Using Educative Curriculum Materials to Support Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Curricular Planning: A Comparison Between Two Different Forms of Support

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, C. J. (2009). Using reform-based criteria to support the development of preservice elementary teachers’ pedagogical design capacity for analyzing science curriculum materials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (in press). Supporting preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptation of science curriculum materials using educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, R. V. J. (1992). Beginning teacher curriculum decision making, personal teaching metaphors, and teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 8(3), 239–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania (CPRE RR-43).
   Google Scholar
• Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 227–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ critique of instructional materials for science. Science Education, 90(2), 348–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginners moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93(4), 745–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Smithey, J., & Petish, D. (2004). Designing an online learning environment for new elementary science teachers: Supports for learning to teach. In Y. Kafai, W. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. Nixon, & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (p. 594). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, C., & Davis, E. A. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ reflection on narrative images of inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 219–243.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2009). Developing curriculum vision and trust: Changes in teachers’ curriculum strategies. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 321–337). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2004). Curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teacher learning? Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy and Center on English Learning & Achievement (CELA).
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G. M., & Behm, S. L. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers’ analysis of mathematics instructional materials. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4), 48–62.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2005). Digest of education statistics, 2007. Retrieved July 22, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1991). Professional teaching standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 331–355.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. R. (1997). Teaching alike: A cross-case analysis of first-career and second-career beginning teachers’ instructional convergence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(3), 341–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 19(3), 315–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, R., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., Gunckel, K., Smith, E., Covitt, B., Bae, M., Enfield, M., et al. (2008). Helping elementary pre-service teachers learn to use science curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92, 345–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (1999). Changing our teaching: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science teacher education (pp. 163–198). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D., & Neale, D. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., Place, N. A., Martin, S. D., & Grossman, P. L. (2006). Curriculum materials for elementary reading: Shackles and scaffolds for four beginning teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 93–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, W. W. (1979). Twenty years of science curriculum development: A look back. Review of Research in Education, 7, 282–308.
   Google Scholar