Rethinking contact lens associated keratitis

REFERENCES

• Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 30th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Tullo AB. The size, location and clinical severity of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 519–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Tullo AB. Incidence and morbidity of hospital‐presenting corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Clin Exp Optom 2005; 88: 232–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N, Brennan NA, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Tullo AB. Risk factors for the development of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3136–3143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Whiting MA, Tullo AB. Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB. Impact of differences in diagnostic criteria when determining the incidence of contact lens associated keratitis. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 152–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aasuri MK, Venkata N, Kumar VM. Differential diagnosis of microbial keratitis and contact lens‐induced peripheral ulcer. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S60–S62.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng KH, Leung SL, Hoekman HW, Beekhuis WH, Mulder PG, Geerards AJ, Kijlstra A. Incidence of contact‐lens‐associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity. Lancet 1999; 354: 181–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio EC, Glynn RJ, Schein OD, Seddon JM, Shannon MJ, Scardino VA, Kenyon KR. The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily‐wear and extended‐wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 779–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Kunimoto DY, Gopinathan U, Athmanathan S, Garg P, Rao GN. Evaluation of corneal scraping smear examination methods in the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a survey of eight years of laboratory experience. Cornea 2002; 21: 643–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiszig SM, Efron N. Microbial flora in eyes of current and former contact lens wearers. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 1156–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam DS, Houang E, Fan DS, Lyon D, Seal D, Wong E. Incidence and risk factors for microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: comparison with Europe and North America. Eye 2002; 16: 608–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman BA, Mondino BJ. Microbial keratitis. In: Efron N, ed. The Cornea: Its Examination in Contact Lens Practice. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann; 2001. p-54.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Edwards K, Keay L, Naduvilath T, Dart JKG, Brian G, Sweeney D, Holden BA. The incidence of contact lens associated microbial keratitis in Australia. ARVO Abstracts 2005; 46: E‐abstract 5025.
   Google Scholar
• Schein OD, Mcnally JJ, Katz J, Chalmers RL, Tielsch JM, Alfonso E. The incidence of microbial keratitis among wearers of a 30‐day silicone hydrogel extended‐wear contact lens. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 2172–2179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein RM, Clinch TE, Cohen EJ, Genvert GI, Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR. Infected vs. sterile corneal infiltrates in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105: 632–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Dart JK, Minassian D. Risk factors with contact lens related suppurative keratitis. CLAO J 1993; 19: 204–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Covey M, Sankaridurg PR, Vajdic C, Holden BA, Sharma S, Ramachandran L, Willcox MD, Rao GN. Clinical characterization of corneal infiltrative events observed with soft contact lens wear. Cornea 2003; 22: 435–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant T, Chong MS, Vajdic C, Swarbrick HA, Gauthier C, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. Contact lens induced peripheral ulcers during hydrogel contact lens wear. CLAO J 1998; 24: 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz PH, Bouchard CS, Mathers WD, Goldman J, Shields WJ, Cavanagh HD. Corneal infiltrates associated with disposable extended wear soft contact lenses: a report of nine cases. CLAO J 1990; 16: 269–272.
   Google Scholar
• Suchecki JK, Ehlers WH, Donshik PC. Peripheral corneal infiltrates associated with contact lens wear. CLAO J 1996; 22: 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Reddy MK, Sankaridurg PR, Buddi R, Sharma S, Willcox MD, Sweeney DF, Rao GN. Contact lens‐induced peripheral ulcers with extended wear of disposable hydrogel lenses: histopathologic observations on the nature and type of corneal infiltrate. Cornea 1999; 18: 538–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Stapleton F, Willcox MD. The causes of and cures for contact lens‐induced peripheral ulcer. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S63–S66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Josephson JE, Caffery BE. Infiltrative keratitis in hydrogel lens wearers. Int Contact Lens Clin 1979; 6: 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Baum J, Donshik PC. Corneal infiltrates associated with soft contact lens wear. Cornea 2004; 23: 421–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr JT. Corneal infiltrates: What’s the difference? Contact Lens Spectrum 2004; 19: 11.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson SE. Seven‐day extended wear and 30‐day continuous wear of high oxygen transmissibility soft silicone hydrogel contact lenses: a randomized 1‐year study of 504 patients. CLAO J 2001; 27: 125–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB. Can sub‐types of contact lens associated corneal infiltrative events be clinically differentiated? Cornea 2006; 25: 540–544.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N, Carney LG. Oxygen levels beneath the closed eyelid. Invest Ophthalmo Vis Sci 1979; 18: 93–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tighe B. Silicone hydrogels: structure, properties and behaviour. In: Sweeney DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels. Continuous Wear Contact Lenses, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Butterworth‐Heinemann; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. Epithelial split associated with wear of a silicone hydrogel contact lens. CLAO J 2001; 27: 231–233.
   Google Scholar
• O’hare N, Stapleton F, Naduvilath T, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. Interaction between the contact lens and the ocular surface in the etiology of superior epithelial arcuate lesions. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002; 506(Pt B): 973–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson G, O’leary DJ, Holden BA. Cell content of tears following overnight wear of a contact lens. Curr Eye Res 1989; 8: 329–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon A, Kracher GP. Corneal infiltrates and extended‐wear contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc 1985; 56: 198–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein HA, Slatt BJ, Stein RM, Freeman MI. Care systems for soft lenses. In: Stein HA, Slatt BJ, Stein RM, Freeman MI, eds. Fitting Guide For Rigid And Soft Contact Lenses. A Practical Approach. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Heiler DJ, Gambacorta‐hoffman S, Groemminger SF, Jonasse MS. The concentric distribution of protein on patient‐worn hydrogel lenses. CLAO J 1991; 17: 249–251.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N. Contact Lens Complications. Edinburgh: Butterworth‐Heinemann; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Keay L, Edwards K, Brian G, Naduvilath T, Stapleton F. Evaluation of surveillance methods for an epidemiological study of contact lens related microbial keratitis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004; 32: 349–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquilino WS. Telephone versus face‐to‐face interviewing for household drug use surveys. Int J Addict 1992; 27: 71–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan PB. A healthcheck on the UK contact lens market. Optician 2002; 223 (5854): 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N. A decade of contact lens prescribing trends in the United Kingdom (1996–2005). Contact Lens Ant Eye2006; 29: 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Senn SJ, Samson WB. Estimating hospital catchment populations. Statistician 1982; 31: 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Stretton S, Naduvilath TJ, Rao GN. Microbial keratitis in prospective studies of extended wear with disposable hydrogel contact lenses. Cornea 2005; 24: 156–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio EC, Abelson M. Complications and symptoms in disposable extended wear lenses compared with conventional soft daily wear and soft extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1993; 19: 31–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson SE, Montan PG. The annualized incidence of contact lens induced keratitis in Sweden and its relation to lens type and wear schedule: results of a 3‐month prospective study. CLAO J 1994; 20: 225–230.
   Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR, Carnt N, Edwards K, Stretton S, Stapleton F. Microbial keratitis and vision loss with contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S131–S134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Covey M, Sweeney DF, Terry R, Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA. Hypoxic effects on the anterior eye of high‐Dk soft contact lens wearers are negligible. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 95–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dart JK, Stapleton F, Minassian D. Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis. Lancet 1991; 338: 650–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Poggio EC, Seddon JM, Kenyon KR. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily‐wear and extended‐wear soft contact lenses. A case‐control study. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 773–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Anal 1994; 14: 1101–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelle E, Ingrassia M, Mammone T, Marenus K, Maes D. Protection against cigarette smoke‐induced damage to intact transformed rabbit corneal cells by N‐acetyl‐L‐cysteine. Cell Biol Toxicol 1998; 14: 253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu PK, Pimm PE, Shephard RJ, Silverman F. The effect of cigarette smoke on the human tear film. Can J Ophthalmol 1978; 13: 22–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopori ML, Kozak W. Immunomodulatory effects of cigarette smoke. J Neuroimmunol 1998; 83: 148–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley CG, Riggle A, Tuel JA. Association of giant papillary conjunctivitis with seasonal allergies. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 192–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheme EIS. http://www.eiss.org Accessed on November 25, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mcnally JJ, Chalmers RL, Mckenney CD, Robirds S. Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events with 30‐night continuous wear of silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S153–S156.
   Google Scholar
• Radford CF, Bacon AS, Dart JK, Minassian DC. Risk factors for acanthamoeba keratitis in contact lens users: a case‐control study. Br Med J 1995; 310: 1567–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford CF, Minassian DC, Dart JK. Acanthamoeba keratitis in England and Wales: incidence, outcome, and risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 536–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siderov J, Tiu AL. Variability of measurements of visual acuity in a large eye clinic. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77: 673–676.
   Google Scholar
• El‐maghraby A, Salah T, Waring GO 3rd, Klyce S, Ibrahim O. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 447–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK, Durrie DS, Gordon M, Michelson MA, Thompson VM, Berkeley RB, Schein OD, Steinert RF. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1512–1522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert RF, Hersh PS. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in‐situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1998; 96: 197–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar