Clinical performance and factors affecting the physical fit of a soft toric frequent replacement contact lens

REFERENCES

• Holden BA. The principles and practice of correcting astigmatism with soft contact lenses. Aust J Optom 1975; 58: 279–299.
   Google Scholar
• Dabkowski JA, Roach MP, Begley CG. Soft toric versus spherical lenses in myopes with low astigmatism. ICLC 1992; 19: 252–255.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse A., Lofstrom T. How much visual benefit does an astigmat achieve being corrected with a toric correction ICLC 1996; 23: 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall EC, Begley CG, Nguyen CHD. Frequency of complications among wearers of disposable and conventional soft contact lenses. IClC 1992; 19: 55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Cox IG, Comstock TL, Reindel WT. A clinical comparison of two leading toric soft contact lenses. Spectrum 2000; 15: 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lam CSV, Loran DFC. Designing contact lenses for Oriental eyes. J Brit Cont Lens Assoc 1991; 14: 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung SW, Cho P., Douthwaite W. Corneal shape of Hong Kong‐Chinese. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2000; 20: 119–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda LM, Woldorff CL, Kame RT, Hayashida JK. Clinical comparison of corneal diameter and curvature in Asian eyes with those of Caucasian eyes. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 51–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho P., Brown B. Review of the TBUT technique and a closer look at the TBUT of Hong Kong Chinese. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 30–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho P. Reliability of a portable noninvasive tear break‐up time test on Hong Kong‐Chinese. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 1049–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S., Virhia SK, Farrell P. Stability of the precorneal tear film in Chinese, African, Indian, and Caucasian eyes. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 911–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litde SA, Bruce AS. Repeatability of the phenol‐red thread and tear thinning time tests for tear film function. Clin Exp Optom 1994; 77: 64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Cho P., Kwong YM. A comparative study of two cotton thread tests for tear volume. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1996; 19: 77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Holly FJ. Tear film physiology and contact lens wear. II. Contact lens‐tear film interaction. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981; 58: 331–341.
   Google Scholar
• Guillon J‐P, Guillon M., Malgouyres S. Corneal desiccation staining with hydrogel lenses: tear film and contact lens factors. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1990; 10: 343–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G., Efron N. Characteristics of the pre‐lens tear film during hydrogel contact lens wear. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1991; 11: 53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris MG, Rich J., Tandrow T. Rotation of spin‐cast hydrogel lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975; 52: 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• White P. Contact lenses and astigmatism. Spectrum 1997; 12: 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Chui WS, Cho P., Brown B. Soft contact lens wear in Hong Kong‐Chinese: Predicting success. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2000; 20: 480–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies IP. Clinical evaluation of the Hydron Ultra T soft toric contact lens: a three month study. ICLC 1990; 17: 280–285.
   Google Scholar
• Lam AKC, Douthwaite WA. Application of a modified keratometer in the study of corneal topography on Chinese subjects. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1996; 16: 130–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds FR, Comstock TL, Reindel WT. A clinical comparison of toric soft contact lens designs. Spectrum 2001; 16: 3s–11s.
   Google Scholar
• Harris MG, Harris KL, Ruddell D. Rotation of lathe‐cut hydrogel lenses on the eye. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976; 53: 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ames KS, Erickson P., Medici L. Factors in fluencing hydrogel toric lens rotation. ICLC 1989; 16: 221–224.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell RB. Contact Lens Practice. Chapter 22, 3rd ed. Springfield : Charles C Thomas, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy T., Szczotka LB, Roberts C. Peripheral corneal contour measured by topography influences soft toric contact lens fitting success. CLAO J 2000; 26: 180–185.
   Google Scholar