Anterior ophthalmic imaging

REFERENCES

• Justice J Jr. Ophthalmic Photography. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Jackman WT, Webster JD. On photographing the retina of the living human eye. Philadelphia Photographer 1886; 23: 275.
   Google Scholar
• Coote J. The Illustrated History of Colour Photography, Fountain Press Ltd, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler ME, Saine PJ, Bennett TJ. Practical Retinal Photography and Digital Imaging Techniques. Boston: Butterworth Heineman, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld A. From image analysis to computer vision: An annotated bibliography, 1955–1979. Comput Vis Image Underst 2001; 84: 298–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technical Advisory Service for Images (TASI): Advice paper on digital cameras. 2004 cited 2004 Jun 10. Available from: URL: http://www.tasi.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Charman WN. Imaging in the 21st Century. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 210–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frame AJ, Undrill PE, Cree MJ, Olson JA, Mchardy KC, Sharp PF, Forrester JV. A comparison of computer‐based classification methods applied to the detection of microaneurysms in ophthalmic fluorescein angiograms. Comput Biol Med 1998; 28: 225–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ege BM, Hejlesen OK, Larsen OV, Moller K, Jennings B, Kerr D, Cavan DA. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using computer based image analysis and statistical classification. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000; 62: 165–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JI, Labree L, Nichols T, Cardenas I. A comparison of digital non‐mydriatic fundus imaging with standard 35‐millimeter slides for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 866–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedberg H, Chen E, Hamberg‐nystrom H. Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 1218–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng ACK, Fan D, Tang E, Lam DSC. Effect of corneal curvature and corneal thickness on the assessment of intraocular pressure using non‐contact tonometry in patients after myopic LASIK surgery. Cornea 2006; 25: 26–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megapixel.net Digital photography concepts cited 2004 Jun 21. Accessed from: URL: http://www.megapixel.net.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DJ, Jacob JS, Tooke JE. The integration of digital camera derived images with a computer based diabetes register for use in retinal screening. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000; 62: 157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu A, Kamal AD, Illahi W, Khan M, Stavrou P, Ryder RE. Is digital image compression acceptable within diabetic retinopathy screening? Diabet Med 2003; 20: 766–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Eikelboom RH, Van saarloos PP. Tele‐ophthalmic screening using digital imaging devices. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1998; 26 Suppl: S9–S11.
   Google Scholar
• Newsom RS, Clover A, Costen MT, Sadler J, Newton J, Luff AJ, Canning CR. Effect of digital image compression on screening for diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 799–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocsis O, Costaridou L, Mandellos G, Lymberopoulos D, Panayiotakis G. Compression assessment based on medical image quality concepts using computer‐generated test images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2003; 71: 105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson RC, Wolffsohn JW. The effect of digital image resolution and compression on anterior eye imaging. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 828–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn J, Purslow C. Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital image analysis. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2003; 26: 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Owen CG, Ellis TJ, Rudnicka AR, Woodward EG. Optimal green (red‐free) digital imaging of conjunctival vasculature. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 234–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polunin GS, Kourenkov VV, Polunina EG. Corneal transparency and measurement of corneal permeability in excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1998; 14 Suppl: S230–S234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’donnell C, Wolffsohn JS. Grading of corneal transparency. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2004; 27: 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman DS, Duncan DD, Munoz B, West SK, Schein OD. Digital image capture and automated analysis of posterior capsular opacification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 1715–1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin A, Stern G. Correlation between pterygium size and induced corneal astigmatism. Cornea 1998; 17: 28–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockwin O, Lerman S, Ohrloff C. Investigations on lens transparency and its disturbances by microdensitometric analysis of Scheimpflug photographs. Curr Eye Res 1984; 3: 15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener A, Laser H. Image‐analysis and Scheimpflug‐photography in the anterior segment of the eye—a review article. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2001; 218: 67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubbleman M, Van der heijde GL, Weeber HA, Vrensen GFJM. Changes in the internal structure of the human crystalline lens with age and accommodation. Vision Res 2003; 43: 2363–2375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GTH, Brown NAP, Shun‐shin GA. Light scatter from the central human cornea. Eye 1990; 4: 584–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soya K, Amano S, Oshika T. Quantification of simulated corneal haze by measuring back‐scattered light. Ophthalmic Res 2002; 34: 380–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de pol C, Soya K, Hwang DG. Objective assessment of transient corneal haze and its relation to visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132: 204–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan AJ, Harper J, Hosking SL, Gilmartin B. The effect of corneal thickness and corneal curvature on pneumatonometer measurements. Curr Eye Res 2002; 25: 107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz JF, Strenk SA, Strenk LM, Semmlow JL. Scheimpflug and high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior segment: a comparative study. J Opt Soc Am A—Opt Image Sci Vis 2004; 21: 346–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 892–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Fotouhi A. Anterior chamber depth measurement with A‐scan ultrasonography, Orbscan II and IOLMaster. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 900–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Huang AJ, Pflugfelder SC. Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan corneal topography system. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 774–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejia‐barbosa Y, Malacara‐hernandez D. A review of methods for measuring corneal topography. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 87: 240–253.
   Google Scholar
• Freegard TJ. The physical basis of transparency of the normal cornea. Eye 1997; 11: 465–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnke M, Masters BR. Confocal microscopy of the cornea. Prog Ret Eye Res 1999; 18: 553–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh HD, El‐agha MS, Petroll WM, Jester JV. Specular microscopy, confocal microscopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy —Diagnostic tools of the past quarter century. Cornea 2000; 19: 712–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervo T, Moilanen J. In vivo confocal microscopy for evaluation of wound healing following corneal refractive surgery. Prog Ret Eye Res 2003; 22: 339–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper M, Morgado AM, Quadrado MJ, Van best JA. Corneal cell density measurement in vivo by scanning slit confocal microscopy: Method and validation. Ophthalmic Res 2004; 36: 270–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller‐pedersen T, Vogel M, Li HF, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Quantification of stromal thinning, epithelial thickness, and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy using in vivo confocal microscopy. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 360–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser BJ, Ignacio TS, Wang YM, Taban M, Graff JM, Sweet P, Chen Z, Chuck RS. In vitro measurement of rabbit corneal epithelial thickness using ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography. Vet Ophthalmol 2005; 8: 85–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano K, Ito Y, Suzuki T, Kojima T, Kachi S, Miyake Y. Optical coherence tomography for the noninvasive evaluation of the cornea. Cornea 2001; 20: 281–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King‐smith PE, Fink BA, Fogt N, Nichols KK, Hill RM, Wilson GS. The thickness of the human precorneal tear film: evidence from reflection spectra. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 3348–3359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Jones L. Precorneal and pre‐ and post‐lens tear film thickness measured indirectly with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 2524–2528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng YW, Simpson TL. Comparison of human central cornea and limbus in vivo using optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 416–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baikoff G, Lutun E, Ferraz C, Wei J. Analysis of the eye’s anterior segment with optical coherence tomography. Static and dynamic study. J Fr Ophtalmol 2005; 28: 343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerauf H, Scholz C, Koch P, Engelhardt R, Laqua H, Birngruber R. Trans‐scleral optical coherence tomography—A new imaging method for the anterior segment of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 816–819.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urbak SF. Ultrasound biomicroscopy. I. Precision of measurements. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76: 447–455.
   Google Scholar
• Urbak SF. Ultrasound biomicroscopy. III. Accuracy and agreement of measurements. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77: 293–297.
   Google Scholar
• Urbak SF, Pedersen JK, Thorsen TT. Ultrasound biomicroscopy. II. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76: 546–549.
   Google Scholar
• Santodomingo‐rubido J, Mallen EAH, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. A new non‐contact optical device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 458–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman G, Pesudovs K. The impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005; 83: 439–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pavlin CJ, Sherar MD, Foster FS. Subsurface ultrasound microscopic imaging of the intact eye. Ophthalmology 1990; 97: 244–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavline CJ, Harasiewicz K, Foster FS. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of anterior segment structures in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 113: 381–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk A, Pautke C, Wiener E, Ploder O, Neff A. A novel high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging microscopy coil as an alternative to the multislice computed tomography in postoperative imaging of orbital fractures and computer‐based volume measurement. J Oral Maxilofacial Surg 2005; 63: 492–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deramo VA, Shah GK, Baumal CR, Fineman MS, Correa ZM, Benson WE, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Augsburger JJ. The role of ultrasound biomicroscopy in ocular trauma. Tr Am Ophthalmol Soc 1998; 96: 355–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ben simon GJ, Annunziata CC, Fink J, Villablanca P, Mccann JD, Goldberg RA. Rethinking orbital imaging—Establishing guidelines for interpreting orbital imaging studies and evaluating their predictive value in patients with orbital tumors. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 2196–2207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sa HS, Kyung SE, Oh SY. Extraocular muscle imaging in complex strabismus Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2005; 36: 487–493.
   Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Jones CE, Schmid KL, Pritchard N, Pope JM, Strugnell WE, Riley RA. Eye shape in emmetropia and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3380–3386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CE, Atchison DA, Meder R, Pope JM. Refractive index distribution and optical properties of the isolated human lens measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Vision Res 2005; 45: 2352–2366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar