Rational Choice and Regional Governance

REFERENCES

• Alcorn, J., & Toledo, V. (1998). Resilient resource management in Mexico’s forest ecosystems: The contribution of property right. InF. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A. (2005). Interlocal contractual arrangements in the provision of public safety. Paper presented at Creating Collaborative Communities: Management Networks, Services Cooperation, and Metropolitan Governance, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, October 31, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, S. S. (2006). Public economics, institutions, and debt financing by local governments, Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Basolo, V. (2003). U.S. regionalism and rationality. Urban Studies, 40, 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardo, R., & Scholz, J. T. (2005). Micro-incentives and the dynamics of policy networks. Prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, September 1–4, 2005, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C. (2002). Piling on: The fiscal effects of jurisdictional overlap. Paper presented at N.Y.U. Politics Department Seminar Series, November 14. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bickers, K. N. (2005). The politics of interlocal cooperation: A theory and a test. Paper presented at Creating Collaborative Communities: Management Networks, Services Cooperation, and Metropolitan Governance, Wayne State University, Detroit MI, October 31, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bish, R. L. (2000). Evolutionary alternatives for metropolitan areas: The capital region of British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 23, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Brierly, A. B. (2004). Issues of scale and transaction costs in city-county consolidation. InJ. B. Carr & R. C. Feiock (Eds.), Reshaping the local landscape: Perspectives on city-county consolidation and its alternatives. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carley, K. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56, 331–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B., & Feiock, R. C. (Eds.) (2004). Reshaping the local landscape: Perspectives on city-county consolidation and its alternatives. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B., & LeRoux, K. (2005). Which local governments cooperate on public safety? Lessons from Michigan. Paper presented at Creating Collaborative Communities: Management Networks, Services Cooperation, and Metropolitan Governance, Wayne State University, Detroit MI, October 31, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Clingermayer, J. C., & Feiock, R. C. (2001). Institutional constraints and policy choice: An exploration of local governance. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. (1988). The firm, the market and the law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, K. (2004). Partner selection and network resources. Available at http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/andrew.king/Papers/Cowell.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin, N. (1996). The devils in the detail: Some reflections on contracting for social care. Social Policy and Administration, 30(1), 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. K. (1996). The making of economic policy: A transaction-cost politics perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A., & Olson, M. (2000). Does voluntary participation undermine the Coase Theorem? Journal of Public Economics, 76, 309–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1994). New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Ellickson, R. (1979). Public property rights: Vicarious intergovernmental rights and liabilities as a technique for correcting intergovernmental spillovers. InD. Rubinfeld (Ed.), Essays on the law and economics of local governments. COUPE Papers on Public Economics. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2002). A quasi-market framework for local economic development competition. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2004). Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition and cooperation. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2005). Institutional collective action and local governance. Paper presented at Creating Collaborative Communities: Management Networks, Services Cooperation, and Metropolitan Governance, Wayne State University, Detroit MI, October 31, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Jeong, M., & Kim, J. (2003). Credible commitment and council–manager government: Implications for policy instrument choices. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 616–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Park, H. J., & Steinacker, A. (2005). Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures. Paper presented at the Public Management Research Association biannual meeting, Los Angeles, October 2, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, J., & Graddy, E. (1986). Contracting out: For what? with whom? Public Administration Review, 46, 332–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, K. A. (1997). The political economy of special-purpose government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G., Johnson, G. A., & Wood, C. H. (2004). The adapted city: Institutional dynamics and structural change. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, J. A. (1994). International investment and colonial control: A new interpretation. International Organization, 48(4), 559–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E., & Gibson, C. C. (2005). Balancing competing interests in American regional government. Paper presented for the Program in American Democracy Speaker Series, Notre Dame University, February 1, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gillette, C. P. (2000). Regionalization and interlocal bargains. NYU Law Review, 76, 190–271.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439–1493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. S. (2001). Who will govern American metropolitan regions? InD. Phares (Ed.), Metropolitan governance without metropolitan government? Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• ICMA (1997). Municipal form of government, 1996: Trends in structure, responsibility, and composition. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Inman, R. P., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1997). Rethinking federalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, R. P., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2000). Federalism. InB. Bouckaert & G. De Geest (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics, volume I. The history and methodology of law and economics. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, B. (Ed.) (2000). Reflections on regionalism. Washington: Brookings Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R., & Martin, L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security, 20(1), 29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, S. (2006). Counting competitors: Relative gains and cooperation in metropolitan areas. Paper presented for the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, IL, April 27, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, S., & McGuire, M. (2005). A transaction costs explanation of interlocal government collaboration. Paper presented for the Eighth National Public Management Research Conference, Los Angeles, September 29–October 1, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Libecap, G. (1989). Contracting for property rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. (2000). A transaction costs model of metropolitan governance: Allocation vs. redistribution in urban America. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 49–78.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. (2001). Metropolitan governance structures from a neoprogressive perspective. Swiss Political Science Review, 7(3), 130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D., Lyons, W. E., & DeHoog, R. H. (1995). The empirical evidence for citizen information and a local market for public goods. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 705–707.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Schneider, M., Scholz, J. T., & Mete, M. (2002). Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 148–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, B., Feiock, R. C., Clingermayer, J., & Stream, C. (2007). Turnover among city managers: The role of political and economic change. Public Administration Review, 66, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J. (1992). Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J. (2000). Above politics: Credible commitment and efficiency in the design of public agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 298–328.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D., & Hirlinger, M. (1991). Intergovernmental service contracts: A multivariate explanation. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27(1), 128–144.
   Google Scholar
• Neiman, M. (1976). Social stratification and governmental inequality. American Political Science Review, 70(March), 149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. J., & Feiock, R. C. (2003). Social capital and the tradeoff between environment and development. International Journal of Economic Development, 4(3). http://www.spaef.com/IJED_PUB/.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. J., & Feiock, R. C. (2006). Social capital and regional partnerships: Overcoming the transaction costs of institutional collective action, working paper, Devoe Moore Center Program in Local Governance. http://www.fsu.edu/˜localgov.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, R., & Oakerson, R. (1993). Comparative metropolitan organization: Service production and governance structures in St. Louis, MO, and Allegheny County, PA. Publius, 23, 19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, S. (2002). Local government cooperation: The relationship between metropolitan area government geography and service provision. Paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29–September 1, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, W., and Sened, I. (1991). A political theory of the origin of property rights: Airport slots. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 951–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, A. (1995). Bargaining experiments. InRoth, A., & Kagel, J. K. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Fostering the development of policy theory. InP. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. (1992). Collective action. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V., & Vogel, R. (2000). Metropolitan consolidation versus metropolitan governance in Louisville. State and Local Government Review, 32(3), 198–212.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, J. T., Berardo, R., & Kile, B. (2005). Do networks enhance cooperation? Policy communities, issue networks, and joint environmental projects. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, J. T., Feiock, R. C., & Ahn, T. K. (2005). Policy networks and institutional collective action in a Federalist system. Paper presented at the Florida Political Science Association annual meeting, Tallahassee, FL, March 12, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M., & Feiock, R. C. (2005). Inter-local fiscal cooperation in the provision of local public services—The case of Georgia cities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Administration, Milwaukee, WI, April 2–5, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M., & Feiock, R. C. (2006). The network structure of interlocal cooperation for water related services. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, IL, April 27, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, R. M. (1990). Urban alternatives: Public and private markets in the provision of local services. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, R. M., & Post, S. (2000). State economies, metropolitan governance, and urban-suburban economic dependence. Urban Affairs Review, 36(1), 46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinacker, A. (2004). Game theoretic models of metropolitan cooperation. InR. C. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, competition and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, A. (2000). Regionalization efforts between big cities and their suburbs: Rhetoric and reality. InA. A. Summers, R. Greenstein, & W. Wiewel (Eds.), Urban-suburban interdependencies. Cambridge, UK: Lincoln Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Teske, P., Schneider, M., Mintrom, M., & Best, S. (1995). The empirical evidence for citizen information and a local market for public goods: Response. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 707–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmaier, K., & Wood, C. (2002). Interlocal agreements as social networks: Picket fence regionalism in metropolitan Kansas City. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 585–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanberg, V. (2002). Rational choice versus program-based behavior: Alternative theoretical approaches and their relevance for the study of institutions. Rationality and Society, 13(1), 7–54.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2002). The uneven distribution of market solutions for public goods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(4), 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar