A case study of a freshwater pearl mussel (margaritifera margaritifera) population in central sweden

References

• APHA, 1971: Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 13th Edition. American Public Health Association. Washington DC. 874 p..
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, G., 1988: Threats to the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera in Central Europe. Biological Conservation, 45 (4): 239–245.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, G., 2001: Factors affecting naiad occurrence and abundance. In: Bauer, G. and Wächtler, K. (eds): Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionida. Springer Verlag. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Bespalaya, Y. V., Bolotov, I. N. and Makhrov, A. A., 2007: State of the population of the European pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) at the NE boundary of its range. Russian Journal of Ecology, 38 (3): 204–211.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmen, D. and Kleiven, E., 2004: The impact of acidic precipitation and eutrophication on the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera in Southern Norway. Fauna Norwegica, 24: 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dunca, E. and Mutvei, H., 2001: Comparison of microgrowth pattern in Margaritifera margaritifera shells from south and north Sweden. American Malacological Bulletin, 16: 239–250.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, T., 1905: Undersökningar öfver flodpärlmusslans förekomst och lefnadsförhållanden. Meddelanden Från Kungliga Lantbruksstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., Henriksson, L. and Söderberg, H., 1998: The freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera in Sweden. Sweden Environmental Board Report. 121 p..
   Google Scholar
• Frank, H., 2007: Declining populations of freshwater mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) are burdened with heavy metals and DDT/DDE. AMBIO 36 (7): 571–574.
   Google Scholar
• Geist, J. and Auerswald, K., 2007: Physicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera). Freshwater Biology 52 (12): 2299–2316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geist, J., Porkka, M. and Kuehn, R., 2006: The status of host fish populations and fish species richness in European freshwater pearl mussel streams. Aquatic Conservation – Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16 (3): 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, L. C., Boon, P. J. and Young, M. R., 2000: Physical requirement of freshwater pearl mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Hydrobiologia, 429: 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helama, S. and Valovirta, I., 2007: Shell morphometri, pre‐mortal taphonomy and ontogeny‐related growth characteristics of freshwater pearl mussel in northern Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 44 (4): 285–302.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN, 2007: Red list of threatened species. Available at: http://www.iucn.org.
   Google Scholar
• Moog, O., Nesemann, H., Ofenboek, T. and Stundner, C., 1995: The situation of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) in Austria. Artenschutzreport, 4: 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Norrström, A‐C., 1994: Field‐measured redox potentials in soils at the groundwater‐surface water interface. European Journal of Soil Science, 45 (1): 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sandegren, R., 1938: En bestämning av högsta kustlinjen i sydvästra Hälsingland. Geologiska Föreningen i Stockholm, Förhandlingar, 60: 147–150.
   Google Scholar
• Schöne, R.S., Dunca, E., Fiebig, J. and Pfeiffer, M., 2005: Mutvei's solution: An ideal agent for resolving microgrowth structures of biogenic carbonates. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 228: 149–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valovirta, I., 1998: Conservation methods for population of Margaritifera margaritifera (L) in Finland. Journal of Conchology, Suppl. 2: 251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Ziuganov, V., Zotin, A., Nezlin, L. and Tretiakov, V., 1994: The freshwater pearl mussels and their relationships with salmonid fish. VNIRO, Russian Federal Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography. Moscow.
   Google Scholar