Relocating the Poor: Social Capital and Neighborhood Resources

REFERENCES

• Altman, I., & Low, S. (Eds.) (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (2006). Neighbourhoods and the impacts of social mix: Crime, tenure diversification, and assisted mobility. Tasmania, Australia: Housing and Community Research Unit, School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, T. (2003). Urban bonds. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, T., & Savage, M. (2008). Networked urbanism: Social capital in the city. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. InJ. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de S. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 177–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, P., & Smith, R. (1997). Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 3(2), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 259–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Richman, H. (1997). Neighborhood effects and state and local policy. InJ. Brooks-Gunn, G. Duncan, & L. Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Policy implications in studying neighborhoods (Vol. II, pp. 164–181). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Buron, L., Popkin, S. J., Levy, D., Harris, L. E., & Khadduri, J. (2002). The HOPE VI resident tracking study. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cantle, T. (2001). Community cohesion: A report of the independent review team. London: Home Office, Minister of State.
   Google Scholar
• Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2004). HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties. Housing Policy Debate, 15(2), 415–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley, A. M. (2004). Maverick Gardens HOPE VI evaluation: Findings from in-depth interviews on phase I relocation. Boston, MA: Center for Urban and Regional Policy, Northeastern University.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, A. M. (2009). Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(2-3), 227–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley, A. M. (Forthcoming, 2010). HOPE VI—A viable strategy for improving neighborhood conditions and resident self-sufficiency? Housing Policy Debate, 20(1).
   Google Scholar
• Curley, A. M., & Fitzgerald, J. (2006). Fourth year evaluation of the Boston housing authority’s HOPE VI project at Maverick Gardens. Boston, MA: Center for Urban and Regional Policy, Northeastern University.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, A. M., & Fitzgerald, J. (2007). All we hoped for? Maverick HOPE VI final resident survey results. Boston, MA: Center for Urban and Regional Policy, Northeastern University.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., & Bolt, G. (2005). Social cohesion in post-war estates in the Netherlands: Differences between socioeconomic and ethnic groups. Urban Studies, 42(13), 2447–2470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., & Filipovic, M. (2008). The influence of physical measures on social cohesion in large housing estates: Case studies in the Netherlands and Slovenia compared. InRESTATE, Second Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighborhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulkerson, G. M., & Thompson, G. H. (2008). The evolution of a contested concept: A meta-analysis of social capital definitions and trends (1988–2006). Sociological Inquiry, 78(4), 536–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, S. (2002). Social capital and deconcentration: Theoretical and policy paradoxes of the HOPE VI program. North American Dialogue, 5(1), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, A. M., & Wierzbicki, S. K. (1999). Social ties at the neighborhood level: Two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review, 35(1), 92–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. InL. Lynn & M. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R. (2004). Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, 367–390.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R., Priemus, H., & Engbersen, G. (2007). Understanding social capital in recently restructured urban neighbourhoods: Two case studies in Rotterdam. Urban Studies, 44(5–6), 1069–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2001). The role of neighborhood social networks in scattered-site public housing residents’ search for jobs. Housing Policy Debate, 12(3), 541–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2005). HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning, 37, 1413–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, J., Liebman, J., & Katz, L. (2005). Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? Urban Studies, 45(12), 2449–2470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, T., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Kamerman, S. (1997). Communities as place, face, and space: Provisions of services to poor, urban children and their families. InJ. Brooks-Gunn, G. Duncan & L. Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Policy implications in studying neighborhoods (Vol. II, pp. 182–205). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Liebow, E. (1967). Tally’s corner: A study of Negro streetcorner men. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, M., Bailey, N., & Kearns, A. (2008). People’s attachment to place: The influence of neighbourhood deprivation. Glasgow, UK: Joseph Rowentree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lofland, L. H. (1973). A world of strangers: Order and action in urban public space. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 504–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spacial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, L., Feins, J., Jacob, R., Beecroft, E., Sanbonmatsu, L., Katz, L., et al. (2003). Moving to opportunity interim impacts evaluation. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. D., Krivo, L. J., & Harris, M. A. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(1), 31–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkster, F. M. (2007). Localised social networks, socialisation and social mobility in a low-income neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 44(13), 2587–2603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., Harris, L. E., Comey, J., Cunningham, M. K., & Buron, L. F. (2004). The HOPE VI program: What about the residents? Housing Policy Debate, 15(2), 385–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A., & Landolt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. American Prospect, 26, 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission (2003). Social capital: Reviewing the concept and its policy implications. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century, the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Nordic Political Science Association, 30(2), 137–174.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Pribesh, S. (2002). Disadvantage, disorder and urban mistrust. City & Community, 1(1), 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Saegert, S., & Winkel, G. (1998). Social capital and the revitalization of New York City’s distressed inner-city housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 17–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saegert, S., & Winkel, G. (2004). Crime, social capital, and community participation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(3–4), 219–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. L. (2006). Neighborhood institutions as resource brokers: Childcare centers, interorganizational ties, and resource access among the poor. Social Problems, 53(2), 274–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, M. L., Jacobs, E. M., & Massengill, R. P. (2008). Why organizational ties matter for neighborhood effects: A study of resource access through childcare centers. Social Forces, 87(1), 387–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, M. L., & McDermott, M. (2006). The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: An analysis of average and contextual effects. Social Forces, 84(3), 1697–1724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, M. L., & Newman, K. S. (2001). Urban poverty after the truly disadvantaged: The rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2002). Housing choice for HOPE VI relocatees. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, C. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a Black community. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2000a). United States 2000 census summary file 4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2000b). United States census 2000 summary file 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Van Beckhoven, E., & Van Kempen, R. (2003). Social effects of urban restructuring: A case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 18(6), 853–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bergeijk, E., Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2008, April). Social cohesion in deprived neighborhoods in the Netherlands: The effect of the use of neighborhood facilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Housing Studies Association, York, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kempen, R. (2008, April). Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Housing Studies Association, York, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). New complexities of cohesion in Britain: Super-diversity, transnationalism, and civil-integration. Wetherby, UK: Commission on Integration and Cohesion.
   Google Scholar
• Völker, B., Flap, H., & Lindenberg, S. (2007). When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch Neighbourhoods. European Sociological Review, 23(1), 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place versus cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar