scholar
• Christenson GN, Winkelstein AM. Visual skills of athletes versus nonathletes: development of a sports vision testing battery. J Amer Optom Assoc 1988; 59: 666–675.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stine GD, Arterburn MR, Stern NS. Vision and sports: A review of the literature. J Amer Optom Assoc 1982; 53: 627–633.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West KL, Bressan ES. The effect of a general versus specific visual skills training pro‐grant on accuracy in judging length‐of‐ball in cricket. Int J Sports Vis 1996; 3: 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Holland K. Training the eye on sporting success. Optician 1993; 30 July: 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Tresilian JR. Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1991; 17: 865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ. Accommodation and apparent distance. Perception 1988; 17: 609–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele S, Posner M. Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1968; 7: 1019–1030.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting HTA. Acquiring ball skills: a psychological interpretation. London : Bell & Hyman, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Beggs W, Howarth C. Movement control in a repetitive motor task. Nature 1970; 225: 752–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcleod P. Visual reaction time and highspeed ball games. Perception 1987; 16: 49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahill AT, Karnavas WJ. The perceptual illusion of baseball's rising fastball and breaking curveball. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1993; 19: 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotulak JC, Schor CM. The accommodative response to subthreshold blur and perceptual fading during the Troxler phenomenon. Perception 1986; 15: 7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludlam WM, Wittenberg S, Giglio EJ, Rosenberg R. Accommodative responses to small changes in dioptric stimulus. Amer J Optom Arch Amer Acad Optom 1968; 45: 483–506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mordi J. Accommodation, Ageing and Presbyopia [PhD Thesis]. New York: State College of Optometry, State University of New York, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell FW. The depth of field of the human eye. Opt Acta (Paris) 1957; 4: 157–164.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell FW, Westheimer G. Dynamics of accommodation responses of the human Eye J Physiol 1960; 151: 285–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron G, Winn B. Binocular accommodation reaction and response times for normal observers. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 176–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter JH. A servoanalysis of the human accommodative mechanism. Arch Soc Amer Oflalmol Optom 1962; 4: 137–168.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips S, Shirachi D, Stark LW. Analysis of accommodative response times using histogram information. Amer J Optom Arch Amer Acad Optom 1972; 49: 389–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randle RJ, Murphy MR. The dynamic response of visual accommodation over a seven‐day period. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 1974; 51:530–544.
   Google Scholar
• Burr DC, Ross J, Morrone MC. Seeing objects in motion. Proc R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 1986; 227: 249–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan MJ, Benton S. Motion‐blurring in human vision. Nature 1989; 340: 385–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paakkonen A, Morgan MJ. Effects of motion on blur discrimination. J Opt Soc Amer A Opt Image Sci 1994; 11:992–1002.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenzie KM, Kerr SR, Rouse MW. Study of accommodative facility testing reliability. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 186–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levine S, Ciuffreda KJ, Selenow A, Flax N. Clinical assessment of accommodative facility in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. J Amer Optom Assoc 1985; 56: 286–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abernethy B, Russell DG. Advance cue utilisation by skilled cricket batsmen. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1984; 16:2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan MW. Accommodation and its relationship to convergence. AmerJ Optom Arch Amer Acad Optom 1944; 21: 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Nadell MC, Knoll HA. The effect of luminance, target configuration and lenses upon the refractive state of the eye. Part 1. Amer J Optom Arch Amer Acad Optom 1956; 33: 24–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward PA, Charman WN. Effect of pupil size on steady state accommodation. Vision Res 1985; 25: 1317–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miege C, Denieul P. Mean response and oscillations of accommodation for various stimulus vergences in relation to accommodation feedback control. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randle RJ. Responses of myopes to volitional control training of accommodation. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randle RJ. Volitional control of visual accommodation. In: Conference Proceeding No. 82 on Adaptation and Acclimatization in Aerospace Medicine. AGARD, NATO, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe SN, Couchman DH. Improving visual performance through volitional focus control. Hum Factors 1987; 29: 311–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellers JA, Alpert TL, Rouse MW. A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility. J Amer Optom Assoc 1984; 55: 31–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar