Indicators of Financial Condition in Pre- and Post-Merger Louisville

REFERENCES

• Barnes, W. R., & Ledebur, L. C. (1998). The new regional economics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, J. E., & Gamble, D. (1984). City/county consolidation and economies of scale: Evidence from a time-series analysis in Jacksonville, Florida. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berne, R., & Schramm, R. (1986). Financial analysis of governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist, W., & Parks, R. B. (1995). Fiscal, service, and political impacts of Indianapolis-Marion County’s Unigov. Publius, 25(4), 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, D. A. (1963). Metropolitics: The Nashville consolidation. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (1992). Local government structure and performance: Lessons from America? Public Administration, 70, 332–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, B. S., & Strauss, R. P. (1992). Municipal consolidation. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27, 615–630.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coomer, J. C., & Tyer, C. B. (1985). Nashville metropolitan government: The first decade. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1994). New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Carr, J. B. (1997). A reassessment of city/county consolidation: Economic development impacts. State and Local Government Review, 29, 166–171.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Carr, J. B., & Johnson, L. S. (2006). Structuring the debate on consolidation: A response to Leland and Thurmaier. Public Administration Review, 66, 274–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch rates Louisville Metro Government, KY’s $31MM GOs “AA+.” (2004, November 9). Retrieved from http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20041109005858/en/Fitch-Rates-Louisville-Metro-Government-KYs-31MM.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch rates Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, KY’s GO bonds “AAA”; Outlook stable. (2010, October 25). Retrieved from http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20101025007216/en/Fitch-Rates-Louisville-Jefferson-County-Metro-Government-KYs.
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (1999). GASB Statement No. 34. Basic financial statements—and management’s discussion and analysis—for state and local governments. Norwalk, CT: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, D. (1964). A comparison of predictions and experience with Nashville “Metro.” Urban Affairs Quarterly, 1, 34–54.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, S. M., Godsey, M., & Shulman, M. A. (1981). Financial indicators for local government. Public Budgeting & Finance, 1(2), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, S. M., & Valente, M. G. (1980). Evaluating financial condition: A handbook for local government Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ives, M. (2006). Assessing municipal financial condition. New York: Wagner Graduate School of Public Services, New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Leland, S. M., & Thurmaier, K. (2004). Case studies of city-county consolidation: Reshaping the local government landscape. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Louisville Metro Revenue Description. (2012) Retrieved June 8, 2012, from http://www.louisvilleky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/FE1AEBD3-EBDD-4813--9374-BB416967925B/0/RevenueDescription.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. (2000). A transaction costs model of metropolitan governance: Allocation vs. redistribution in urban America. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 49–78.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., & Scorsone, E. (2011). Cost ramifications of municipal consolidation: A comparative analysis. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32, 311–337.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., & Schiff, J. H. (2011). City-county consolidations: Promise versus performance. State and Local Government Review. 43, 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, D. M. (2006). A manageable system of economic condition analysis for governments. In H. A. Frank (Ed.), Public financial management. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., Brudney, J. L., & Bohte, J. (2012). Applied statistics for public and nonprofit administration (8th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, L. A. (2004). Same governance, different day: Does metropolitan reorganization make a difference? Review of Policy Research, 21, 595–611.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C., & Roenigk, D. J. (2011). Implementation of financial condition analysis in local government. Public Administration Quarterly, 35, 236–264.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C., Roenigk, D. J., & Allison, G. S. (2009). Communicating financial condition to elected officials in local government. Popular Government, 75(1), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C., Roenigk, D. J. & Allison, G. S. (2010). Conceptualizing financial condition in local government. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, 22, 149–177.
   Google Scholar
• Rosentraub, M. S. (2000). City-county consolidation and the rebuilding of image: The fiscal lessons from Indianapolis’ uniGov program. State and Local Government Review, 32, 180–191.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, D. (1995). Cities without suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V., & Vogel, R. K. (2004). Suburbs without a city: Power and city-county consoidation. Urban Affairs Review, 39, 758–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V., Vogel, R. K., & Ye, L. (2009). Louisville transformed but hardly changed: A survey of a city before and after merger. In D Phares (Ed.), Governing Metropolitan Regions in the 21st Century (pp. 164–184). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V., Vogel, R. K., & Ye, L. (2010). Beyond the rhetoric: Lessons from Louisville’s consolidation. American Review of Public Administration, 40(1), 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (1989). The competitive city. The political economy of suburbia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seamon, F., & Feiock, R. C. (1995). Political participation and city/county consolidation: Jacksonville-Duval County. International Journal of Public Administration, 18, 1741–1752.
   Google Scholar
• Segedy, J. A., & Lyons, T. S. (2001). Planning the Indianapolis region: Urban resurgence, de facto regionalism and uniGov. Planning Practice & Research, 16, 293–305.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, G. R., & Wilkstrom, N. (2000). Metropolitan government and governance: Theoretical perspectives, empirical analysis, and the future. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, B. E. (2000). Quandaries of pragmatic reform: A reassessment of the Jacksonville experience. State and Local Government Review, 32, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Dennis, L. & Tu, Y. S. (2007). Measuring financial condition: A study of US states. Public Budgeting and Finance, 27, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Zuzak, C. A., McNeil, K. E., & Bergerson, F. (1971). Beyond the ballot: Organized citizen participation in metropolitan Nashville. Nashville: Urban Observatory of Metropolitan Nashville and Bureau of Public Administration of the University of Tennessee.
   Google Scholar