82
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

40th Anniversary of Curriculum Inquiry—Part II B: The Changing “Tradition” of Reviews in Curriculum Inquiry

, , &
Pages 335-386 | Published online: 07 Jan 2015

References

  • Aitken, J. (1995). The masquerade. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(2), 121–131.
  • Apple, M. (1977). Politics and the national curriculum policy: An essay review of documents from the N.I.E.’s Curriculum Development Task Force. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(4), 355–362.
  • Apple, M. (1979). Curriculum and reproduction. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(3), 251–257.
  • Apple, M. (2010). Fly and the fly bottle: On Dwayne Huebner, the uses of language, and the nature of the curriculum field. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 95–103.
  • Berk, L. (1976). Editorial. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(2), 99–100.
  • Berk, L. (1977). Editorial. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(1), 1–2.
  • Bode, B. (1975). On curriculum construction. Curriculum Theory Network, 5(1), 39–59.
  • Bowers, C. A. (1991a). Some questions about the anachronistic elements in the Giroux-McLaren theory of a critical pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 21(2), 239–252.
  • Bowers, C. A. (1991b). Critical pedagogy and the “arch of social dreaming”: A response to the criticisms of Peter McLaren. Curriculum Inquiry, 21(4), 479–487.
  • Broudy, H. S. (1976). A reply to L. J. Waks. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(2), 130–131.
  • Bullivant, B. (1990a). Ethnographic portrayal of male youth culture in an Australian inner-city school. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(3), 325–339.
  • Bullivant, B. (1990b). Still lost in philosophical fog: A rejoinder to James Walker’s reply to Bullivant’s essay review of Louts and legends. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(3), 351–353.
  • Calfee, R., & Drum, P. (1978). Learning to read: Research and practice. Curriculum Inquiry, 8(3), 183–249.
  • Campbell, E. (2008). The ethics of teaching as a moral profession. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 357–385.
  • Conle, C. (2004). Texts, tensions, subtexts, and implied agendas. Curriculum Inquiry, 34(2), 139–167.
  • Conle, C. (2005). Subversion and alienation, resistance and remedy: The many faces of narrative. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(2), 127–132.
  • Connelly, F. M. (1971). Editorial. Curriculum Theory Network, 7, 1–4.
  • Connelly, F. M. (1978). How shall we publish case studies of curriculum development? Curriculum Inquiry, 8(1), 73–82.
  • Connelly, F. M. (1984). Editorial. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(4), 363–365.
  • Connelly, F. M., He, M. F., & Phillion, J. A. (2008). Handbook of curriculum and instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Corter, C., & Wolanski, A. (2008). A review of “Standardized tests and Froebel’s original kindergarten model. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 483–487.
  • Cumming, A. (2008). Research for and within literacy instruction in secondary schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 401–416.
  • Cummins, J. (2008). An essay review of Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 493–497.
  • Davis, O. L., Jr. (Ed). (1976). Perspectives on curriculum development 1776–1976. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Davis, O. L., Jr. (1977). The nature and boundaries of curriculum history: A contribution to dialogue over a yearbook and its review. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(2), 157–177.
  • Davis, O. L., Jr. (1979). The last mirror: Davis on Davis on Franklin. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(1), 59–61.
  • Dewey, J. (1977). On industrial education. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(1), 53–60.
  • Diamond, C. T. P. (1999). From the tower: A palimpsest of worthwhileness. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 261–272.
  • Donmeyer, R. (1987). Beyond Thorndike/Beyond melodrama. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(4), 353–363.
  • Each, M. (1972). The politics of curriculum evaluation research. Curriculum Theory Network, 8/9, 59–69.
  • Editors. (1969). From the editors. Curriculum Theory Network, 3, 1–2.
  • Egan, K. (1981). Plato’s theory of educational development: On the inappropriateness of applied psychology. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(2), 123–141.
  • Egan, K. (1982). Reply to Betty A. Sichel’s “Plato’s divided line and Piaget: A response to Kieran Egan. Curriculum Inquiry, 12(3), 327–330.
  • Enns, R. (1977). A review of Curriculum: An introduction. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(2), 174–178.
  • Epstein, I. (1999). Street children in film. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 375–388.
  • Farrell, J. (2001). On learning civic virtue: Can schooling really play a role? Curriculum Inquiry, 31(2), 125–135.
  • Fox, S. (1972). A practical image of the “practical. Curriculum Theory Network, 10, 45–57.
  • Franklin, B. (1977). A review of Perspectives on curriculum development 1776–1976. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(1), 67–79.
  • Franklin, B. (1978). Franklin on Davis on Franklin on Davis. Curriculum Inquiry, 8(2), 177–178.
  • Frymier, J., Russell, J., Bills, R., & Finch, C. (1975). Curriculum comments. A study of oppressive practices in school. Curriculum Inquiry, 4(4), 309–313.
  • Gallagher, K. (2008). A book review of Dying to teach: A memoir of love, loss, and learning. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 445–447.
  • Giroux, H. (1979). Paulo Freire’s approach to radical educational reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(3), 257–272.
  • Glatthorn, A. (1984). Cognition and curriculum: A basis for deciding what to teach. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(1), 113–116.
  • Goldstein, T. (2008). Bridging. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(3), 227–231.
  • Greene, M. (1971). Curriculum and consciousness. Teachers College Record, 73(2), 253–269.
  • Greenfield, T. (1985a). Trial by what is contrary. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(1), 1–6.
  • Greenfield, T. (1985b). Trail by what is contrary: II. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(2), 113–119.
  • Greenfield, T. (1988). Writers and the written: Writers and the self. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(3), 245–253.
  • Greenfield, T. (1990). “The ae thing needful”: What is the meaning of this? Curriculum Inquiry, 20(4), 359–367.
  • Gronn, P. (1988a). On the side of the angels. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(3), 355–367.
  • Gronn, P. (1988b). Ritual performance enfeebled. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(3), 321–324.
  • Hames, I. (2007). Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals. Guidelines for good practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • He, M. F., Phillion, J., & Roberge, B. (1999). Narrative understanding of bilingualism: An essay review of Language, culture and power: Bilingual families and the struggle for quality education. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(4), 447–457.
  • Helfenbein, R. (2008). Conjuring curriculum, conjuring control: A reading of resistance in Harry Potter and the order of the phoenix. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 499–513.
  • Herbert, J. (1968). Introduction. Curriculum Theory Network, 1, 1.
  • Holmes, M. (1992). Moral education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(4), 339–344.
  • Jones, G. (2008). The university and society. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 417–432.
  • Kaufman, I., Berk, L., & Herbert, J. (1974). Introduction. Curriculum Theory Network, 4(2/3), 85–87.
  • Kincheloe, J. (1992). Curing the disease and saving the patient: A response to Urban. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(4), 443–446.
  • Kincheloe, J., & Pinar, W. (Eds.). (1991). Curriculum as social psychoanalysis: The significance of place. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Klein, F., & Tyler, L. (1969). On analyzing curricula. Curriculum Inquiry, 3, 10–25.
  • Kliebard, H. (1975). The rise of scientific curriculum making and its aftermath. Curriculum Theory Network, 5(1), 27–38.
  • Kooy, M. (2008). A book review of Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 439–443.
  • Kosnik, C. (2008). An in brief review of Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 437–438.
  • Luke, A. (2010). Documenting reproduction and inequality: Revisiting Jean Anyon’s “Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 167–182.
  • Mann, J. (1969). Curriculum criticism. Curriculum Theory Network, 2, 2–14.
  • McCallister, C. (2008). The “Author’s chair” revisited. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 455–471.
  • McLaren, P. (1988). No light, but rather darkness visible: Language and the politics of criticism. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(3), 313–320.
  • McLaren, P. (1991). The emptiness of nothingness: Criticism as imperial anti-politics. Curriculum Inquiry, 21(4), 459–477.
  • Miller, J. (2010). Curriculum as a consciousness of possibilities. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 125–141.
  • Munby, H. (1979). Philosophy for children: An example of curriculum review and criticism. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(3), 229–249.
  • Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1987). Seeing curriculum in a new light: Reflections on Gordon’s review. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(3), 337–343.
  • Nigh, K. (2008). An in brief review of The wounded researcher: Research with soul in mind. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 435–436.
  • Nystrand, M. (1977). Reply to Wilburn. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(3), 268–269.
  • Paquette, J. (1989). Canadian native languages and second-language learning: Toward understanding. Curriculum Inquiry, 19(1), 97–106.
  • Peterson, S. (2008). A book review of Handbook of writing research. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 449–453.
  • Pinar, W. F. (Ed.). (1975). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  • Rosario, J., & DeMarte, P. (1977). Forward. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(4), 249–250.
  • Rosenshine, B. (1972). Problems in the development of instruments for evaluating curricula. Curriculum Theory Network, 8/9, 221–227.
  • Ross, J. (2008). An in brief review of Multilevel analysis for applied research: It’s just regression! Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 433–434.
  • Schubert, W. (2010). Journeys of expansion and synopsis: Tensions in books that shaped curriculum inquiry, 1968 to present. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 17–94.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(3), 239–265.
  • Sichel, B. (1982). Plato’s divided line and Piaget: A response to Kieran Egan. Curriculum Inquiry, 12(3), 317–326.
  • Simon, R. (1980). Journal editing as a subversive activity: “Curriculum inquiry” and the curriculum field. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(2), 107–113.
  • Simon, R. (1981). Dialogue as a scholarly activity: Editorial. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(3), 201–203. (A slightly revised version was also published in vol. 12, no. 1, 5–8, 1982)
  • Simon, R., & Weiss, J. (1979). Editorial. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(1), 1–2.
  • Smith, B. O. (1976). Comments on Professor Huebner’s paper. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(1), 167–170.
  • Snedden, D. (1977). Fundamental distinctions between liberal and vocational education. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(1), 41–52.
  • Stevens, W., Jr, & Morrissett, I. (1968). A system for analyzing social science curricula. Curriculum Theory Network, 1, 28–36.
  • Sugrue, C. (2010). Plowden: Progressive education—A 4-decade odyssey? Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 105–124.
  • Thiessen, D., Campbell, E., Gaztambide-Fernández, R., & Nigh, K. (2010). 40th anniversary of Curriculum Inquiry—Part I. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 1–16.
  • Thiessen, D., & Nigh, K. (2008). Changes in Curriculum Inquiry: Five issues per year including one annual review issue. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 353–355.
  • Tyler, L. (19701971). Critique of “Curriculum theory and the context of curriculum. Curriculum Theory Network, 6, 66–70.
  • Tyler, L., & Klein, M. F. (1968). Recommendations for curriculum and instructional materials. Curriculum Theory Network, 1, 2–10.
  • Urban, W. (1992a). A curriculum for the South. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(4), 433–441.
  • Urban, W. (1992b). Rejoinder to Joe Kincheloe. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(4), 447–448.
  • Vallance, V. (1977). The landscape of the “The Great Plain Experience. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(2), 87–105.
  • Van Manen, M. (1978). Reconceptualist curriculum thought: A review of recent literature. Curriculum Inquiry, 8(4), 365–375.
  • Villenas, S., & Deyhle, D. (1999). Critical race theory and ethnographies challenging the stereotypes: Latino families, schooling, resilience, and resistance. An essay review of 7 books. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(4), 413–445.
  • Walker, D. (19701971). Critique of “Curriculum theory and the context of curriculum. Curriculum Theory Network, 6, 60–65.
  • Walker, D. (1974). The curriculum field in formation: A review of the Twenty-Sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Curriculum Theory Network, 4(4), 263–280.
  • Walker, D. (1975). Straining to lift ourselves. Curriculum Theory Network, 5(1), 3–26.
  • Walker, J. (1990). Bullivant’s bemusement: A reply to Brian Bullivant’s essay review of Louts and legends. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(3), 339–350.
  • Watson, F. (1971). The BSCS: A curriculum study. Curriculum Theory Network, 7, 135–140.
  • Weiss, J., & Simon, R. (1978). Editorial. Curriculum Inquiry, 8(2), 93–94.
  • Weiss, J., & Simon, R. (1979). Editorial. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(3), 185–186.
  • Werner, W. (1980). Editorial criticism in curriculum analysis. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(2), 143–154.
  • Westbury, I. (1972). The character of a curriculum for a “practical” curriculum. Curriculum Theory Network, 10, 25–36.
  • Wick, W. (1972). Knowledge and action: The theory and practice of “The practical. Curriculum Theory Network, 10, 37–44.
  • Wiley. (1989). Curriculum Inquiry. Curriculum Inquiry, 19(4), inside back cover.
  • Wiley-Blackwell. (2009). Curriculum Inquiry. Retrieved December 7, 2009, from http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ci
  • Willis, G. (1979). Studied naivete: A review of Handbook of curriculum evaluation. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(2), 27–36.
  • Wood, M. (1988). Editorial. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 375–377.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.