The logic of the construction of rural politics: political discourses on rurality in norway

References

• Aalbu, H. (1998): ‘The pendulum of regional policies in Norway and Sweden’, North9 (1): 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Aasbrenn, K., (ed.) (1996): Opp og stå, gamle Norge. 16 artikler om distriktspolitikk og lokalt utviklingsarbeid. Land‐bruksforlaget, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• Agyeman, J. and Spooner, R. (1997): ‘Ethnicity and the rural environment’, In Cloke, P. and Little, J. (eds): Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality. Routledge, London , pp.197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Amdam, R. and Bukve, O. (2004): ‘Regionalpolitisk regimeendring og regional utvikling’, In Amdam, R. and Bukve, O. (eds): Det Regionalpolitiske regimeskiftet–tilfellet Noreg. Tapir, Trondheim , pp.11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (1983): Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso, London .
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, F.,Ek, R. and Molina, I. (2007): ‘Regional enlargement and rural multi‐level governance in Sweden’, In Copus, A.K. (ed.): Continuity or Transformation? Perspectives on Rural Development in the Nordic Countries. Report 2007:4, Nordregio, Stockholm , pp.111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Arbo, P. (2004): ‘Hva har (og hva kan) regionalforskning bety for regional utvikling og politikkutforming i Norge–hva er mulig og hva er ønskelig’, lecture given at the REGUT/Nor‐wegian Research Council closing conference, Stjørdal, 21–22 April.
   Google Scholar
• Arbo, P. and Gammelsæter, H., (eds) (2004): Innovasjons‐politikkens scenografi. Nye perspektiver på næringsutvikling. Tapir, Trondheim .
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000): Liquid Modernity. Polity, Cambridge .
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1998): ‘The cosmopolitan manifesto’, New Statesman127 (4377): 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Benjaminsen, T.A. and Svarstad, H. (2008): ‘Understanding traditionalist opposition to modernization: narrative production in a Norwegian mountain conflict’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography90 (1): 49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, N.G. and Forsberg, G. (2003): ‘Rural geography and feminist geography: discourses on rurality and gender in Britain and Scandinavia’, In Öhman, J. and Simonsen, K. (eds): Voices from the North: New Trends in Nordic Human Geography. Ashgate, Aldershot , pp.173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, N.G. and Lysgård, H.K. (2001): ‘Rural development and policies–the case of post‐war Norway’, In Halfa‐cree, K.,Kovach, I. and Woodward, R. (eds): Leadership and Local Power in European Rural Development. Ashgate, London , pp.255–272.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, N.G. and Lysgård, H.K. (2004): ‘Ruralitet og urbanitet–bygd og by’, In Berg, N.G.,Dale, B.,Lysgård, H.K. and Löfgren, A. (eds): Mennesker, steder og regionale endringer. Tapir, Trondheim , pp.61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H.K. (1994): The Location of Culture. Routledge, London .
   Google Scholar
• Bonanno, A. (2006): ‘The state and rural polity’, In Cloke, P.J.,Marsden, T. and Mooney, P.H. (eds): Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage, London , pp.317–329.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2002): ‘Against the policy of depolitization’, Studies in Political Economy69: 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, M. (1994): The Countryside Ideal: Anglo‐American Images of Landscape. Routledge, London .
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2000): The Rise of the Network Society. Black‐well, Oxford .
   Google Scholar
• Cloke, P. and Little, J. (1997): ‘Conclusion: marginality and rural others’, In Cloke, P. and Little, J. (eds): Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality. Routledge, London , pp.272–285.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, J. (2006): ‘Protest against centralisation in Norway: the evolvement of the goal for maintaining a dispersed settlement pattern’, Norsk geografisk tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography60 (3): 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, J. (2009): ‘A play for rurality–modernization versus local autonomy’, Journal of Rural Studies25 (1): 98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A.,Hindess, B.,Hirst, P. and Hussain, A. (1977): Marx's ‘Capital’ and Capitalism Today, Vol. 1. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London .
   Google Scholar
• Det Norske Arbeiderparti (1953): ‘Arbeidsprogram 1953–1957. Vedtatt på landsmøtet 1953’, inNSD (2001): Vi vil…! Norske partiprogrammer 1884–2001 [CD‐ROM]. Norsk samfunnsvitenskapelig datatjeneste og Institutt for Samfunnsforskning, Bergen .
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. (2008): ‘(Re)producing a “peripheral” region–northern Sweden in the news’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography90 (4): 369–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995): Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, London .
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003): Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge, London .
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2005): ‘Critical discourse analysis’, Marges linguistiques9: 76–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. (1997): ‘“I bought my first saw with my maternity benefit”: craft production in Wales and the home as the space of (re)production’, In Cloke, P. and Little, J. (eds): Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality. Routledge, London , pp.232–251.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2005): The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent. Harper Business, New York .
   Google Scholar
• Furre, B. (1991): Vårt hundreår: norsk historie 1905–1990. Samlaget, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990): The Consequences of Modernity. Polity, Cambridge .
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1998): The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Polity, London .
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2000): ‘The Common Agricultural policy and the reinvention of the rural in the European Community’, Sociologia Ruralis40 (1): 30–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfacree, K.H. (1993): ‘Locality and social representation: space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural’, Journal of Rural Studies9 (1): 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfacree, K. (1997): ‘Postmodern perspectives on counter‐urbanisation’, In Cloke, P. and Little, J. (eds): Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality. Routledge, London , pp.70–93.
   Google Scholar
• Halfacree, K. (2006): ‘Rural space: constructing a three‐fold architecture’, In Cloke, P.J.,Marsden, T. and Mooney, P.H. (eds): Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage, London , pp.44–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hanell, T. (1998): ‘Nordic peripheries in trouble again’, North9 (1): 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen, M.S. and Villa, M. (2006): ‘Big Brother in rural societies: youths' discourses on gossip’, Norsk geografisk tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography60 (3): 209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Hersoug, B. and Leonardsen, D. (1979): Bygger de landet? Distriktspolitikk og sosialdemokrati 1945–1975. Pax, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• Hidle, K.,Cruickshank, J. and Nesje, L.M. (2006): ‘Market, commodity, resource, and strength: logics of Norwegian rurality’, Norsk geografisk tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography60 (3): 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• Høyre (2000): ‘Høyres stortingsvalgprogram 2001–2005’, in NSD (2001): Vi vil…! Norske partiprogrammer 1884–2001 [CD‐ROM]. Norsk samfunnsvitenskapelig datatjeneste og Institutt for Samfunnsforskning, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (1997): ‘Rurality and “cultures of womanhood”: domestic identities and moral order in village life’, In Cloke, P. and Little, J. (eds): Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality. Routledge, London , pp.123–137.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, O. (1995): ‘Lay discourses of the rural: developments and implications for rural studies’, Journal of Rural Studies11 (1): 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M.W. and Phillips, L. (2000): Diskursanalys som teori och metod. Studentlitteratur, Lund .
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (2001): Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd edn. Verso, London .
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. and Friedman, J., (eds) (1992): Modernity and Identity. Blackwell, Oxford .
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. (1997): ‘Employment marginality and women's self‐identity’, In Cloke, P. and Little, J. (eds): Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality. Routledge, London , pp.138–157.
   Google Scholar
• Lyson, T.A. (2006): ‘Global capital and the transformation of rural communities’, In Cloke, P.J.,Marsden, T. and Mooney, P.H. (eds): Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage, London , pp.292–303.
   Google Scholar
• Mønnesland, J. (1997): Regional Policy in the Nordic Countries: Background and Tendencies 1997. Report 1997:2, NordREFO, Stockholm .
   Google Scholar
• Mormont, M. (1990): ‘Who is rural? or, How to be rural: towards a sociology of the rural’, In Lowe, P.,Marsden, T. and Whatmore, S. (eds): Rural Restructuring: Global Processes and their Responses. David Fulton, London , pp.21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2002): ‘Radikalt demokrati eller liberalt demokrati?’, In Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C.: Det radikale demokrati: diskursteoriens politiske perspektiv. Roskilde Universitetsforlag, Frederiksberg , pp.175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. and Pratt, A.C. (1993): ‘Rural studies: modernism, postmodernism and the “post‐rural”’, Journal of Rural Studies9 (4): 411–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J.,Lowe, P.,Ward, N. and Marsden, T. (2003): The Differentiated Countryside. Routledge, London .
   Google Scholar
• NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT (19721973a): Om mål og midler i distriktsutbyggingen. Stortingsmelding 13. Kommunalog arbeidsdepartementet, Oslo [issued by the Labour Party government].
   Google Scholar
• NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT (19721973b): Tillegg til St.meld. nr. 27 for 1971–1972. Om regionalpolitikken og lands‐ og landsdelsplanlegging. Stortingsmelding 50. Miljøverndepartementet, Oslo [issued by the Coalition government].
   Google Scholar
• NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT (19961997): Om distrikts‐ og regionalpolitikken. Stortingsmelding 31. Kommunal‐ og arbeidsdepartementet, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT (20002001): Om distrikts‐ og regionalpolitikken. Stortingsmelding 34. Kommunal‐ og regional departementet, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT (20022003): Storbymeldingen: om utvikling av storbypolitikk. Stortingsmelding 31. Kommunal og regionaldepartementet, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT (20042005): Om regionalpolitikken. Stortingsmelding 25. Kommunal‐ og regionaldepartementet, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT (20052006): Hjarte for heile landet–om distrikts‐ og regionalpolitikken. Stortingsmelding 21. Kommunal‐ og regionaldepartementet, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT (20062007): Regional fortrinn–regional fremtid. Stortingsmelding 12. Kommunal‐ og regionaldepartementet, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• NOU (2004a): Effekter og effektivitet. Effekter av statlig innsats for regional utvikling og distriktspolitiske mål. Norges Offentlige Utredninger 2004:2. Kommunal‐ og regionaldepartementet, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• NOU (2004b): Livskraftige distrikter og regioner: rammer for en helhetlig og geografisk tilpasset politikk. Norges Offentlige Utredninger 2004:19. Distriktskommisjonen, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• Østerud, Ø. (1999): Globaliseringen og nasjonalstaten. Ad notam Gyldendal, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R.E. (1968): ‘The rural–urban continuum’, In Pahl, R.E. (ed.): Readings in Urban Sociology. Pergamon, Oxford , pp.263–297.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C. (1992): ‘Neglected rural geographies: a review’, Journal of Rural Studies8 (2): 193–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, T.F. (1995): ‘De lange linjer i norsk distriktspolitikk og urbaniseringsdebatt’, In Teigen, H.,Nordgreen, R. and Spilling, O.R. (eds): Langtidsliner i distriktspolitikk og tiltaksarbeid. Vett & Viten, Stabekk , pp.59–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthrof, H. (2000): ‘Globalisation and the theorisation of language’, Social Semiotics10 (2): 187–200.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, J.F. (2006a): ‘Rural youths' images of the rural’, Journal of Rural Studies22 (4): 409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rye, J.F. (2006b): ‘Heading for the cities? Gender and lifestyle patterns in rural youths' residential preferences’, Norsk geografisk tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography60 (3): 199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, D. (1997): ‘Endangering the sacred: nomads, youth cultures and the English countryside’, In Cloke, P. and Little, J. (eds): Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality. Routledge, London , pp.218–231.
   Google Scholar
• Slagstad, R. (1998): De nasjonale strateger. Pax, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• Solberg, E. (2002): Vekst–i hele landet. Regionalpolitisk redegjørelse. Kommunal‐ og regionaldepartementet, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• STORTINGET (1973): ‘3.–4. mai–1) Mål og midlar i distrikt‐sutbygginga. 2) Regionalpolitikken og lands‐ og landsdelsplanlegging’, Stortingstidende. Forhandlinger i Stortinget nr. 364 [Minutes from the parliamentary debate]. Stortinget, Oslo , pp.2853–2938.
   Google Scholar
• STORTINGET (2002): ‘7. mai–Debatt om kommunal‐ og regionalministerens redegjørelse om distrikts‐ og regionalpolitikken 30. april 2002’, Stortingstidende. Forhandlinger i Stortinget nr. 173. Stortinget , Oslo , pp.2562–2601.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, G.L.H. (2004): ‘The right to development: construction of a non‐agriculturalist discourse of rurality in Denmark’, Journal of Rural Studies20 (1): 79–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teigen, H. (1999): Regional økonomi og politikk. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• Wiborg, A. (2003): ‘Between mobility and belonging: out‐migrated young students' perspective on rural areas in north Norway’, Acta Borealia20 (2): 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Witoszek, N. (1998): Norske naturmytologier: fra Edda til økofilosofi. Pax, Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. (2005): Contesting Rurality: Politics in the British Countryside. Ashgate, Aldershot .
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, H.W‐C. (1998): ‘Capital, state and space: contesting the borderless world’, Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS 23 (3): 291–309.
   Google Scholar