Which Ranking? The Impact of a 'Value-Added' Measure of Secondary School Performance

References

• Atkinson, A., and Wilson, D., 2003. Measuring pupil attainment in English secondary schools: A preliminary analysis. CMPO Working Paper. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, S., Crouchley, R., Millington, J., and Taylor, J., 2000. Testing for quasi-market forces in secondary education, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 62 (3) (2000), pp. 357–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, S., Propper, C., and Wilson, D., 2002. Does perfori—nce monitoring work? A review of the evidence from the UK public sector, excluding health care. CMPO Working Paper. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. B., and Reback, R., 2002. Tinkering towards accolades: School gaming under a performance accountability system. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A., 2002. Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretive review, Journal of Human Resources 37 (4) (2002), pp. 696–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N., and Getzler, L. S., 2002. Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system. NBER Working Paper 9307. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., 1996. Monitoring Education: Indicators, Quality and Effectiveness. London: Cassell; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., 1997. The Value-added National Project: Final Report: Feasibility Studies for a National System of Value-added Indicators. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., 2000. "Quality, science and Soros's reflexivity concept: A value-added approach". In: Quality and Educational Management: A European Issue. Budapest: Muszaki; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., and Tymms, P., 2002. Technical and ethical issues in indicator systems: Doing things right and doing wrong things, Education Policy Analysis Archives 10 (2002), p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Gerwitz, S., Ball, S. J., and Bowe, R., 1995. Markets, Choice and Equity. Milton Keynes: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D., 1996. Exclusions from school, Educational Studies 26 (4) (1996), pp. 423–436.
   Google Scholar
• Glennerster, H., 1991. Quasi-markets for education, Economic Journal 101 (1991), pp. 1268–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., 2001. Using pupil performance data for judging schools and teachers: Scope and limitations, British Educational Research Journal 27 (4) (2001), pp. 433–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., and Spiegelhalter, D. J., 1996. League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 159 (3) (1996), pp. 385–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F., 1999. The Dallas school accountability and incentive program: An evaluation of its impacts on student outcomes, Economics of Education Review 18 (1) (1999), pp. 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grand, J., 1991. Quasi-markets and social policy, Economic Journal 101 (1991), pp. 1256–1267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. H., 1997. Value-added indicators of school performance: A primer, Economics of Education Review 16 (3) (1997), pp. 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, L., 1999. Abrief history of educational 'value-added': How did we get to where we are?, School Effectiveness and School Improvement 10 (2) (1999), pp. 233–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., 1998. Value-added measures of school effectiveness in the United Kingdom, Prospects 28 (1) (1998), pp. 91–108.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., 2001. Dimensions of secondary school effectiveness: Comparative analyses across regions, School Effectiveness and School Improvement 12 (2001), pp. 285–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., and Mortimore, P., 1996. Comparison of value-added models for secondary school effectiveness, Research Papers in Education 11 (1) (1996), pp. 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• , (2002) League table bonus attracts schools to vocational option.
   Google Scholar
• Tymms, P., and Fitz-Gibbon, C., 2001. "Standards, achievements and educational performance: A cause for celebration?". In: Phillips, R., and Furlong, J., eds. Education, Reform and the State: Twenty-five Years of Politics, Policy and Practice. London: Routledge; 2001. pp. 156–173.
   Google Scholar
• West, A., and Pennell, H., 2000. Publishing school examination results in England: Incentives and consequences, Educational Studies 26 (4) (2000), pp. 423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, G., Power, S., and Halpin, D., 1998. Devolution and Choice in Education: The School, the State and the Market. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, A., and Tymms, P., 2002. Dysfunctional effects of league tables: A comparison between English and Scottish primary schools, Public Money & Management 22 (1) (2002), pp. 43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., 2001. Information, incentives and insurer behaviour: An analysis of selection in the health insurance market. University of Bristol; 2001, unpublished PhD thesis.
   Google Scholar