Early Resident Experiences at a New Mixed-Income Development in Chicago

REFERENCES

• Bailey, N., Haworth, A., Manzi, T., Paranagamage, P., Roberts, M. (2006). Creating and sustaining mixed income communities. Coventry, UK: Chartered Institute of Housing/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., Buron, L., & Holin, M. (2000). Interim assessment of the HOPE VI Program: Case study of Hillside Terrace in Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Final Report. Washington, DC: Abt Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Larry. (1998). Do we really wish to live in a communitarian city? Communitarian thinking and the redevelopment of Chicago’s Cabrini-Green public housing complex. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(2), 99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berube, A. (2005). Mixed communities in England: A U.S. perspective on evidence and policy prospects. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation:
   Google Scholar
• Breitbart, M. M., & Pader, E. J. (1995). Establishing ground: Representing gender and race in a mixed housing development. Gender, Place and Culture, 2(1), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 177–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (1997). Moving up versus moving out: Neighborhood effects in housing mobility programs. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 195–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, P. C., & Smith, R. N. (1997). Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy and Development Research, 3(2), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Buron, L., Popkin, S., Levy, D., Harris, L., & Khadduri, J. (2002). The HOPE VI resident tracking study: A snapshot of the current living situation of original residents from eight sites. A report prepared by Abt. Associates, Inc. and the Urban Institute for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., & Vidal, Avis. (2001). Building community capacity. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Housing Authority. (2005). FY2006 Annual Plan: Plan for Transformation Year 7. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Housing Authority. (2006). FY2007 Annual Plan: Plan for Transformation Year 8. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (2007). Neighbourhood social mix as a goal of social policy: A theoretical analysis. European Journal of Housing Policy, 7(1), 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. (2003). Housing dispersal programs. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1), 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. (1996). Scattered-site housing: Characteristics and consequences. Seattle, Washington: Prepared for The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Holin, M., & Amendolia, J. (2001). Interim assessment of the HOPE VI Program: Case study of Ellen Wilson Dwellings in Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M. (1975). Sociological theory and social control. The American Journal of Sociology, 81(1), 82–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A. (1997). Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A., & Bane, M. J. (1990). Ghetto poverty: Basic questions. InL. E. Lynn & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner city poverty in the United States (pp. 16–67). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. InL. E. Lynn & M. G. H. McGeary, (Eds.) Inner city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L. (2006) Is mixed-income development an antidote to urban poverty? Housing Policy Debate, 17(2), 209–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 369–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadduri, J. (2001). Deconcentration: What do we mean? What do we want? Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5(2), 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2001a) Neighborhood relations in suburban scattered-site and clustered public housing. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(3–4), 409–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2001b). The role of neighborhood social networks in scattered-site public housing residents’ search for jobs. Housing Policy Debate, 12(3), 541–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2005). HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1413–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhauser, R. R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., & Vaughn, J. C. (1981a). Social resources and strengths of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4), 393–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N., Vaughn, J. C. & Ensel, W. M. (1981b). Social resources and occupational attainment. Social Forces, 59(4), 1164–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (1998). Mixed income public housing: Outcomes for tenants and their community: A case study of the Lake Parc Place development in Chicago, Illinois. Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Metropolitan Planning Council. (2003). CHA Plan for Transformation July 2003 Progress Report. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., & Andersson, R. (2005). Housing mix, social mix and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 761–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, L., Feins, J. D., Jacob, R., Beecroft, E., Sanbonmatsu, L., Katz, L. B., et al. (2003). Moving to opportunity for Fair Housing Program: Interim impacts evaluation. Report prepared by Abt Associates, Inc. and the National Bureau of Economic Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pader, E. J., & Breitbart, M. M. (1993). Transforming public housing: Conflicting visions for Harbor Point. Places, 8(4), 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pattillo, M. (2007). Black on the block: The politics of race and class in the city. Chicago: IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J. (2007). Testimony before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation, and Community Development, and the U.S. House Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity.Available at http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/901088_HOPE_VI.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunningham, M., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. (2004). A decade of Hope VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Cunningham, M., & Burt, M. (2005). Public housing transformation and the hard-to-house. Housing Policy Debate, 16(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts, E. R., & Sawhill, I. V. (1986). Defining and measuring the underclass. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Roessner, J. (2000). A decent place to live: From Columbia Point to Harbor Point. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., Stroh, L. K., & Flynn, C. A. (1998). Lake Parc Place: A study of mixed-income housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4), 703–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. (1995). Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux program. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 231–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J., Popkin, S. J., Kaufmann, J. E., & Rusin, J. (1991). Social integration of low-income black adults in middle-class white suburbs. Social Problems, 38(4), 448–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, W., Sloan, A., Seferi, M., & Werby, E. (1974). All in together: An evaluation of mixed-income multi-family housing. Boston: Housing Finance Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Salama, J. (1999). The redevelopment of distressed public housing: Early results from HOPE IV projects in Atlanta. Chicago, and San Antonio. Housing Policy Debate, 10(1), 95–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Groves, B. W. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A., & Kian, T. (1997). Mixed income housing: Unanswered questions. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy and Development Research, 3(2), 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, E., Lupton, R., & Fenton, A. (2005). A good place for children? Attracting and retaining families in inner urban mixed income communities. London: Chartered Institute of Housing/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2002). Mixed-income housing developments: Promise and reality. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. L. (2001). Mixing it up: Public housing redevelopment in Chicago. Paper presented at the conference: Area-based initiatives in contemporary urban policy. Danish Building and Urban Research and European Urban Research Association. Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Turbov, M., & Piper, V. (2005). HOPE VI and mixed-finance redevelopments: A catalyst for neighborhood renewal. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 833–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2007). About HOPE VI Website. Available at http://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/programs/ph/hope6/about/index.cfm#6. Accessed December 13, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, L. J. (1998). Comment on James E. Rosenbaum, Linda K. Stroh, and Cathy A. Flynn’s “Lake Parc Place: A study of mixed-income housing.” Housing Policy Debate, 9(4), 749–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale, L. J. (2006). Comment on Mark Joseph’s “Is mixed-income development an antidote to urban poverty?” Housing Policy Debate, 17(2), 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., Raffel, J. A., Sweeney, S., & Denson, L. (2005). Attracting middle income families in the HOPE VI public housing revitalization program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(2), 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar