Beyond Reading Comprehension and Summary: Learning to Read and Write in History by Focusing on Evidence, Perspective, and Interpretation

References

• Afflerbach, P., & VanSledright, B. (2001). Hath! Doth! What? Middle graders reading innovative history text. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 696–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D., Phelps, S., & Ridgeway, V. (2007). Content area reading and literacy: Succeeding in today’s diverse classrooms. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, R. (2005). They thought the world was flat: Applying the principles of how people learn in teaching high school history. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 179–213). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkin, C. (2002). A brilliant solution: Inventing the American Constitution. New York: Harvest.
   Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next–A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved April 2009, from http://www.all4ed.org/files/ReadingNext.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braten, I., & Stromso, H. (2006). Constructing meaning from multiple information sources as a function of personal epistemology. Information Design Journal, 14(1), 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collingwood, R. G. (1943). The idea of history. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, M. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents: What we know about the promise, what we don't know about the potential. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 84–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1991). History of teaching in social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 197–209). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Denos, M., & Case, R. (2006). Teaching about historical thinking (P. Seixas & P. Clark, Eds.). Vancouver, BC: The Critical Thinking Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R. (1997). In defense of history. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Felton, M., & Herko, S. (2004). From dialogue to two-sided argument: Scaffolding adolescents' persuasive writing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(8), 672–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1995). A dubious battle in Oakland. In The twilight of common dreams: Why America is wracked by culture wars (pp. 7–36). New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools–A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved April 2009, from http://www.all4ed.org/files/WritingNext.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greene, S. (2001). The question of authenticity: Teaching writing in a first-year college history of science class. Research in the Teaching of English, 35(5), 525–569.
   Google Scholar
• Hexter, J. H. (1971). The history primer. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, T. (1990). Thinking historically: Narrative, imagination, and understanding. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
   Google Scholar
• Hynd-Shanahan, C., Holschuh, J. P., & Hubbard, B. P. (2004). Thinking like a historian: College students' reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(2), 141–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, J. (1986). Learning through writing: Study skills in the content areas. Journal of Reading, 29(5), 400–406.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 31–78). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7–14. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history (pp. 199–222). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. & Shemilt, D. (2003). A scaffold not a cage: Progression and progression models in history. Teaching History, 113, 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Levstik, L., & Barton, K. (2008). Researching history education: Theory, method, and context. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Linenthal, E., & Engelhardt, T. (Eds.). (1996). History wars: The Enola Gay and other battles for the American past. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, J., Kirby, S., Barney, H., Darilek, H., & Magee, S. (2005). Achieving state and national literacy goals: A long uphill battle. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, J. (2003). Crossroads of freedom: Antietam, the battle that changed the course of the Civil War. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mink, L. (1987). Historical understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E., Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and Discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C. (2008). Qualities of effective writing instruction in history classrooms: A cross-case comparison of two teachers' practices. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1045–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C. (2010). Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature of adolescents' writing. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4), 539–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D., Bean, T., Birdyshaw, D., & Rycik, J. (1999). Adolescent literacy: A position statement for the Commission on Adolescent Literacy of the International Reading Association. Retrieved July 2007, from http://www.reading.org/downloads/positions/ps1036_adolescent.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D., Readence, J., & Rickelman, R. (1983). An historical exploration of content area reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(4), 419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2002). The nation’s report card: U.S. History. Retrieved October 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2001/2002483.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2003). The nation’s report card: Writing 2002. Retrieved July 20007, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2002/2003529.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2007). The nation’s report card: 12^th grade Reading and Mathematics. Retrieved July 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007468
   Google Scholar
• Page, R. N. (1991). Lower track classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, R. (2002). The influence of author visibility on high school students solving a historical problem. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 197–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, C., & Seixas, P. (2008). Benchmarks of historical thinking: First steps. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(4), 1015–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D., & Finn, C. (1987). What do our 17-year-olds know? New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, R. (2000). How Americans use and think about the past. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history (pp. 262–283). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J., Britt, M., Mason, R., & Perfetti, C. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 478–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenbach, R., Greenleaf, C., Cziko, C., & Hurwitz, L. (1999). Reading for understanding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (1993). Popular film and young people’s understanding of the history of Native American-White relations. The History Teacher, 26(3), 351–370.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (1994). Students' understanding of historical significance. Theory and Research in Social Education, 22(3), 281–304.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (1999). Beyond “content” and “pedagogy”: In search of a way to talk about history education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 317–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2006). Benchmarks of historical thinking: A framework for assessment in Canada. The Center for the Study of Historical Consciousness. Retrieved September 20, 2009, from http://www.histori.ca/benchmarks/documents/Benchmarks%20of%20Historical%20Thinking%20A%20Framework%20for%20Assessment%20in%20Canada.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (1980). History 13–16 evaluation study. Leeds, UK: Schools Council Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (1983). The devil’s locomotive. History and Theory, 22, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S., Hynd, C., Britton, B., McNish, M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B. (2002). Confronting history’s interpretive paradox while teaching fifth graders to investigate the past. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 1089–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Voss, J. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (Ed.). (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M., & Goldman, S. (2005). Relations between adolescents' text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K. M., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Writing from primary documents: A way of knowing in history. Written Communication, 15(1), 25–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar