Forward and backward adaptive effects in global flash multifocal electroretinogram stimulation

REFERENCES

• Smith DC, Keating D, Parks S, Evans AL. An instrument to investigate temporal processing mechanisms with the multifocal ERG. J Med Eng Technol 2002; 26: 147–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Viswanathan S. Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: implications for the human response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1673–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng YF, Chan HH, Chu PH, Siu AW, To CH, Beale BA, Gilger BC et al. Pharmacologically defined components of the normal porcine multifocal ERG. Doc Ophthalmol 2008; 116: 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutter E. The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 100: 49–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan HL, Brown B. Multifocal ERG changes in glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 306–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan HH, Brown B. Pilot study of the multifocal electroretinogram in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 1147–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmowski AM, Ruprecht KW. Follow up in open angle glaucoma. A comparison of static perimetry and the fast stimulation mfERG. Multifocal ERG follow‐up in open angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 2004; 108: 55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz D, Perlman I, Percicot CL, Lambrou GN, Ofri R. Functional damage to inner and outer retinal cells in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 3675–3684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutter EE, Shimada Y, Li Y, Bearse MA. Mapping inner retinal function through enhancement of adaptation components in the M‐ERG. Vis Sci Appl OSA Tech Dig Ser 1999; 1: 52–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bearse MA, Sutter EE, Stamper RL. Detection of glaucomatous dysfunction using a global flash multifocal electroretinogram (mERG) paradigm. Vis Sci Appl OSA Tech Dig Ser 2001; 3: 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sutter EE, Bearse MA, Stamper RL, Lambrou GN, Percicot CL, Ofri R, Raz D. Monitoring retinal ganglion cell function with the MERG: recent advances. Vis Sci Appl OSA Tech Dig Ser 2001; 3: 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Chu PH, Chan HH, Ng YF, Brown B, Siu AW, Beale BA, Gilger BC et al. Porcine global flash multifocal electroretinogram: possible mechanisms for the glaucomatous changes in contrast response function. Vision Res 2008; 48: 1726–1734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortune B, Bearse MA Jr, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA. Selective loss of an oscillatory component from temporal retinal multifocal ERG responses in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2638–2647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmowski AM, Allgayer R, Heinemann‐vernaleken B, Ruprecht KW. Multifocal electroretinogram with a multiflash stimulation technique in open‐angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res 2002; 34: 83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu PH, Chan HH, Brown B. Glaucoma detection is facilitated by luminance modulation of the global flash multifocal electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 929–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada Y, Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE. Multifocal electroretinograms combined with periodic flashes: direct responses and induced components. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 132–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu PH, Chan HH, Brown B. Luminance‐modulated adaptation of global flash mfERG: fellow eye losses in asymmetric glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 2626–2633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada Y, Li Y, Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE, Fung W. Assessment of early retinal changes in diabetes using a new multifocal ERG protocol. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 414–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigl B, Brown B, Lovie‐kitchin J, Swann P. Adaptation responses in early age‐related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 4722–4727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lung JC, Chan HH. Effects of luminance combinations on the characteristics of the global flash multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 1117–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazinani BA, Repas T, Weinberger AW, Vobig MA, Walter P. Amplitude calculation in multifocal ERG: comparison of repeatability in 30-Hz flicker and first order kernel stimulation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245: 338–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man. I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 1992; 32: 433–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornschein H, Gunter R. The double‐flash ERG in retinal ischemia. Vision Res 1964; 4: 423–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton WA. Dark‐adaptation and the regeneration of rhodopsin. J Physiol 1961; 156: 166–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood DC, Seiple W, Holopigian K, Greenstein V. A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full‐field ERGs. Vis Neurosci 1997; 14: 533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood DC. Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000; 19: 607–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearse MA Jr, Han Y, Schneck ME, Adams AJ. Retinal function in normal and diabetic eyes mapped with the slow flash multifocal electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 296–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford BH. Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1947; 134: 283–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerth C, Sutter EE, Werner JS. mfERG response dynamics of the aging retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 4443–4450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutter EE. Effects of feed forward and feedback mechanisms in the human retina revealed by the multifocal ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: E‐Abstract 1797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar