The Policy and Premises of Urban Development Action Grant Program Implementation: A Comparative Analysis of the Carter and Reagan Presidencies

REFERENCES

• Derthick, M. (1972). New towns in-town. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dommel, P., Back, V., Liebshutz, S., Rubinowitz, L., & Associates. (1980). Targeting community development. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M. (1975). A nation of cities. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glickman, N. (1984). Economic policy and the cities: In search of Reagan’s real urban policy. Journal of American Planning Association, 50, 471–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. (1983). Rethinking urban policy: Urban development in an advanced economy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Housing and Development Reporter. (1982). No. 36, pp. 686–687.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, H. (1963). Urban renewal politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M., Cuciti, P., James, F., Clark, P., Willie, C., Casserli, M., & Matz, D. (1984). Urban America 1984: A report card. Washington, DC: The National Urban Advisory Committee to the Subcommittee on Investment, Jobs and Prices of the Joint Economic Committee of the Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, C. (1976, June 29). Carter qualifies pledge to cities. New York Times, 1, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, R., & Webman, J. (Eds.). (1980). The Urban Development Action Grant program: Papers and conference proceedings on its first two years of operation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Urban and Regional Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, M. (1982). Hitting the target: The distributional impacts of the Urban Development Action Grant program. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17, 285–301.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, J. (1967). Economic evaluation of urban renewal. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, R. (1985a). Supporters pledge to protect popular urban aid program. Congressional Quarterly, 43, 113–115.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, R. (1985b). Senators agree to restore urban grants to budget plan. Congressional Quarterly, 43, 945.
   Google Scholar
• Savas, E. (1983). A positive urban policy for the future. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, 447–453.
   Google Scholar
• Stanfield, R. (1977). Civil war over cities’ aid—The battle no one expected. National Journal, 9, 1226–227.
   Google Scholar
• Stanfield, R. (1979). Pockets of poverty—The other side of Houston. National Journal, 12, 476–479.
   Google Scholar
• Stanfield, R. (1981). Economic development aid-shell game or the key to urban rejuvenation National Journal, 13, 494–497.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, M. (1985). Decision chains and federal budget decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman, D. (1986). The triumph of politics: Why the Reagan revolution failed. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Sundquist, J. (1969). Making federalism work. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Tower, J. (1977). Prepared remarks: UDAG and the poor. Congressional Record, 7:17824.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress, House. (April, 1977). Authorization hearings for the Department of Housing and Urban Development before the Subcommittee on Community Development. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress, House. (1978). Joint explanatory statement of the Committee of Conference to amend and extend certain federal laws relating to housing and community development. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress, Senate. (1977). Authorization hearings for the Department of Housing and Urban Development before the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USDHUD). (1978). The president’s national urban policy report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USDHUD). (1982a). The president’s national urban policy report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USDHUD). (1982b). An impact evaluation of the urban development action grant program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USDHUD). (1984). The president’s national urban policy report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). (1984). Insights into major Urban Development Action Grant issues. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). (1985). The Urban Development Action Grant application selection system: Basic criticisms and alternatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of the President. (1985). Budget of the United States for fiscal 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of the President. (1986). Budget of the United States for fiscal 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Land. (1985). No. 44, pp. 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Webman, J. (1981). UDAG: Targeting urban economic development. Political Science Quarterly, 96, 189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar