Place-Based and Race-Based Exclusion from Mortgage Loans: Evidence from Three Cities in the Netherlands

REFERENCES

• Aalbers, M. B. (2002). The neglected evidence of housing market discrimination in the Netherlands. Radical Statistics, 79/80, 161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. (2003). Redlining in Nederland: Oorzaken en gevolgen van uitsluiting op de hypotheekmarkt. Amsterdam: Aksant/Spinhuis.
   Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2005a). Who’s afraid of red, yellow and green?: Redlining in Rotterdam. Geoforum, 36(5), 562–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2005b). Place-based social exclusion: Redlining in the Netherlands. Area, 37(1), 100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2005c). ‘The quantified customer’, or how financial institutions value risk. InP. Boelhouwer, J. Doling, & M. Elsinga (Eds.), Home ownership: Getting in, getting from, getting out (pp. 33–57). Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2006a). ‘When the banks withdraw, slum landlords take over’: The structuration of neighbourhood decline through redlining, drug dealing, speculation and immigrant exploitation. Urban Studies, 43(7), 1061–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2006b). Direct en indirect onderscheid op de hypotheekmarkt in Arnhem, Den Haag en Rotterdam. Onderzoek in opdracht van de Commissie Gelijke Behandeling naar discriminatie bij risicoselectie door hypotheeknemers. Amsterdam: AMIDSt, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2006c). Risicoafhankelijke hypotheekrente. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 91(4485), 211.
   Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2007a). What types of neighbourhoods are redlined? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22(2), forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2007b). Geographies of housing finance: The mortgage market in Milan, Italy. Growth and Change, 38(2), forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlbrandt, R. S. (1977). Exploratory research on the redlining phenomenon. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 5, 473–481.
   Google Scholar
• Batt, C. D., & Fowkes, T. R. (1972). The development and use of credit scoring schemes. InS. Eilon & T. R. Fowkes (Eds.), Applications of management science in banking and finance (pp. 181–204). London: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Bovenkerk, F., Gras, M. J. I., & Ramsoedh, D. (1995). Discrimination against migrant workers and ethnic minorities in access to employment in the Netherlands. Genève: International Labour Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, K. L., Case, K. E., & Dunham, C. R. (1989). Geographic patterns of mortgage lending in Boston, 1982–1987. New England Economic Review, 4(Sep/Oct), 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, C. P., & Rubinowitz, L. S. (1975). The urban-suburban investment-disinvestment process: Consequences for older neighborhoods. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 422, 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, C., & Shlay, A. B. (1996). Assuming a can opener: Economic theory’s failure to explain discrimination in FHA lending markets. Cityscape, 2(1), 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de S. (2003). Re-shaping the geography of opportunity: Place effects in global perspective. Housing Studies, 18(6), 915–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de S. (Ed.) (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, B. G. (2005). The sociology of money and credit. InN. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology.Second edition (pp. 355–378). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Coenders, M., Lindner, L., Silversmith, J., & Visser, J. (2003). Kerncijfers 2003: Jaaroverzicht discriminatieklachten bij Antidiscriminatiebureaus en meldpunten. Amsterdam: Landelijke Vereniging Anti-Discriminatie Bureaus.
   Google Scholar
• Dagevos, J. (2001). Perspectief op integratie. Over de sociaal-culturele en structurele integratie van etnische minderheden in Nederland. Den Haag: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.
   Google Scholar
• Dagevos, J., Gijsberts, M., & Van Praag, C. (2003). Rapportage minderheden 2003: onderwijs arbeid en sociaal-culturele integratie. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Dahrendorf, R. (1993). Social structure, group interests, and conflict groups. InJ. Farganis (Ed.), Readings in social theory: The classic tradition to post-modernism (pp. 224–243). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dedman, B. (1988). The color of money. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, May 1–4. Available at http://www.powerreporting.com/color/.
   Google Scholar
• Detlefsen, R. (1997). HUDlining: Disparate impact and insurance. Center for Equal Opportunity, Policy Brief. November.
   Google Scholar
• Dolfing, M., & Van Tubergen, F. (2005). Bensaïdi of Veenstra? Een experimenteel onderzoek naar discriminatie van Marokkanen in Nederland. Sociologie, 1, 407–422.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W., & Veldboer, L. (2000). Gelijkheid en verschil in het wonen. InM. C. Meindertsma (Ed.), Stadslab: Over stedelijke vernieuwing en herstructurering (pp. 59–75). Rotterdam: KEI.
   Google Scholar
• Dymski, G. A., & Veitch, J. M. (1994). Taking it to the bank: Race, credit and income in Los Angeles. InR. D. Bullard, J. E. Grigsby, & C. Lee (Eds.), Residential apartheid: The American legacy (pp. 150–179). Los Angeles: UCLA Center for African American Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Engelen, E. (2001). Breaking in and out. A Weberian approach to entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27, 203–223.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichs, J. (1998). Do poor neighbourhoods make their residents poorer? Context effects of poverty neighbourhoods on their residents. InH.-J. Andress (Ed.), Empirical poverty research in a comparative perspective (pp. 77–99). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C. (1992). Research on discrimination in housing and mortgage markets: Assessment and future directions. Washington, DC: Proceedings, Fannie Mae Annual Housing Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Gratz, R. B. (1989). The living city. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Haagsche Courant (2003). Bezorgde raad door wijkboycot. July 18.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1977). Government policies, financial institutions and neighbourhood change in United States cities. InM. Harloe (Ed.), Captive cities: Studies in the political economy of cities and regions (pp. 123–139). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, J. (1961). Catch-22. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, S. R. (1998). Exploring the neighborhood contingency of race discrimination in mortgage lending in Columbus, Ohio. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(2), 252–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghiemstra, E. (1991). Gelijke kansen voor allochtonen op een baan? Migrantenstudies, 1, 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Housing Policy Debate (1995). Special issue: Access to opportunity: Understanding its influence on urban lives. 6(1), 1–297.
   Google Scholar
• Housing Studies (1997). Special issue: Opportunity, deprivation and the housing nexus: Trans-Atlantic perspectives. 17(1), 1–150.
   Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2004). Credit to the community: Community reinvestment and fair lending policy in the United States. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. T. (1985). Crabgrass frontier. The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasinitz, P. (2000). Red Hook: The paradoxes of poverty and place in Brooklyn. Research in Urban Sociology, 5, 253–274.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. L. (1998). Chicago: Segregation and the new urban poverty. InS. Musterd & W. Ostendorf (Eds.), Urban segregation and the welfare state (pp. 45–63). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klaver, J., Mevissen, J. W. M., & Odé, A. W. M. (2005). Etnische minderheden op de arbeidsmarkt: Beelden en feiten, belemmeringen en oplossingen. Amsterdam: Regioplan.
   Google Scholar
• Leyshon, A., & Thrift, N. (1999). Lists come alive: Electronic systems of knowledge and the rise of credit-scoring in retail banking. Economy and Society, 28(3), 434–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mollenkopf, J. H. (1983). The contested city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Motivaction (2004). Trendmeter van het middenbedrijf. Amsterdam: Motivaction.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, A., & Yagmur, M. (2003). ‘Redlining’ in Den Haag. Haagsche Courant, July 17.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (Eds.) (1998). Urban segregation and the welfare state: Inequality and exclusion in western cities. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., Ostendorf, W., & De Vos, S. (2003). Neighbourhood effects and social mobility: A longitudinal analysis. Housing Studies, 18(6), 877–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nee, V. (2005). The new institutionalism in economics and sociology. InN. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.). The handbook of economic sociology. Second edition (pp. 49–74). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NIBE (1995). Aanvraag, beoordeling en beheer. InConsumentenkrediet module 4. Amsterdam: Nederlands Instituut voor het Bank- en Effectenbedrijf (NIBE).
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R. E. (1970). Whose City? And other essays on sociology and planning. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R. E. (1977). Managers, technical experts and the state: Forms of mediation, manipulation and dominance in urban and regional development. InM. Harloe (Ed.), Captive cities. Studies in the political economy of cities and regions (pp. 49–60). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, P. R. (1997). Anders niets? Discriminatie naar ras en nationaliteit bij consumententransacties. Lelystad, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Vermande.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Room, G. J. (1999). Social exclusion, solidarity and the challenge of globalisation. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8, 166–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. L., & Tootell, G. M. B. (2004). Redlining, the Community Reinvestment Act, and private mortgage insurance. Journal of Urban Economics, 55, 278–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. L., & Yinger, J. (2002). The color of credit: Mortgage discrimination, research methodology, and fair-lending enforcement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, D. (1999). Inside game/outside game: Winning strategies for saving urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheepers, P., Coenders, M., & Lubbers, M. (2003). Historisch overzicht van etnocentrische reacties in Nederland aan het eind van de twintigste eeuw. Beleid en Maatschappij, 30, 80–89.
   Google Scholar
• SCP, WODC, & CBS (2005). Jaarrapport integratie 2005. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum/Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
   Google Scholar
• Shlay, A. (1989). Financing community: Methods for assessing residential credit disparities, market barriers, and institutional reinvestment performance in the metropolis. Journal of Urban Affairs, 11(3), 201–223.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, J., & Langbroek, P. (1994). Gelijke behandeling van allochtone en autochtone jongeren op de kamermarkt: Een onderzoek naar een juridisch verantwoord en effectief instrumentarium voor gemeenten. Utrecht: Afdeling Staats- en Bestuursrecht, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, G. D. (1992). From redlining to reinvestment: Community response to urban disinvestment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, G. D., & Kubrin, C. E. (2005). Privileged places: Race, uneven development and the geography of opportunity in urban America. Urban Studies, 42(1), 47–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 73, 393–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, G. (2003). Discriminating risk: The U.S. mortgage lending industry in the twentieth century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesser, P. T. M., Van Dugteren, F. A., & Merens, A. (1996). Rapportage minderheden 1996: Bevolking, arbeid, onderwijs, huisvesting. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Tomer, L. (1980). The mounting evidence on mortgage redlining. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 15, 488–501.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., & Skidmore, F. (Eds.) (1999). Mortgage lending discrimination: A review of existing evidence. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hoorn, F. J. J. H., & Van Ginkel, J. A. (1986). Racial leapfrogging in a controlled housing market: The case of the Mediterranean minority in Utrecht. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 77, 187–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tubergen, F., Maas, I., & Flap, H. (2004). The economic incorporation of immigrants in 18 western societies: Origin, destination, and community effects. American Sociological Review, 69, 701–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verberk, G., Scheepers, P., & Felling, A. (2002). Attitudes and behavioural intentions towards ethnic minorities: An empirical test of several theoretical explanations for the Dutch case. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28, 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (1996). Red belt, Black belt: Racial division, class inequality and the state in the French urban periphery and the American ghetto. InE. Mingione (Ed.), Urban poverty and the underclass: A reader (pp. 234–274). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. (1981). A theory of suburbanization: Capitalism and the construction of urban space in the United States. InM. Dear & A. J. Scott (Eds.), Urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society (pp. 383–429). New York: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1946). Class, status, party. InH. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 180–195). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Wyly, E. K., & Holloway, S. R. (1999). “The color of money” revisited: Racial lending patterns in Atlanta’s neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 555–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. (1991). Landscapes of power: From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar