Clinical features of pseudoexfoliation of the lens capsule: suggested management

REFERENCES

• Duke‐elder S. System of Ophthalmology. Vol XI. Diseases of the Lens and Vitreous: Glaucoma and Hypotony. London : Henry Kimpton, 1969: 45.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann GOH, Schlotzer‐schrehardt U, Kiichle M. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome for the comprehensive ophthalmologist. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 951–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baba H. Histochemical and polarization optical investigation for glycoaminoglycans in XF syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1983; 221: 106–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison JC, Green WR. Light microscopy of the exfoliative syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66 (Suppl 184): 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Prince AM, Streeten BW, Ritch R, Dark J, Sperling M. Preclinical diagnosis of pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 1076–1082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dark AJ, Streeton BW. Precapsular film on the ageing human lens: Precursor of pseudoexfoliation. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74: 717–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeton BW, Dark AJ, Wallace RN, Li Z‐Y, Hoepner JA. Pseudoexfliative fibrillopathy in the skin of patients with ocular pseudoexfoliation. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 110: 490–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholtzer‐schrehardt UM, Cooca MR, Naumann GOH, Volkolz H. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: ocular manifestation of a systemic disorder Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 1752–1756.
   Google Scholar
• Eagle RC, Font RL, Fine BS. The basement membrane exfoliation syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 510–515.
   Google Scholar
• Streeton BW, Li Z‐Y, Wallace RN, Eagle RC, Keshgegian AA. Pseudoexfoliative fibrillopathy in visceral organs of a patient with pseudoexfoliative syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 1757–1762.
   Google Scholar
• Konstas AG, Ritch R, Bufidis T, Morales J, Qi Y, Streeton B. Exfoliation syndrome in a 17 year old girl. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115: 1063–1067.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horvan I, Hutchinson BT. Exfoliation syndrome case reports of 31 and 35 year old patients. Acta Ophthalmologica 1967; 45: 294–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsius H. Exfoliation syndrome in various ethnic populations. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66 (Suppl 184): 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Eksöm C. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation in a population of 65–74 years of age. Acta Ophthalmol 1987; 65 (Suppl 182): 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor HR, Hollows FC, Moran D. Pseudoexfoliation of the lens in Australian aborigines. Br J Ophthalmol 1977; 61: 473–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn DM. The prevalence of pseudoexfolation of the lens capsule in an Australian sample and its association with glaucoma. Aust J Optom 1980; 63: 119–122.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner HW. Pseudo‐exfoliation of the lens among the Navajo Indians. Am J Ophthalmol 1971:72:206–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summanen P, Tönjum AM. Exfoliation syndrome among the Saudis. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66 (Suppl 184): 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Aasved H. The geographical distribution of fibrillopathia epitheliocapsularis, so‐called senile exfoliation or pseudoexfoliation of the anterior lens capsule. Acta Ophthalmol 1969; 47: 792–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colin J, Le Gall G, Le Jeune B, Cambrai MD. The prevalence of exfoliation syndrome in different areas of France. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66 (Suppl 184): 86–89.
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Kimura Y, Aoki K. Prevalence of exfoliation syndrome in the Japanese. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66 (Suppl 184): 112–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ball SF. Exfoliation syndrome prevalence in the glaucoma population of South Louisiana. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66 (Suppl 184): 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Kozart DM, Yanoff M. Intraocular pressure status in 100 consecutive patients with exfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology 1982; 89:214–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry CJ, Krupin T, Schmitt M, Lauffer J, Miller E, Ewing MQ, Scheie HG. Long term follow‐up of pseudoexfoliation and the development of elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology 1987; 94: 545–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminlari A. Glaucoma capsulare. Glaucoma 1983; 5: 134–135.
   Google Scholar
• Tarkkanen A. Pseudoexfoliation of the lens capsule. Acta Ophthalmol 1962; (Suppl 71): 98.
   Google Scholar
• Roth M, Epstein DL. Exfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1980, 89; 477–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aasved H. The frequency of fibrillopathia epitheliocapsularis (so‐called senile exfoliation or pseudoexfoliation) in patients with open angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 1971; 49: 194–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashwell LF Jr, Shields MB. Exfoliation syndrome: Prevalence in a southeastern United States population. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 335–336.
   Google Scholar
• Sziklai P, Süveges I. Glaucoma capsulare in patients with open angle glaucoma in Hungary. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66 (Suppl 184): 90–92.
   Google Scholar
• Valle O. Prevalence of simple and capsular glaucoma in the central hospital district of Kotka. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66 (Suppl 184): 116–119.
   Google Scholar
• Cashwell LF Jr, Shields MB. Exfoliation syndrome in southeastern United States: Prevalence in glaucoma and non‐glaucoma populations. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66 (Suppl 184): 99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew RS. Pseudocapsular exfoliation in the Bantu of South Africa. Br J Ophthalmol 1973; 57: 41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Houriham F. The relationship between glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117:1319–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake K, Matsuda M, Inada M. Corneal endothelial changes in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 108; 49–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye DC, Collin HB. Glaucoma in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Clin Exp Optom 1986; 69: 129–130.
   Google Scholar
• Teus MA, Castejon MA, Calvo MA, Perez‐salaices P, Marcos A. Intraocular pressure as a risk factor for visual field loss in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and in primary open‐angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 2229–2230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohjanpelto P. Late results of laser trabeculoplasty for increased intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol 1983; 61: 998–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies W. Corticosteroid induced ocular hypertension in pseudo‐exfoliation of lens capsule. Am J Ophthalmol 1970; 70: 90–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle O, Vannas A. The cyclopentalate provocation test in suspected or untreated open angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 1976; 54: 783–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airaksinen PJ. Long term hypotensive effect of timolol maleate compared with the effect of pilocarpine in simple and capsular glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 1979; 57: 425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucci MG. Italian Latanoprost Study Group. Intraocular pressure‐lowering effects of latanoprost monotherapy versus latanoprost or pilocarpine in combination with timolol: a randomized, observer‐masked multicenter study in patients with open‐angle glaucoma. Glaucoma 1999; 8: 24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman TJ. Editorial. Maximal medical therapy for glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 15: 1579–1580.
   Google Scholar
• Ritch R, Podos SM. Laser trabeculoplasty in exfoliation syndrome. Bull NY Acad Med 1983; 59: 339.
   Google Scholar
• Carpel EF. Pupillary dilatation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105: 692–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno‐montanes J, Duch S, Lajara J. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: Clinical factors related to capsular rupture in cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 1993; 71: 181–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage JA, Tohmas JV, Belcher CD, Simmons RJ. Extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology 1995; 92: 1506–1516.
   Google Scholar
• Wishart PK, Spaeth GL, Poryzees EM. Anterior chamber in the exfoliation syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 1985; 69: 103–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar