The Geography of Insecurity: Spatial Change and the Flexibilization of Labor in Metro Manila

REFERENCES

• Baum, S. (1997). Sydney, Australia: A global city? Testing the social polarization thesis. Urban Studies, 34(11), 1881–1901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, S. (1999). Social transformations in the global city: Singapore. Urban Studies, 36(7), 1095–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berner, E. (1997). Defending a place in the city: Localities and the struggle for urban land in Metro Manila. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berner, E. (2000). Poverty alleviation and eviction of the poorest: Towards urban land reform in the Philippines. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3), 554–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berner, E., & Korff, R. (1996). Globalization and local resistance: The creation of localities in Manila and Bangkok. International Journal for Urban and Regional Research, 19(2), 208–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M., & Portes, A. (1989). World underneath: The origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy. InA. Portes, M. Castells, & L. Benton (Eds.), The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed countries (pp. 11–37). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravorty, S. (2000). From colonial city to globalizing city?: The far-from-complete spatial transformation of Calcutta. InP. Marcuse & R. Van Kempen (Eds.), Globalizing cities: A new spatial order. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, S., & Lui, T. (2004). Testing the global city-social polarisation thesis: Hong Kong since the 1990s. Urban Studies, 41(10), 1863–1888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daenekindt, R., & Gonzales-Rosario, M. (2003). How cheap can we get?: A survey of the situation of contractual workers in selected industries in and nearby Metro Manila. Pasig City: LARIDE.
   Google Scholar
• Douglass, M., & Jones, G. (2004). The morphology of MUR expansion. Paper presented at the Conference on Growth Dynamics in Mega-Urban Regions in Asia, National University of Singapore, Singapore, June 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, C., Kuruvilla, S., Ofreneo, R., & Ortiz, M. (2003). From core to periphery? Recent developments in employment relations in the Philippines. Industrial Relations, 42(3), 368–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2001). Inequality in global city-regions. InA. Scott (Ed.), Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1995). Where we stand: A decade of world city research. InP. Knox & P. Taylor (Eds.), World cities in a world-system (pp. 21–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamnett, C. (1994). Social polarization in global cities: Theory and evidence. Urban Studies, 31(3), 401–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., Tsay, C., & Bajracharya, B. (1999). Demographics and employment change in megacities of Southeast and East Asia. Australia National University. Working Papers in Demography no. 80.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. (2000). Landscapes of globalization: Human geographies of economic change in the Philippines. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuruvilla, S., & Erickson, C. (2002). Change and transformation in Asian industrial relations. Industrial Relations, 41(2), 171–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamas, S., Jones, G., & Sastrasuanda, T. (2001). A zonal analysis of demographic change in Indonesia’s megacities. Third World Planning Review, 23(2), 155–174.
   Google Scholar
• Marcotullio, P. (2001). Asian urban sustainability in the era of globalization. Habitat International, 25(4), 577–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. (1997). The enclave, the citadel, and the ghetto: What has changed in the post-Fordist US city. Urban Affairs Review, 33(2), 228–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P., & Van Kempen, R. (2000). Globalizing cities: A new spatial order. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, T. (1991). The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis. InN. Ginsburg, B. Koppel, & T. McGee (Eds.), The extended metropolis: Settlement transition in Asia (pp. 3–26). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mollenkopf, J., & Castells, M. (1991). Introduction. InJ. Mollenkopf & M. Castells (Eds). Dual city: Restructuring New York (pp. 3–23). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• National Statistics Office (2003). Philippine statistical yearbook, 2003. Mandaluyong: NSO.
   Google Scholar
• Racelis, R., & Collado, M. (2004). Metro Manila: Continuing magnet for migrants. Paper presented at the Conference on Growth Dynamics in Mega-Urban Regions in Asia, National University of Singapore, Singapore, June 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Jiminez, P., Chiong-Javier, M., & Sevilla, J. (1986). Philippine urban situation analysis. Manila: UNICEF.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2002). Global and world cities: A view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 531–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salcedo, R., & Torres, A. (2004). Gated communities in Santiago: Wall or frontier International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its discontents. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A., Agnew, J., Soja, E., & Storper, M. (2001). Global city-regions. InA. Scott (Ed.), Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shameen, A. (2006). The Philippines awesome outsourcing opportunity. Business Week, September 19.
   Google Scholar
• Shatkin, G. (2008). The city and the bottom line: Urban megaprojects and the privatization of planning in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning A, 40(2), 383–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicat, G. (2004). Reforming the Philippine labor market. Discussion Paper No. 0404, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, P. (2006). Social polarization: Comparing Singapore, Hong Kong and Taipei. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1737–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. (1976). Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments. London: Marion Boyars.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Commission on Human Settlements (UNCHS) (2005). Financing urban shelter: Global report on human settlements 2005. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Walks, A. (2001). The social ecology of the post-Fordist/global city? Economic restructuring and socio-spatial polarization in the Toronto urban region. Urban Studies, 38(3), 407–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2004). A tale of three cities: Urban rail concessions in Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, and Manila. Report prepared by the Halcrow Group Limited, December 2.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D., & Martinez, C. (2005). Remittances and poverty in migrants’ home areas: Evidence from the Philippines. InC. Ozden & M. Schiff (Eds.), International migration, remittances, and the brain drain. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar