The Impacts of State Growth Management Programs on Urban Sprawl in the 1990S

REFERENCES

• Anthony, J. (2004). Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl? Urban Affairs Review, 39(3), 376–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollens, S. A. (1992). State growth management: Intergovernmental frameworks and policy objectives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(4), 454–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burby, R. J., May, P. J., Berke, P. R., Dalton, L. C., French, S. P., & Kaiser, E. J. (1997). Making governments plan: State experiments in managing land use. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, R., Shad, N. A., Listokin, D., Phillips, H., Downs, A., Seskin, S., et al. (1998). The cost of sprawl revisited. Transportation Research Board. Report No. 39, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, J. I. (2002). The impacts of state growth management programs: A comparative analysis. Urban Studies, 39(11), 1959–1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2002). Fragmentation and sprawl: Evidence from interregional analysis. Growth and Change, 33, 312–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutsinger, J., Galster, G., Wolman, H., Hanson, R., & Towns, D. (2005). Verifying the multi-dimensional nature of metropolitan land use: Advancing the understanding and measurement of sprawl. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(3), 235–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C., & Nelson, A. C. (2003). State growth management programs and central-city revitalization. Journal of American Planning Association, 69(4), 381–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGrove, J. M. (1984). Land, growth, and politics. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeGrove, J. M., & Metzger, P. M. (1993). Growth management and the integrated roles of state, regional, and local governments. InJ. M. Stein (Ed.), Growth management: The planning challenge of the 1990s (pp. 3–17). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Deyle, R. E., & Smith, R. A. (1998). Local government compliance with state planning mandates the ejects of state implementation in Florida. Journal of American Planning Association, 64(4), 457–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, H. L., & Noonan, P. F. (1996). The agenda. InH. L. Diamond & P. F. Noonan (Eds.), Land use in America (pp. xvii–xx). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1999). Some realities about sprawl and decline. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 955–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J., & Swanstrom, T. (2001). Place matters. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, R. F., Thomas, L. W., & Haynes, D. (1993). The politics of growth management reform in the states: A comparative analysis. Policy Studies Review, 12(3), 30–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R. (1994). Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: A literature review. Environmental and Urban Issues, 21(2), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R. (1997). Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 107–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., Pendall, R., & Chen, D. (2002). Measuring sprawl and its impact. Washington, DC: Smart Growth America.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M., & Harrison, A. (2001). Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, D. E. (1992). Eight state-sponsored growth management programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(4), 425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M. R., Wolman, H., Colemand, S., & Freihage, J. (2001). Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), 681–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillham, O. (2002). The limitless city. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., & Kahn, M. (2001). Decentralized employment and the transformation of the American city. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Kahn, M., & Chu, C. (2001). Job sprawl: Employment locations in U.S. metopolitan areas. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, R. G., & Rosenberg, J. S. (1979). Land use and the states. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holcombe, R. G. (1990). Growth management in Florida: Lessons for the national economy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 10(1), 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S., Ross, J., & Usowski, K. (1998). U.S. suburbanization in the 1980s. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28, 611–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, M. J. (2003). The effects of Portland’s urban growth boundary on urban development patterns and commuting. Urban Studies, 41(7), 1333–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, E. D. (2004). Managing community growth (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kolakowski, K. (1991). Oregon: Fifteen years of land-use planning. InJ. M. DeGrove (Ed.), Balanced growth: A planning guide for local government (pp. 125–129). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. D., Deng, L., & Reilly, M. (2002). Growth management revisited: A reassessment of its efficacy, price effects and impacts on metropolitan growth patterns. Working paper, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. G. (1996). Shaping suburbia: How political institutions organize urban development. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, R., & Hynes, H. P. (2003). Sprawl in the 1990s, measurement, distribution, and trends. Urban Affairs Review, 38(3), 325–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masotti, L. H., & Hadden, J. K. (1974). Introduction. InL. H. Masotti & J. K. Hadden (Eds.), Suburbia in transition, (pp. 3–12). New York: New View Points.
   Google Scholar
• Mieszkowski, P., & Mills, E. (1993). The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 135–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. G. (2001). Urban sprawl. National Geographic, 200(1), 48–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ndubisi, F., & Dyer, M. (1992). The role of regional entities in formulating and implementing statewide growth policies. State and Local Government Review, 24, 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C. (1991). Blazing new planning trails in Oregon. InJ. M. DeGrove, Balanced growth: A planning guide for local government (pp. 130–136). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C. (1995). Growth management and the savings and loan bailout. The Urban Lawyer, 27(1), 71–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., Pendall, R., Dawkins, C. J., & Knaap, G. J. (2002). The link between growth management and housing affordability: The academic evidence. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., Martin, J., & Fulton, W. (2002). Holding the line: Urban containment in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, F. J. (1981). The politics of land-use reform. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, D. R. (1997). Managing growth in America’s communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V., & Kantor, P. (2002). Cities in the international marketplace: The political economy of urban development in North America and West Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V., & Vogel, R. K. (2000). Paths to new regionalism. State and Local Government Review, 32(3), 158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Q. (1996). Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: The San Francisco Bay region in the 1980s. Environment and Planning B, 23(1), 61–91.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Q., & Zhang, F. (2005). Land use changes in a pro-smart growth state: Maryland, USA. Working Paper, School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Theil, H. (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassmer, R. W. (2006). The influence of local urban containment policies and statewide growth management on the size of United States urban areas. Journal of Regional Science, 46(1), 25–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz, J. (1999). From quiet revolution to smart growth: State growth management programs, 1960 to 1999. Journal of Planning Literature, 14(2), 266–337.
   Google Scholar
• Weitz, J., & Morre, T. (1998). Development inside urban growth boundaries: Oregon’s empirical evidence of contiguous urban form. Journal of American Planning Association, 64(4), 424–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2000). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar