Beyond Mobility:The Limits of Liberal Urban Policy

REFERENCES

• Alperovitz, G., Williamson, T., & Howard, T. (2010). The Cleveland model. The Nation, 1, 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. R. (2002). Foreword. InT. Williamson, D. Imbroscio & G. Alperovitz (Eds.), Making a place for community: Local democracy in a global era (pp. ix–xii). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bartik, T., & Erickcek, G. (2008). The local economic impact of “eds & meds.” Report prepared for the Brookings Institution’s Metro Economy Series, December. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2008/1210_metropolitan_economies_bartik_erickcek.aspx. Accessed August 7, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Reed, A. Jr. (1999). The new face of urban renewal: The near north redevelopment initiative and the Cabrini-Green neighborhood. InA. Reed, Jr. (Ed.), Without justice for all: The new liberalism and our retreat from racial equality (pp. 175–211). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., Smith, J. L., & Wright, P. (Eds.) (2006). Where are poor people to live? Transforming public housing communities. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Booza, J., Cutsinger, J., & Galster, G. (2006). Where did they go? The decline of middle-income neighborhoods in metropolitan America. Report prepared for the Brookings Institution’s Living City Census Series, June. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/metro/pubs/20060622_middleclass.pdf. Accessed August 7, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2009). Cities for people, not for profit. City, 13(2–3), 176–184.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (2005a). Introduction. InX. Briggs (Ed.), The geography of opportunity (pp. 1–16). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (2005b). Politics and policy: Changing the geography of opportunity. InX. Briggs (Ed.), The geography of opportunity (pp. 310–339). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (2008). Maximum feasible misunderstanding: A reply to Imbroscio. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(2), 131–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X., Popkin, S. J., & Goering, J. M. (2010). Moving to Opportunity: The story of an American experiment to fight ghetto poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. H., & Kutty, N. K. (Eds.) (2008). Segregation: The rising costs for America. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cashin, S. (2000). Localism, self-interest, and the tyranny of the favored quarter: Addressing the barriers to New Regionalism. Georgetown Law Review, 88, 1985–2048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashin, S. (2004). The failures of integration: How race and class are undermining the American Dream. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, H., & Engdahl, L. (Eds.) (2009). From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Comey, J. (2007). HOPE VI’d and on the move, InHOPE VI: Where do we go from here? Brief No. 1. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R. (2001). Illusion, reality, and the politics of place. The Good Society, 10(2), 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R., & Mair, A. (1988). Locality and community in the politics of local economic development. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, S. (2009). HOPE VI: What went wrong. InH. Cisneros & L. Engdahl (Eds.), From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities (pp. 229–248). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Crump, J. (2002). Deconcentration by demolition: Public housing, poverty, and urban policy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 581–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagger, R. (1997). Civic virtues: Rights, citizenship, and republican liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahrendorf, R. (1997). After 1989: Morals, revolution, and civil society. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, M. N. (1976). The politics of exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S., & Imbroscio, D. L. (Eds.) (2010). Critical urban studies: New directions. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeFilippis, J., & Fraser, J. (2010). Why do we want mixed-income housing and neighborhoods? InJ. S. Davies & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Critical urban studies: New directions (pp. 135–148). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S., & Rosenbaum, J. (2010). Residential mobility, neighborhoods, and poverty: Results from the Chicago Gautreaux Program and the Moving to Opportunity experiment. InC. Hartman & G. Squires (Eds.), The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities (pp. 185–198). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, N. A. (2006). Segregation and discrimination in housing. InR. G. Bratt, M. E. Stone & C. Hartman (Eds.), A right to housing (pp. 61–81). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1973). Opening up the suburbs: An urban strategy for America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1993). Reducing regulatory barriers to affordable housing erected by local governments. InG. T. Kingsley & M. A. Turner (Eds.), Housing markets and residential mobility (pp. 255–281). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1994). New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Dreier, P. J., Mollenkopf, J. H., & Swanstrom, T. (2004). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century (2nd Ed.). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin, S. L. (1987). City and regime in the American republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin, S. L. (2006). Reconstructing the commercial republic: Constitutional design after Madison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G. (2000). Sharing America’s neighborhoods: The prospects for stable racial integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Euchner, C., & McGovern, S. (2003). Urban policy reconsidered: Dialogues on the problems and prospects of American cities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feagin, J., & Combs, Y. (2001). Should racial integration be pursued as the only goal? InC. Hartman (Ed.), Challenges to equality: Poverty and race in America (pp. 68–70). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. S. (2002). Ever-more rooted Americans. City and Community, 1(2), 177–198.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. (2007). Falling behind: How rising inequality harms the middle class. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullilove, M. T. (2004). Root shock: How tearing up city neighborhoods hurts America, and what we can do about it. New York: One World/Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Fullilove, M. T., Hernandez-Cordero, L., & Fullilove, R. E. (2010). The ghetto game: Apartheid and the developer’s imperative in postindustrial American cities. InC. Hartman & G. Squires (Eds.), The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities (pp. 199–212). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. (2010). Concentrated poverty: A critical analysis. Challenge: The Magazine of Economic Affairs, 53(3), 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Giloth, R. P. (2007). Investing in equity: Targeted economic development for neighborhoods and cities. InM. J. Bennett & R. P. Giloth (Eds.), Economic development in American cities (pp. 23–50). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J., (Ed.) (2007). Fragile rights within cities: Government, housing and fairness. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J., & Feins, J. D. (Eds.) (2003). Choosing a better life: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. (2000, May). The new slum clearance: Redevelopment of public housing and the deconcentration of poverty. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. (2011). Gentrification in black and white: The racial impact of public housing demolition in American cities. Urban Studies, 48(8), 1581–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G., & Chapple, K. (2010a). Dispersal as anti-poverty policy. InJ. S. Davies & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Critical urban studies: New directions (pp. 149–164). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G., & Chapple, K. (2010b). You gotta move: Advancing the debate on the record of dispersal. Housing Policy Debate, 20(2), 209–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, S., Hathaway, W., Rodriguez, C., Spalding, A., & Ward, B. (2008). Deconcentration and social capital: Contradictions of a poverty alleviation policy. Journal of Poverty, 12(2), 201–228.
   Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, B. (2009). Once the American dream: Inner-ring suburbs of the metropolitan United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harkavy, I., & Zuckerman, H. (1999). Eds and meds: Cities’ hidden assets. Report prepared for the Brookings Institution, September. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/reports/1999/09cities_ira-harkavy-and-harmon-zuckerman.aspx. Accessed August 7, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, C. (1984). The right to stay put. InC. C. Geisler & F. J. Popper (Eds.), Land reform, American style (pp. 302–318). Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, C. (1991). Comment on Anthony Downs’s “The Advisory Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing. Housing Policy Debate, 2(4), 1161–1168.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, C., & Squires, G. (Eds.) (2010a). The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, C., & Squires, G. (2010b). Integration exhaustion, race fatigue, and the American Dream. InC. Hartman & G. Squires (Eds.), The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities (pp. 1–9). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haynie, D. L., & South, S. J. (2005). Residential mobility and adolescent violence. Social Forces, 84(1), 361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, S. (2006). 10 steps to repair American democracy. Sausalito, CA: PoliPoint Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houseman, G. L. (1979). The right of mobility. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. A. (1993). Antipoverty strategy, where the rubber meets the road: Transporting workers to jobs. InG. T. Kingsley & M. A. Turner (Eds.), Housing markets and residential mobility (pp. 283–310). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D.L. (2004). Can we grant a right to place? Politics and Society, 32(4), 575–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2006). Shaming the inside game: A critique of the liberal expansionist approach to addressing urban problems. Urban Affairs Review, 42(2), 224–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2008). “[U]nited and actuated by some common impulse of passion”: Challenging the dispersal consensus in American housing policy research. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(2), 111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, N., & Kwak, N. (2003). A multilevel approach to civic participation. Communication Research, 30(1), 80–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, B., & Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking U.S. rental housing policy, InN. P. Retsinas & E. S. Belsky (Eds.), Revisiting rental housing. Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. (2009). Staying in the ‘hood’: Community relocation as a centerpiece for the next generation of urban revitalization. InM. A. Turner, S. J. Popkin & L. Rawlings (Eds.), Public housing and the legacy of segregation (pp. 127–144). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, L. A. (2004). Democratic hopes in the polycentric city. Journal of Politics, 66, 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsely, G. T. (2009). Taking advantage of what we have learned. InH. Cisneros & L. Engdahl (Eds.), From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities (pp. 263–297). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kotkin, J. (2010). The next hundred million: America in 2050. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, L, Slater, T., & Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leinberger, C. B. (2008a). The option of urbanism: Investing in a new American dream. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leinberger, C. B. (2008b). The next slum? The Atlantic, March, 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J. (2006). Zoned out: Regulation, markets, and choices in transportation and metropolitan land-use. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Stults, B. J. (2011). The persistence of segregation in the metropolis: New findings from the 2010 Census, US 2010 Project. March 24. Available at: http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010/Data/Report/report2.pdf. Accessed August 7, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lucy, W. H. (2010). Foreclosing the dream: How America’s housing crisis is changing our cities and suburbs. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucy, W. H., & Phillips, D. (2006). Tomorrow’s cities, tomorrow’s suburbs. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maly, M. T. (2005). Beyond segregation: Multiracial and multiethnic neighborhoods in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. C. (2008, October). Why mixed incomes? Examining assumptions and assessing the outcomes through research. Paper presented at the AIA Conference on Innovations in Affordable Housing, Phoenix, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. C., Kleit, R. G., & Couch, D. (2008). Moving three times is like having your house on fire once. Urban Studies, 45(9), 1855–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. (2001, April). Neighborhoods as common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and development. Paper presented at the Urban Affairs Association Annual Meeting, Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, K., & Wyly, E. (2006). The right to stay put, revisited: Gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies, 43(1), 23–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A. (1999). Swimming against the tide: A brief history of federal policy in poor communities. InR. Ferguson & W. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 77–138). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M. (1998). Metropolitics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M. (2002). American Metropolitics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Pattillo, M. (2009). Investing in poor black neighborhoods “as is.” InM. A. Turner, S. J. Popkin & L. Rawlings (Eds.), Public housing and the legacy of segregation (pp. 31–46). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, and mutations. The SAIS Review, 29(1), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000a). Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 881–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000b). Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(2), 125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., & Cunningham, M. K. (2009). Has HOPE VI transformed residents’ lives? InH. Cisneros & L. Engdahl (Eds.), From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities (pp. 191–204). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunningham, M., Brown, K., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. A. (2004). A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1995). The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pribesh, S., & Downey, D. B. (1999). Why are residential moves associated with poor school performance? Demography, 36(4), 521–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provo, J. (2009). Risk-averse regionalism: The cautionary tale of Portland, Oregon and affordable housing. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, 368–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., & Zuberi, A. (2010). Comparing residential mobility programs: Design elements, neighborhood placement, and outcomes in MTO and Gautreaux. Housing Policy Debate, 20(1), 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, V. (2009). Retail development in changing neighborhoods: New markets, new investments, and the prospects for mixed-income, racially diverse populations. InM. A. Turner, S. J. Popkin & L. Rawlings (Eds.), Public housing and the legacy of segregation (pp. 47–56). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, D. (1999). Inside game/outside game: Winning strategies for saving urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. (1999). What “community” supplies. InR. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 241–292). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., Zenk, S., Israel, B., Mentz, G., Stokes, C., & Galea, S. (2008). Do neighborhood economic characteristics, racial composition, and residential stability predict perceptions of stress associated with the physical and social environment? Findings from a multilevel analysis in Detroit. Journal of Urban Health, 85(5), 642–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. (2006). Housing policy in the United States: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. M. (2003). Graceful simplicity: The philosophy and politics of the alternative American dream. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, T. M., Meschede, T., & Sullivan, L. (2010). The racial wealth gap increases fourfold. Research and policy brief. Waltham, MA: Institute on Assets and Social Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R., & Patterson, K. L. (2011). The four horsemen of the fair housing apocalypse: A critique of fair housing. Critical Sociology (forthcoming). Available at http://crs.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/01/06/0896920510396385. Accessed August 7, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2010). Integration: Solving the wrong problem. InC. Hartman & G. Squires (Eds.), The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities (pp. 229–246). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spinner-Halev, J. (2010). The trouble with diversity. InJ. S. Davies & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Critical urban studies: New directions (pp. 107–120). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, S. (1994). The effect of geographic mobility on premarital sex. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56(1), 204–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, S. (2010). The myth of concentrated poverty. InC. Hartman & G. Squires (Eds.), The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities (pp. 213–228). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., Popkin, S. J., & Rawlings, L. (Eds.). (2009). Public housing and the legacy of segregation. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, K., & Harknett, K. (2010). Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, residential stability, and perceptions of social support among new mothers. Journal of Family Issues, 31(4), 499–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vigdor, J. L. (2009). The perplexing persistence of race: Segregation and the fortunes of African-Americans, 1968–2008. InR. Inman (Ed.), Making cities work: Prospects and policies for urban America (pp. 201–225). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1990). The communitarian critique of liberalism. Political Theory, 18, 6–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1998). Pluralism and social democracy. Dissent, Winter, 47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, E., & Tyagi, A. W. (2003). The two-income trap: Why middle-class mothers and fathers are going broke. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, M. (2009, May). Challenging inequality in the new metropolis. Paper presented at the Justice and the American Metropolis conference, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. L. (2003). From HOPE VI to HOPE Sick? Dollars and Sense, 248 (July/August), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. (2010). Sprawl, justice, and citizenship: The civic costs of the American way of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T., Imbroscio, D., & Alperovitz, G. (2002). Making a place for community: Local democracy in a global era. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar