Comparison of corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam, the PARK1 and an ultrasonic pachymeter

REFERENCES

• American Academy of Ophthalmology. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia and astigmatism. Ophthalmic procedure preliminary assessment. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 422–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price FW Jr, Koller DL, Price MO. Central corneal pachymetry in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 2216–2220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC, Liu Z, Feuer W, Verm A. Corneal thickness indices discriminate between keratoconus and contact lens‐induced corneal thinning. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 2336–2341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta‐analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000; 44: 367–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stodtmeister R. Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76: 319–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study; baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open angle glaucoma; the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 714–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourges JL, Alfonsi N, Laliberté JF, Chagnon M, Renard G, Legeais JM, Brunette I. Average 3‐dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2064–2071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López‐miguel A, Nieto JC, Díez‐cuenca M, Piñero DP, Maldonado MJ. Agreement of non‐contact pachymetry after LASIK: comparison of combined scanning‐slit/Placido disc topography and specular microscopy. Eye (Lond) 2010; 24: 1064–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutelspacher SC, Serbecic N, Scheuerle AF. Assessment of central corneal thickness using OCT, ultrasound, optical low coherence reflectometry and Scheimpflug pachymetry. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010 Sep 21. pii: D25A4430‐ED42‐43FE‐8B53‐1E36C5A013A0. [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaloy J, Vidal MT, Villada JR, Artola A, Alió JL. Comparison of four corneal pachymetry techniques in corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2004; 20: 29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallet G. Comparison of optical and ultrasound central corneal pachymetry. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2001; 281: 35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, Schwartz S, Ken‐dror G, Avni I, Zadok D. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low‐coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 1729–1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Mehravaran Sh. Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1701–1707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 892–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho T, Cheng AC, Rao SK, Lau S, Leung CK, Lam DS. Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1177–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam SM, Lee HK, Kim EK, Seo KY. Comparison of corneal thickness after the instillation of topical anesthetics: proparacaine versus oxybuprocaine. Cornea 2006; 25: 51–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira LB, Kasetsuwan N, Sanchez D, Shah SS, Labree L, Mcdonnell PJ. Toxicity of topical anesthetic agents to human keratocytes in vivo. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 975–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De castro A, Rosales P, Marcos S. Tilt and decentration of intraocular lenses in vivo from Purkinje and Scheimpflug imaging. Validation study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 418–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al‐mezaine HS, Al‐amro SA, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al‐obeidan S. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry. Int Ophthalmol 2008; 28: 333–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42: 297–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watters GA, Owens H. Evaluation of mild, moderate, and advanced keratoconus using ultrasound pachometry and the EyeSys videokeratoscope. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 640–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Meisler DM, Tang M, Lu AT, Thakrar V, Reiser BJ, Huang D. Keratoconus diagnosis with optical coherence tomography pachymetry mapping. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 2159–2166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar