Local Growth Control at the Ballot Box: Real Effects or Symbolic Politics?

REFERENCES

• Branfman, E. J., Cohen, B. I., & Turbek, D. M. (1973). Measuring the invisible wall: Land use controls and the residential patterns of the poor. Yale Law Journal, 82(3), 483–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Association of Realtors (1992). California ballot monitor: A guide to local land use and taxation measures (CAR Report). Los Angeles: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R. W. (1992). Land use planning: The ballot box revolution. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, M. (1976). The politics of exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeGrove, J. M. (1995). Growth management principles and practices. Chicago: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Housing and Community Development (2000). Raising the roof: California housing development projections and constraints 1997–2020. Sacramento, CA: Department of Housing and Community Development.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (2002). Have housing prices risen faster in Portland than elsewhere? Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), 7–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Champaign, IL: The University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feitelson, E. (1993). The spatial effects of land use regulations: A missing link in growth control evaluations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (1990). Do growth controls matter? A review of empirical evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of local government land use regulations. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, W. (1999). Guide to California planning. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, W., Nguyen, M., Williamson, C., Shigley, P., Kancler, E., Dietenhofer, J. (2002). Growth management ballot measures in California. Ventura, CA: Solimar Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ihlandfeldt, K. R. (2004). Exclusionary land-use regulations within suburban communities: A review of the evidence and policy prescriptions. Urban Studies, 41(2), 261–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. D. (1992). Do growth controls work? A new assessment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(4), 489–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, N. (1999). The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California. Urban Studies, 36(12), 2047–2068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillydahl, J. H., & Singell, L. D. (1987). The effects of growth management on the housing market: A review of the theoretical and empirical evidence. Journal of Urban Affairs, 9(1), 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Zhou, M. (1989). Do suburban growth controls control growth? American Sociological Review, 54(June), 461–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger, M. I., & Temkin, K. (2000). Red tape and housing costs: How regulation affects new residential development. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Malpezzi, S. (1996). Housing prices, externalities, and regulations in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Housing Research, 7(2), 209–241.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, C. J., & Somerville, C. T. (2000). Land use regulation and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30, 639–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, P., & Carson, R. (1991). Growth controls: Policy analysis for the second generation. Policy Sciences, 24(2), 127–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. 2002. Comment on Anthony Downs’s “Have housing prices risen faster in Portland than elsewhere?” Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), 33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M., & Fulton, W. (2002). Tools and patterns of growth management ballot measures in California. Ventura, CA: Solimar Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(2), 125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J., & Goodstein, E. (2000). Growth management and housing prices: The case of Portland, Oregon. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(3), 334–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollakowski, H. O., & Wachter, S. M. (1990). The effects of land-use constraints on housing prices. Land Economics, 66(3), 315–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, D. E., Black, T. J., & Stasiowski, K. M. (1977). Effects of regulation on housing costs: Two case studies. Washington, DC: The Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Schill, M. H., & Wachter, S. M. (1995). Housing market constraints and spatial stratification by income and race. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 141–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. B. (2003). Political participation in cities. InP. Pelissero (Ed.), Cities, Politics, and Policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Q. (1996). Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: The San Francisco Bay Region in the 1980s. Environment and Behavior B: Planning and Design, 23, 61–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlay, A. B., & Rossi, P. H. (1981). Keeping up the neighborhood: Estimating net effects of zoning. American Sociological Review, 46(December), 703–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staley, S. R. (2001). Ballot-box zoning, transaction costs, and urban growth. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 25–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census (1980). 1980 Census of population and housing summary tape file 3A. Washington, D.C.: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census (1990). 1990 Census of population and housing summary tape file 3A. Washington, D.C.: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census (2000). 2000 Census of population and housing summary tape file 3A. Washington, D.C.: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, K., & Molotch, H. (1995). Power to build: How development persists despite local controls. Urban Affairs Review, 30, 378–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar