516
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

What Sexuality Is This Place? Building a Framework for Evaluating Sexualized Space: The Case of Kansas City, Missouri

&
Pages 173-193 | Published online: 30 Nov 2016

REFERENCES

  • Achilles, N. (1967). The development of the homosexual bar as an institution. InJ. H. Gagnon & W. Simon (Eds.), Sexual deviance (pp. 228–244). New York: Harper and Row.
  • Adler, S., & Brenner, J. (1992). Gender and space: Lesbians and gay men in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16, 24–34.
  • Adler, S., Brenner, J., Frisch, M., Knopp, L., & Lauria, M. (2011). Reflections on classic articles on planning and LGBT communities. InP. L. Doan (Ed.). Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 211–219). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Albrecht, C. K., Campos, B. L., & Giusti, J. (2010). The myth of the great white north. InK. P. Murphy, J. L. Pierce, & L. Knopp (Eds.), Queer twin cities (pp. 90–118). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Andersson, J. (2011). Heritage discourse and the desexualisation of public space: The “historical restorations” of Bloomsbury’s squares. Antipode . Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00960.x.
  • Bailey, B. (1999). Sex in the heartland . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Barnes, M. (2001, June 3). The voices of gay Austin. Austin American Statesman.
  • Bell, D. J. (1991). Insignificant others: Lesbian and gay geographies. Area, 23, 323–329.
  • Bell, D., & Binnie, J. (2004). Authenticating queer space: Citizenship, urbanism and governance. Urban Studies, 41, 1807–1820.
  • Bell, D., Binnie, J., Holliday, R., Longhurst, R., & Peace, R. (2001). Pleasure zones: Bodies, cities, spaces . Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
  • Bell, D., & Valentine, G. (1995). Mapping desire: Geographies of sexualities . New York: Routledge.
  • Betsky, A. (1997). Queer space . New York: William Morrow.
  • Binnie, J. (2011). Class, sexuality and space: A comment. Sexualities, 14, 21–26.
  • Binnie, J., Edensor, T., Holloway, J., Millington, S., & Young, C. (2007). Editorial: Mundane mobilities, banal travels. Social & Cultural Geography, 8, 165–174.
  • Bishop, B. (2002, June 25). Where gay households abound, geeks follow. Austin American Statesman.
  • Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2002). Why do gay men live in San Francisco? Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 54–76.
  • Boyd, N. A. (2003). Wide-open town: A history of queer San Francisco to 1965 . Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Brown, G. (2009). Thinking beyond homonormativity: Performative explorations of diverse gay economics. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1496–1510.
  • Browne, K. (2006a). Challenging queer geographies. Antipode, 38, 885–893.
  • Browne, K. (2006b). “A right geezer-bird (man-woman)”: The sites and sights of “female” embodiment. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 5, 121–143.
  • Browne, K., Lim, J., & Brown, G. (2007). Geographies of sexualities: Theory, practices, and politics . Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Campo, D., & Ryan, B. (2008). The entertainment zone: Unplanned nightlife and the revitalization of the American downtown. Journal of Urban Design, 13, 291–315.
  • Canon, S. (1994, March 20). Midwestern oasis, but no gay paradise. Kansas City’s lesbians and gay men long have been mostly invisible to the surrounding straight majority. Now they are … speaking out. Kansas City Star.
  • Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movement . Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Chamberland, L. (1993). Remembering lesbian bars: Montreal, 1955–1975. Journal of Homosexuality, 25, 231–269.
  • Chapman, T. (2011). Queering the political economy: Anti-discrimination law and the urban regime in Orlando, Florida. InP. L. Doan (Ed.). Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 145–155). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Civil Rights Commission. (1991, October 1). Draft recommendation to mayor and other governmental organizations. Scoops Phillips Collection.
  • Coleman-Tobi, D. (2009, March 27). Power & light dress code is strictly enforced … and under fire. KC Tribune . Retrieved February 18, 2010, from http://kctribune.com/article.cfm?articleID=18732.
  • Cook, C. C., & Russ, N. M. (1984). Factors influencing the residential location of female householders. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20, 78–96.
  • Doan, P. L. (2007). Queers in the American city: Transgendered perceptions of urban spaces. Gender, Place, and Culture, 14, 57–74.
  • Doan, P. L. (2010). The tyranny of gendered spaces: Reflections from beyond the gender dichotomy. Gender, Place and Culture, 17, 635–654.
  • Doan, P. L. (2011a). Why question planning assumptions and practices about queer spaces? InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 1–18). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Doan, P. L. (2011b). Queerying identity: Planning and the tyranny of gender. InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 89–106). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Doan, P. L. (2011c). Conclusions and reflections for the future: Reframing planning practice. InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 221–230). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Doan, P. L., & Higgins, H. (2011). The demise of queer space? Resurgent gentrification and the assimilation of LGBT neighborhoods. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 6–25.
  • Dubrow, G. (2011). Lavender landmarks revisited: Advancing an LGBT preservation agenda. InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 53–70). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Edelman, M. (1995). From art to politics . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Escoffier, J. (1975). Stigmas, work environment, and economic discrimination against homosexuals. Homosexual Counseling Journal, 2, 8–17.
  • Ettore, E. M. (1978). Women, urban social movement and the lesbian ghetto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2, 499–520.
  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life . New York: Basic Books.
  • Forest, B. (1995). West Hollywood as symbol: The significance of place in the construction of a gay identity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13, 133–157.
  • Forsyth, A. (1997a). NoHo: Upscaling main street on the metropolitan edge. Urban Geography, 18, 622–652.
  • Forsyth, A. (1997b). “Out” in the valley. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21, 36–60.
  • Forsyth, A. (2001). Nonconformist populations and planning sexuality and space: Nonconformist populations and planning practice. Journal of Planning Literature, 15, 339–358.
  • Forsyth, A. (2011). Queerying planning practice: Understanding non-conformist populations. InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 21–52). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Frisch, M. (2002). Planning as a heterosexist project. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 254–266.
  • Gilmartin, K. (1996). “We weren’t bar people”: Middle-class lesbian identities and cultural spaces. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 3, 1–51.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life . Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Goffman, E. (2005). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Gorman-Murray, A. (2011). Queerying planning in Australia: The problems and possibilities of multiscalar governance for LGBT sexual minorities. InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 129–143). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America . New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Gregson, N., & Rose, G. (2000). Taking Butler elsewhere: Performativities, spatialities and subjectivities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 433–452.
  • Haider-Markel, D. P. (2002). Regulating hate: State and local influences on hate crime law enforcement. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 2, 126–160.
  • Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives . New York: New York University Press.
  • Harry, J. (1974). Urbanization and the gay life. The Journal of Sex Research, 10, 238–247.
  • Hayden, D. (2005). What would a non-sexist city be like? Speculations on housing, urban design, and human work. InS. S. Fainstein & L. Servon (Eds.), Gender and planning: A reader (pp. 47–64). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Hendler, S., & Backs, M. (2011). Querying planning (theory): Alphabet soup or paradox city? InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 71–87). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Herdt, G., & Boxer, A. (1992). Introduction: Culture, history and life course of gay men. InG. Herdt (Ed), Gay culture in America: Essays from the field (pp. 1–28). Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Herring, S. (2010). Another country: Queer anti-urbanism . New York: New York University Press.
  • Hodge, S. (1995). “No fags out there”: Gay men, identity and suburbia. Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, 1, 41–48.
  • Holliday, R. (1999). The comfort of identity. Sexualities, 2, 475–491.
  • Holliday, R., & Thompson, G. (2001). A body of work. InR. Holliday & G. Thompson (Eds.), Contested bodies (pp. 117–133). New York: Routledge.
  • Hooker, E. (1967). The homosexual community. InH. Gagnon & W. Simon (Eds.), Sexual deviance (pp. 167–184). New York: Harper and Row.
  • Howard, C. (2009, October). Sexurbanization: Metropolitan development, urban renewal, and the politics of ‘straightness’ in postwar San Francisco. Paper presented at the National Conference on Planning History, Oakland, CA.
  • Howard, J. (1999). Men like that: A southern queer history . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Hoxworth, D. H., & Thomas, J. C. (1993). Economic development decision making in a fragmented polity: Convention center expansion in Kansas City. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, 275–292.
  • Hubbard, P. (2008). Here, there, everywhere: The ubiquitous geographies of heteronormativity. Geography Compass, 2/3, 640–658.
  • Hubbard, P. (2009). Opposing striptopia: The embattled spaces of adult entertainment. Sexualities, 12, 721–745.
  • Hubbard, P. (2011). Planning for sex/work. InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 169–184). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Hubbard, P., Matthews, R., Scoular, J., & Agustin, L. (2008). Away from prying eyes? The urban geographies of “adult entertainment. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 363–381.
  • Hubbard, P., & Whowell, M. (2008). Revisiting the red light district: Still neglected, immoral and marginal? Geoforum, 39, 1743–1755.
  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities . New York: Random House.
  • Johnson, E. (2008). Sweet tea: Black gay men of the South . Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
  • Kennedy, E. L., & Davis, M. D. (1993). Boots of leather, slippers of gold: The history of a lesbian community . New York: Routledge.
  • Kenney, M. (1998). Remember, Stonewall was a riot: Understanding gay and lesbian experience in the city. InL. Sandercock (Ed.), Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history (pp. 120–132). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Kidder, T. (1999). Home town . New York, NY: Random House.
  • Kirkey, K., & Forsyth, A. (2001). Men in the valley: Gay male life on the suburban-rural fringe. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 421–441.
  • Knopp, L. (1990a). Exploiting the rent gap: The theoretical significance of using illegal appraisal schemes to encourage gentrification in New Orleans. Urban Geography, 11, 48–64.
  • Knopp, L. (1990b). Some theoretical implications of gay involvement in an urban land market. Political Geography Quarterly, 9, 337–352.
  • Knopp, L. (2007). From lesbian and gay to queer geographies: Pasts, prospects and possibilities. InK. Browne, J. Lim, & G. Brown (Eds.), Geographies of sexualities: Theories, practices and politics (pp. 21–28). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Latham, A. (2003a). Urbanity, lifestyle and making sense of the new urban cultural economy: Notes from Auckland, New Zealand. Urban Studies, 40, 1699–1724.
  • Latham, A. (2003b). Research, performance, and doing human geography: Some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1993–2017.
  • Lauria, M., & Knopp, L. (1985). Toward an analysis of the role of gay communities in the urban renaissance. Urban Geography, 6, 152–169.
  • Laurier, E. (2004). The spectacular showing: Houdini and the wonder of ethnomethodology. Human Studies, 27, 377–399.
  • Laurier, E. (2008a). How breakfast happens in a café. Time & Society, 17, 119–134.
  • Laurier, E. (2008b). Drinking up endings: Conversational resources of the café. Language and Communication, 28, 165–181.
  • Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2004). Ethnoarchaeology and undefined investigations. Environment and Planning A, 36, 421–436.
  • Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2006a). Cold shoulders and napkins handed: Gestures of responsibility. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 193–207.
  • Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2006b). Possible geographies: A passing encounter in a café. Area, 38, 353–363.
  • Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2007). “A parcel of muddling muckworms”: Revisiting Habermas and the English coffee-houses. Social & Cultural Geography, 8, 259–281.
  • Laurier, E., Whyte, A., & Buckner, K. (2001). An ethnography of a neighbourhood café: Informality, table arrangements and background noise. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 2, 195–232.
  • Lockard, D. (1985). The lesbian community: An anthropological approach. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 83–95.
  • Loyd, B., & Rowntree, L. (1978). Radical feminists and gay men in San Francisco: Social space in dispersed communities. InD. A. Lanegran & R. Palm (Eds.), An invitation to geography (pp. 78–88). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lugosi, P. (2009). The production of hospitable space: Commercial propositions and consumer co-creation in a bar operation. Space and Culture, 12, 396–411.
  • Lynch, F. R. (1987). Non-ghetto gays: A sociological study of suburban homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 13, 13–42.
  • Lynch, K. (1984). Good city form . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • McNee, B. (1984). It takes one to know one. Transition: Quarterly Journal of the Socially and Ecologically Responsible Geographers, 14, 2–15.
  • Mort, F. (1998). Cityscapes: Consumption, masculinities and the mapping of London since 1950. Urban Studies, 35, 889–907.
  • Mort, F. (1999). Mapping sexual London: The Wolfenden Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution 1954–57. New Formations, 37, 92–113.
  • Mumford, L. (1940). Culture of cities . London: Secker & Warburg.
  • Myrdahl, T. M. (2011). Queerying creative cities. InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 157–166). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Packard, C. (2005). Queer cowboys and other erotic male friendships in nineteenth-century American literature . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Peake, L. (1993). “Race” and sexuality: Challenging the patriarchal structuring of urban social space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11, 415–432.
  • Pierce, J. L. (2010). Queer twin cities. InK. P. Murphy, J. L. Pierce, & L. Knopp (Eds.), Queer twin cities (pp. xi–xxvii). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Podmore, J. A. (2001). Lesbians in the crowd: Gender, sexuality and visibility along Montreal’s Boul. St-Laurent. Gender, Place and Culture, 8, 333–355.
  • Podmore, J. A. (2006). Gone “underground”? Lesbian visibility and the consolidation of queer space in Montreal. Social and Cultural Geography, 7, 595–625.
  • Prior, J., & Crofts, P. (2011). Queerying urban governance: The emergence of sex industry premises into the planned city. InP. L. Doan (Ed.), Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice (pp. 185–208). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Retter, Y. (1997). Lesbian spaces in Los Angeles, 1970–90. InG. B. Ingram, A.-M. Bouthilette, & Y. Retter (Eds.), Queers in space: Communities, public places, sites of resistance (pp. 325–338). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
  • Rosenthal, D. B. (1996). Gay and lesbian political mobilization and regime responsiveness in four New York cities. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 45–70.
  • Rothenberg, T., (1995). ‘And she told two friends’: Lesbians creating urban social space. InD. Bell & G. Valentine (Eds.), Mapping desire: Geographies of sexualities (pp. 150–165). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Valentine, G. (1993a). Desperately seeking Susan: A geography of lesbian friendships. Area, 25, 109–116.
  • Valentine, G. (1993b). (Hetero)sexing space: Lesbian perceptions and experiences of everyday spaces. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11, 395–413.
  • Valentine, G. (1995). Out and about: Geographies of lesbian landscapes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19, 96–111.
  • Valentine, G. (1996). (Re)negotiating the “heterosexual street”: Lesbian production of space. InN. Duncan (Ed.), Bodyspace: Destabilizing geographies of gender and sexuality (pp. 145–154). London: Routledge.
  • Wald, K. D., Button, J. W., & Rienzo, B. A. (1996). The politics of gay rights in American communities: Explaining antidiscrimination ordinances and policies. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 1152–1178.
  • Warner, M. (1993). Fear of a queer planet . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Warren, C. A. B. (1974). Identity and community in the gay world . New York: John Wiley.
  • Weightman, B. A. (1980). Gay bars as private places. Landscape, 24, 9–16.
  • Weightman, B. A. (1981). Commentary: Towards a geography of the gay community. Journal of Cultural Geography, 1, 106–112.
  • Winters, C. (1979). The social identity of evolving neighborhoods. Landscape, 23, 8–14.
  • Wolf, D. G. (1979). The lesbian community . Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Wolfe, M. (1992). Invisible women in invisible places: Lesbians, lesbian bars, and the social production of people/environment relationships. Architecture & Comportement = Architecture & Behaviour, 8, 137–158.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.