Active treatments for amblyopia: a review of the methods and evidence base

REFERENCES

• Levi DM, Klein S. Hyperacuity and amblyopia. Nature 1982; 298 (5871): 268–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess RF, Holliday IE. The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia. Vision Res 1992; 32: 1319–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell ER, Mitchell DE, Keith CG. Contrast thresholds for sine gratings of children with amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 782–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson M, Sjöstrand J. Contrast sensitivity and acuity relationships in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1988; 72: 44–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA. The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis 2003; 3: 380–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess RF, Field DJ. Is the spatial deficit in strabismic amblyopia due to loss of cells or an uncalibrated disarray of cells? Vision Res 1994; 34: 3397–3406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett BT, Pacey IE, Bradley A, Thibos LB, Morrill P. Non‐veridical visual perception in human amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1555–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sireteanu R, Baumer CC, Sarbu C, Iftime A. Spatial and temporal misperceptions in amblyopic vision. Strabismus 2007; 15: 45–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kani W. Stereopsis and spatial perception in amblyopes and uncorrected ametropes. Br J Ophthalmol 1978; 62: 756–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CB, Zhou J, Lu ZL, Feng L, Zhou Y. Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia. J Vis 2009; 9: 17.1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowdon SK, Stewart‐brown SL. Preschool vision screening. Health Technol Assess 1997; 1: 1–83.
   Google Scholar
• Packwood EA, Cruz OA, Rychwalski PJ, Keech RV. The psychosocial effects of amblyopia study. J AAPOS 1999; 13: 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Van de graaf ES, Van de sterre GW, Van kempen‐du saar H, Simonsz B, Looman CWN, Simonsz HJ. Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ): clinical evaluation in a historic cohort. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245: 1589–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felius J, Beauchamp GR, Stager DR, Van de graaf ES, Simonsz HJ. The amblyopia and strabismus questionnaire: English translation, validation and subscales. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 305–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahi JS, Cumberland PM, Peckham DS. Does amblyopia affect educational, health and social outcomes? Findings from 1958 British birth cohort. BMJ 2006; 332 (7545): 820–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M. Does amblyopia really matter? BMJ 2006; 332: 824.
   Google Scholar
• Grant S, Melmoth DR, Morgan MJ, Finlay AL. Prehension deficits in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 1139–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy S, Davis H, Buckley D. Is stereopsis linked to hand‐eye coordination? Br Orthopt J 2001; 58: 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hrisos S, Clarke MP, Wright CM. The emotional impact of amblyopia treatment in preschool children. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 1550–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, Brown B. The effect of amblyopia on fine motor skills in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 594–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Isenbert SJ. The relationship between stereopsis and visual acuity after occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 2088–2092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenoir M, Musch E, La grange N. Ecological relevance of stereopsis in one‐handed ball catching. Percept Mot Skills 1999; 89: 495–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazyn LI, Lenoir M, Montagne G, Savelsbergh GJ. The contribution of stereo vision to one‐handed catching. Exp Brain Res 2004; 157: 383–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazyn LI, Lenoir M, Montagne G, Delaey C, Savelsbergh GJ. Stereo vision enhances the learning of a catching skill. Exp Brain Res 2007; 179: 723–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang TM, Hsu W‐M, Chou C‐K, Tsai S‐Y, Chou P. Impact of stereopsis on quality of life. Eye 2005; 19: 540–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommila V, Tarkkanen A. Incidence of loss of vision in the healthy eye in amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65: 575–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Impact of patching and atropine treatment on the child and family in the amblyopia treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 1625–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, Brown B. Effect of amblyopia on self esteem in children. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85:1074–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill E. Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Publications. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/publications/synopses/cp69.pdf Accessed 29th January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Loudon LE, Simonsz HJ. The history of the treatment of amblyopia. Strabismus 2005; 13: 93–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Single‐cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J Neurophysiol 1963; 26: 1003–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levay S, Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1980; 191: 1–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore C, Garey LJ, Vital‐durand F. The physiological effects of monocular deprivation and their reversal in the monkey's visual cortex. J Physiol 1978; 283: 223–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 1029–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotton K, Powell C, Voros G, Hatt SR. Interventions for unilateral refractive amblyopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 4: CD005137.
   Google Scholar
• Shotton K, Elliott S. Interventions for strabismic amblyopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 2: CD006461.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Shotton K. Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalisation for amblyopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 4: CD006460.
   Google Scholar
• Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 268–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Randomised trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17-years. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 437–447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller JR, Cibis L. Clinical results with active amblyopia treatment. Am Orthopt J 1960; 10: 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rados WT, Sellitto AM, Angiuoli DN, Shateran ET. Observations on outpatient pleoptics. Am Orthopt J 1966; 16: 111–127.
   Google Scholar
• Verlee DL, Iacobucci I. Pleoptics versus occlusion of the sound eye in the management of strabismic amblyopia with eccentric fixation. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 63: 244–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veronneau‐troutman S, Dayanoff SS, Stohler T. Conventional occlusion vs pleoptics in the treatment of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 78: 117–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von noorden GK, Springer F, Romano P, Parks M. Home therapy for amblyopia. Am Orthopt J 1970; 20: 46–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gould A, Fishkoff D, Galin MA. Active visual stimulation: a method of treatment of amblyopia in the older patient. Am Orthopt J 1970; 20: 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Frantz KA. Rationale for refractive correction, occlusion and active therapy for amblyopia treatment. J Behav Optom 1995; 6: 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman A. Treatment of amblyopia without full refractive correction or occlusion. J Behav Optom 1995; 6: 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lee R. Active vision therapy on an adult strabismic amblyope. J Behav Optom 1999; 10: 115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR. Treatment dose‐response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3048–3054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wick B, Wingard M, Cotter S, Scheiman M. Anisometropic amblyopia: is the patient ever too old to treat? Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 866–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francois J, James M. Comparative study of amblyopic treatment. Am Orthopt J 1955; 5: 61–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non‐near activities during patching therapy for amblyopia. J AAPOS 2005; 9: 129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of near versus distance activities while patching for amblyopia in children aged 3 to less than 7-years. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 2071–2078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell FW, Hess RF, Watson PG. Preliminary results of a physiologically based treatment of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1978; 62: 748–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willshaw HE, Malmheden A, Clarke J, Williams A, Dean L. Experience with the CAM vision stimulator: Preliminary report. Br J Ophthalmol 1980; 64: 339–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers JD, Pratt‐johnson JA, Tillson G. A pilot study of children with amblyopia treated by the gratings method. Br J Ophthalmol 1980; 64: 342–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanson DR, Ciuffreda KJ. Results of intensive CAM grating treatment in a strabismic amblyope. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982; 59: 511–514.
   Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Goldner K, Connelly R. Lack of positive results of a physiologically based treatment of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1980; 64: 607–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith CG, Howell ER, Mitchell DE, Smith S. Clinical trial of the use of rotating grating patterns in the treatment of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1980; 64: 597–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytla ME, Labow‐daily LS. Evaluation of the CAM treatment for amblyopia: a controlled study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 20: 400–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doba AT. Cambridge stimulator treatment for amblyopia. An evaluation of 80 consecutive cases treated by this method. Aust J Ophthalmol 1981; 9: 121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Woo GC, Dalziel CC. A pilot study of contrast sensitivity assessment of the cam treatment of amblyopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1981; 59: 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela PU. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia I: changes during cam treatment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1986; 64: 344–351.
   Google Scholar
• Garzia RP. Efficacy of vision therapy in amblyopia: a literature review. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 393–404.
   Google Scholar
• Verma A, Singh D. Active vision therapy for pseudophakic amblyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 1089–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampf U, Shamshinova A, Kaschtschenko T, Mascolus W, Pillunat L, Haase W. Long‐term application of computer‐based pleoptics in home therapy: selected results of a prospective multicenter study. Strabismus 2008; 16: 148–159.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb R, Wallace L. Syntonic phototherapy. J Behav Optom 2001; 12: 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace LB. The theory and practice of syntonic phototherapy: A review. J Optom Vis Dev 2009; 40: 73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Spitler HR. The Syntonic Principle. Pennsylvania: Science Press Printing Company, 1941.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell DE. A special role for binocular visual input during development and as a component of occlusion therapy for treatment of amblyopia. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2008; 26: 425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker DH, Meese TS, Mansouri B, Hess RF. Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 5332–5338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri B, Thompson B, Hess RF. Measurement of suprathreshold binocular interactions in amblyopia. Vision Res 2008; 48: 2775–2784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedamurthy I, Suttle CM, Alexander J, Asper LJ. A psychophysical study of human binocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systems. Vision Res 2008; 48: 1522–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YZ, Thibos LN, Bradley A. Effects of refractive error on detection acuity and resolution acuity in peripheral vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 2134–2143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 2010 Feb 15. [Epub ahead of print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen AH. Monocular fixation in a binocular field. J Am Optom Assoc 1981; 52: 801–806.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eastgate RM, Griffiths GD, Waddingham PE, Moody ADR, Butler TKH, Cobb SV, Comaish IF et al. Modified virtual reality technology for treatment of amblyopia. Eye 2006; 20: 370–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddingham PE, Butler TKH, Cobb SV, Moody ADR, Comaish IF, Haworth SM, Gregson RM et al. Preliminary results from the use of the novel interactive binocular treatment (I‐BiT) system in the treatment of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Eye 2006; 20: 375–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary M, Moody AD, Buchanan A, Stewart H, Dutton GN. Assessment of a computer‐based treatment for older amblyopes: the Glasgow pilot study. Eye 2009; 23: 124–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper J. Computerised vision therapy for home and office treatment of accommodative and vergence disorders and amblyopia. J Behav Optom 2007; 18: 88.
   Google Scholar
• Polat U, Ma‐naim T, Belkin M, Sagi D. Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 6692–6697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat U, Ma‐naim T, Spierer A. Treatment of children with amblyopia by perceptual learning. Vision Res 2009; 49: 2599–2603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press LJ. Vision therapy as perceptual learning: Insights from the Vision Sciences Society. J Behav Optom 2007; 18: 96–99.
   Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Li R. Perceptual learning as a potential treatment for amblyopia: a mini‐review. Vision Res 2009; 49: 2535–2549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P, Chen J, Fu J, Chien K, Lu D. A pilot study of anisometropic amblyopia improved in adults and children by perceptual learning: an alternative treatment to patching. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008; 28: 422–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Huang C, Xu P, Tao L, Qiu Z, Li X, Zhong‐lin L. Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Vision Res 2006; 46: 739–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li RW, Young KG, Hoenig P, Levi DM. Perceptual learning improves visual performance in juvenile amblyopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3161–3168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li RW, Provost A, Levi DM. Extended perceptual learning results in substantial recovery of positional acuity and visual acuity in juvenile amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 5046–5051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press LJ. The interface between ophthalmology and optometric vision therapy. J Behav Optom 2002; 13: 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper J. Deflating the rubber duck. J Behav Optom 1998; 9: 115–119.
   Google Scholar