Clinical evaluation of the L80 autorefractometer

REFERENCES

• Rassow B,Wesemann W.Automatic infrared refractors.Ophthalmology1984; 91: 10–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wood MG,Mazow ML,Prager TC.Accuracy of the Nidek ARK900 objective refractor in comparison with retinoscopy in children ages 3 to 18-years.Am J Ophthalmol1998; 126: 100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcbrien NA,Adams DW.A longitudinal investigation of adult‐onset and adult progression of myopia in an occupational group. Refractive and biometric findings.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1997; 38: 321–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salchow DJ,Zirm ME,Stieldorf C,Parisi A.Comparison of objective and subjective refraction before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.J Cataract Refract Surg1999; 25: 827–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallen EA,Wolffsohn JS,Gilmartin B,Tsujimura S.Clinical evaluation of the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 autorefractor in adults.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt2001; 21: 101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannon RE.A new automated subjective optometer.Am J Optom Physiol Opt1977; 54: 433–438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyson C.A clinical study of the autorefractor, an antomatic refracting device.Can J Ophthalmol1977; 12: 29–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas CJ,Anderson DR,Briese FW.Is the Autorefractor reading closest to manifest refraction? A comparison of the patient's previous spectacles and the 6600 Autorefractor reading.Arch Ophthalmol1978; 96: 997–998.
   Google Scholar
• Wood ICJ,Papas E,Burghardt D,Hardwick G.A clinical evaluation of the Nidek Autorefractor.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt1984; 4: 169–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcbrien NA,Millodot M.Clinical evaluation of the Canon Autoref R‐1.Am J Optom Physiol Opt1985; 62: 786–792.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mccaghrey GE,Matthews FE.Clinical evaluation of a range of autorefractors.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt1993; 13: 129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinge B,Midelfart A,Jacobsen G.Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR1000 autorefractor.Br J Ophthalmol1996; 80: 35–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott M,Simpson T,Richter D,Fonn D.Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: a comparison of the NikonNRK‐8000, the Nidek AR‐1000 and subjective refraction.Optom Vis Sci1997; 74: 434–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullimore MA,Fusaro RE,Adams CW.The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction.Optom Vis Sci1998; 75: 617–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies LN,Mallen EA,Wolffsohn JS,Gilmartin B.Clinical evaluation of the Shin‐Nippon NVision‐K 5001/Grand Seiko WR‐5100K autorefractor.Optom Vis Sci2003; 80: 320–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary G,Spalton DJ,Patel PM,Lin PF,Marshall J.Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin‐Nippon NVision‐K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt2009; 29: 173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard L,Davies LN.Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM‐5500.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt2010; 30: 143–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang NC,Gray LS,Winn B,Pugh JR.Clinical evaluation of patient tolerance to autorefractor prescriptions.Clin Exp Optom1998; 81: 112–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hament WJ,Nabar VA,Nuijts RM.Repeatability and validity of Zywave aberrometer measurements.J Cataract Refract Surg2002; 28: 2135–2141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon TO,West RW,Gasser W,Kenmore T.Measurement of refractive errors in young myopes using the COAS Shack‐Hartmann Aberrometer.Optom Vis Sci2003; 80: 6–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez P,Navarro R,González L,Hernández JL.Accuracy and reproducibility of Zywave, Tracey, and experimental aberrometers.J Refract Surg2004; 20: 810–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobos MJ,Twa MD,Bullimore MA.An evaluation of the Bausch & Lomb Zywave aberrometer.Clin Exp Optom2009; 92: 238–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS,O'donnell C,Charman WN,Gilmartin B.Simultaneous continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the modified Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 autorefractor.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt2004; 24: 142–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Win‐hall DM,Ostrin LA,Kasthurirangan S,Glasser A.Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer.Optom Vis Sci2007; 84: 879–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN,Wheeler W,Horner D.Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error.Optom Vis Sci1997; 74: 367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM,Altman DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet1986; 1: 307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M,Logan N.Optometry: Science Techniques and Clinical Management. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2009. p 195.
   Google Scholar
• Mirshahi A,Bühren J,Gerhardt D,Kohnen T.In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann‐Shack aberrometry.J Cataract Refract Surg2003; 29: 2295–2301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar