23
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Embedded and disembedded practice in the firm–place nexus: a study of two world‐leading manufacturers of ski equipment in the lillehammer ski cluster

&
Pages 177-194 | Published online: 10 Nov 2016

References

  • Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004): Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities. Oxford University Press, Oxford .
  • Arthur, W. B. (1989): ‘Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock‐in by historical events’, Economic Journal99 (394): 116–133.
  • Atherton, A. and Johnston, A. (2008): ‘Cluster formation from the “bottom‐up”: a process perspective’, In Karlsson, C. (ed.): Handbook of Research on Cluster Theory. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham , pp.93–113.
  • Bartov, E.,Givoly, D. and Hayn, C. (2002): ‘The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations’, Journal of Accounting and Economics33 (2): 173–204.
  • Bathelt, H. and Glückler, J. (2005): ‘Resources in economic geography: from substantive concepts towards a relational perspective’, Environment and Planning A37 (9): 1545–1563.
  • Boschma, R. A. and Frenken, K. (2006): ‘Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography’, Journal of Economic Geography6 (3): 273–302.
  • Boschma, R. A. and Martin, R. (2007): ‘Editorial: constructing an evolutionary economic geography’, Journal of Economic Geography7 (5): 537–548.
  • Brusco, S.,Cainelli, G.,Forni, F.,Franchi, M.,Malusardi, A. and Righetti, R. (1996): ‘The evolution of industrial districts in Emilia‐Romagna’, In Cossentino, F.,Pyke, F. and Sengenberger, W. (eds): Local Regional Response to Global Pressure: The Case of Italy and its Industrial Districts. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva , pp.17–66.
  • Damasio, A. R. (2006): Descartes' Error. Vintage, London .
  • David, P. A. (2001): ‘Path dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics”’, In Garrouste, P. and Ioannides, S. (eds): Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham , pp.15–40.
  • Diamond, J. (1997): Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. Norton, New York .
  • Dicken, P. (2011): Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy. 6th edn.Sage, London .
  • Dicken, P. and Malmberg, A. (2001): ‘Firms in territories: a relational perspective’, Economic Geography77 (4): 345–363.
  • Ebersberger, B. and Herstad, S. J. (2012): ‘Go abroad or have strangers visit? On organizational search spaces and local linkages’, Journal of Economic Geography12 (1): 273–295.
  • Essletzbichler, J. and Rigby, D. L. (2007): ‘Exploring evolutionary economic geographies’, Journal of Economic Geography7 (5): 549–571.
  • Fagerberg, J. (2003): ‘Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics13 (2): 125–159.
  • Figueiredo, O.,Guimarães, P. and Woodward, D. (2002): ‘Home‐field advantage: location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs’, Journal of Urban Economics52 (2): 341–361.
  • Fløysand, A. and Jakobsen, S.‐E. (2007): ‘Commodification of rural places: a narrative of social fields, rural development, and football’, Journal of Rural Studies23 (2): 206–221.
  • Fløysand, A. and Jakobsen, S.‐E. (2011): ‘The complexity of innovation: a relational turn’, Progress in Human Geography35 (3): 328–344.
  • George, A. L. and Bennett, A. (2005): Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • Gertler, M. S. (1997): ‘The invention of regional culture’, In Lee, R. and Wills, J. (eds): Geographies of Economies. Arnold, London , pp.47–58.
  • Gertler, M. S. (2010): ‘Rules of the game: the place of institutions in regional economic change’, Regional Studies44 (1): 1–15.
  • Gomm, R.,Hammersley, M. and Foster, P. (2000: ‘Case study and generalization’, In Gomm, R.,Hammersley, M. and Foster, P. (eds): Case Study Method. Sage, London , pp.98–115.
  • Gotaas, T. (2008): Skimakerne. Historien om norske ski. Gyldendal, Oslo .
  • Granovetter, M. (1985): ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology91 (3): 481–510.
  • Hagström, P. (1990): ‘Unshackling corporate geography’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography72 (1): 3–12.
  • Harrison, B. (1992): ‘Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles?’, Regional Studies26 (5): 469–483.
  • Hayter, R. (2004): ‘Economic geography as dissenting institutionalism: the embeddedness, evolution and differentiation of regions’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography86 (2): 95–115.
  • Hess, M. (2004): ‘“Spatial” relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness’, Progress in Human Geography28 (2): 165–186.
  • Hodgson, G. M. (1992): ‘The reconstruction of economics: is there still a place for neoclassical theory?’, Journal of Economic Issues26 (3): 749–767.
  • Hodgson, G. M. (1993): Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics. Polity, Cambridge .
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2006): ‘What are institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues40 (1): 1–25.
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2009): ‘Agency, institutions, and Darwinism in evolutionary economic geography’, Economic Geography85 (2): 167–173.
  • Jessop, B. and Oosterlynck, S. (2008): ‘Cultural political economy: on making the cultural turn without falling into soft economic sociology’, Geoforum39 (3): 1155–1169.
  • Kasper, W. and Streit, M. E. (1998): Institutional Economics: Social Order and Public Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham .
  • Krugman, P. (1991): ‘Increasing returns and economic geography’, Journal of Political Economy99 (3): 483–499.
  • Lam, A. (2000): ‘Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework’, Organization Studies21 (3): 487–513.
  • Lovering, J. (1999): ‘Theory led by policy: the inadequacies of the “New Regionalism” (illustrated from the case of Wales)’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23 (2): 379–395.
  • Mackinnon, D.,Cumbers, A. and Chapman, K. (2002): ‘Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates’, Progress in Human Geography26 (3): 293–311.
  • Mackinnon, D.,Cumbers, A.,Pike, A.,Birch, K. and Mcmaster, R. (2009): ‘Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation’, Economic Geography85 (2): 129–150.
  • Macleod, G. (2001): ‘Beyond soft institutionalism: accumulation, regulation, and their geographical fixes’, Environment and Planning A33 (7): 1145–1167.
  • Malmberg, A. and Power, D. (2006): ‘True clusters: a severe case of conceptual headache’, In Asheim, B.,Cooke, P. and Martin, R. (eds): Clusters in Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations. Routledge, London , pp.50–68.
  • Mandelbrot, B. B. and Hudson, R. L. (2008): The (mis) Behaviour of Markets: A Fractal View of Risk, Ruin and Reward. Profile, London .
  • Markusen, A. (1994): ‘Studying regions by studying firms’, Professional Geographer46 (4): 477–490.
  • Markusen, A. (1999): ‘Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies’, Regional Studies33 (9): 869–884.
  • Martin, R. (1999): ‘The new “geographical turn” in economics: some critical reflections’, Cambridge Journal of Economics23 (1): 65–91.
  • Martin, R. (2010): ‘Roepke lecture in economic geography – Rethinking regional path dependence: beyond lock‐in to evolution’, Economic Geography86 (1): 1–27.
  • Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (2003): ‘Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?’, Journal of Economic Geography3 (1): 5–35.
  • Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (2006): ‘Path dependence and regional economic evolution’, Journal of Economic Geography6 (4): 395–437.
  • Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (2007): ‘Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography’, Journal of Economic Geography7 (5): 573–601.
  • Maskell, P. (2001): ‘The firm in economic geography’, Economic Geography77 (4): 329–344.
  • Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A. (2007): ‘Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution’, Journal of Economic Geography7 (5): 603–618.
  • Mcnee, R. B. (1958): ‘The functional geography of the firm, with an illustrative case study from the petroleum industry’, Economic Geography34 (4): 321–337.
  • Menzel, M.‐P. and Fornahl, D. (2010): ‘Cluster life cycles – dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution’, Industrial and Corporate Change19 (1): 205–238.
  • Morgan, K. (1997): ‘The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal’, Regional Studies31 (5): 491–503.
  • Narula, R. (2002): ‘Innovation systems and “inertia” in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock‐in’, Research Policy31 (5): 795–816.
  • Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (2002): ‘Evolutionary theorizing in economics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives16 (2): 23–46.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990): Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Ostrom, E. (2005): Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Ostrom, E.,Burger, J.,Field, C. B.,Norgaard, R. B. and Policansky, D. (1999): ‘Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges’, Science NS284 (5412): 278–282.
  • Pagano, U. (2007): ‘Bounded rationality and institutionalism’, In Hodgson, G. M. (ed.): The Evolution of Economic Institutions: A Critical Reader. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham , pp.19–33.
  • Polanyi, K. (1944): The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon, Boston , MA .
  • Porter, M. E. (1998): ‘Clusters and competition: new agendas for companies, government, and institutions’, inPORTER, M. E.: On Competition. Harvard Business Review, Boston , MA , pp.197–287.
  • Porter, M. E. (2000): ‘Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy’, Economic Development Quarterly14 (1): 15–34.
  • Pred, A. R. (1967): Behavior and Location: Foundations for a Geographic and Dynamic Location Theory, Part I. Lund Studies in Geography: Series B. Human Geography 27, Gleerup, Lund University, Lund .
  • PROFF (n.d.): Proff – the business finder [company web site]. URLhttp://www.proff.no/ [accessed on 26 April 2012].
  • Rafiqui, P. S. (2009): ‘Evolving economic landscapes: why new institutional economics matters for economic geography’, Journal of Economic Geography9 (3): 329–353.
  • Rothbard, M. N. (1962): Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles. Van Nostrand, New York .
  • Rusten, G. and Bryson, J. R. (2010): ‘Placing and spacing services: towards a balanced economic geography of firms, clusters, social networks, contracts and the geographies of enterprise’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Social Geografie101 (3): 248–261.
  • Schoenberger, E. (1991): ‘The corporate interview as a research method in economic geography’, Professional Geographer44 (2): 180–189.
  • Searle, J. R. (2010): Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press, Oxford .
  • Smith, A. (1759): The Theory of Moral Sentiments. A. Millar, London .
  • Stafford, H. A. and Watts, H. D. (1990): ‘Abandoned products, abandoned places: plant closures in multi‐product and multi‐locational firms in urban areas’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Social Geografie81 (3): 162–169.
  • Storper, M. (1997): The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. Guilford, New York .
  • Sunley, P. (2008): ‘Relational economic geography: a partial understanding or a new paradigm?’, Economic Geography84 (1): 1–26.
  • Taleb, N. N. (2007): The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House, New York .
  • Taylor, M. and Asheim, B. (2001): ‘The concept of the firm in economic geography’, Economic Geography77 (4): 315–328.
  • Taylor, M. and Oinas, P. (2006): Understanding the Firm: Spatial and Organizational Dimensions. Oxford University Press, Oxford .
  • Van Der PLOEG, J. D. (2008): The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization. Earthscan, London .
  • Veblen, T. (1898): ‘Why is economics not an evolutionary science?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics12 (4): 373–397.
  • von mises, L. (1949): Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Yale University Press, New Haven , CT .
  • Yin, R. K. (2009): Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th edn.Sage, Los Angeles , CA .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.