4
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Postmodern Thought in Symbolic Interaction: Reconstructing Social Inquiry in Light of Late-Modern Concerns

&
Pages 391-411 | Published online: 12 Dec 2016

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Negative Dialectics. New York: Continuum.
  • Alexander, Jeffrey 1978. “Formal and Substantive Volunteerism in the Work of Talcott Parsons: A Theoretical and Ideological Perspective”. American Sociological Review 43: 177–198.
  • Baudrillard, Jean 1983. In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities or the End of the Social. New York: Baudrillard and Semiotext.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt 1988. “Is There A Postmodern Sociology Theory, Culture and Society 5: 217–237.
  • Becker, Howard S. 1964. The Other Side: Perspectives on Deviance. New York: Free Press.
  • Becker, Howard S. 1967. “Whose Side Are We On Social Problems 14: 239–247.
  • Becker, Howard S. 1973. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
  • Berman, Marshall 1982. All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Best, Steve and Douglas Kellner 1991. Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Blum, Alan F and Peter McHugh 1971. “The Social Ascription of Motives”. American Sociological Review 36: 98–109.
  • Blumer, Herbert 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Blumer, Herbert 1980. “Comment: Mead and Blumer: The Convergent Methodological Perspectives of Social Behaviorism and Symbolic Interactionism”. American Sociological Review 45: 409–419.
  • Buban, Steven 1986. “Studying Social Processes: The Chicago and Iowa Schools Revisited”. Pp. 25–40 in Studies in Symbolic Interaction: The Iowa School, edited by Carl J. Couch, Stanley L. Saxton, and Michael A. Katovich Greenwich, CT: JAI..
  • Burawoy, Michael 1990. “Marxism as Science: Historical Challenges and Theoretical Growth”. American Sociological Review 55: 775–793.
  • Camic, Charles 1989. “Structure After 50 Years: The Anatomy of a Charter”. American Journal of Sociology 95: 38–107.
  • Carey, James W. 1989. Communication as Culture. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
  • Cohen, Jere, Lawrence Hazelrigg, and Whitney Pope 1975. “Reply to Parsons”. American Sociological Review 40: 670–673.
  • Collins, Randall 1981. “The Microfoundations of Macro Sociology”. American Journal of Sociology 85: 984–1014.
  • Couch, Carl J. 1984. “Symbolic Interaction and Generic Sociological Principles”. Symbolic Interaction 7: 1–13.
  • Couch, Carl J. 1987. “Objectivity: A Crutch and Club for Bureaucrats/Subjectivity: A Haven for Lost Souls”. The Sociological Quarterly 28: 105–118.
  • Couch, Carl J. and Robert Hintz, eds. 1975. Constructing Social Life. Champaign, IL: Stipes.
  • Couch, Carl J, Stanle. L Saxto., and Michae. A Katovich. 1986. “Introduction”. Pp. xvii–xxv in Studies in Symbolic Interaction: The Iowa School, edited by Carl J. Couch, Stanley L. Saxton, and Michael A. Katovich Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Davis, Fred 1964. “Deviance Disavowal: The Management of Strained Interaction by the Visibly Handicapped”. Pp. 119–37 in The Other Side, edited by Howard S. Becker New York: Free Press.
  • Davis, Murray S. 1983. Smut: Erotic Reality/Obscene Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Day, Rober and Jo Anne Day 1977. “A Review of the Current State of Negotiated Order Theory”. Sociological Quarterly 19: 126–142.
  • Denzin, Norman K. 1977. “Notes on the Criminogenic Hypothesis: A Case Study of the American Liquor Industry”. American Sociological Review 42: 905–920.
  • Denzin, Norman K. 1986. “Postmodern Social Theory”. Sociological Theory 4: 194–204.
  • Denzin, Norman K. 1987. The Recovering Alcoholic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Denzin, Norman K. 1989. “Reading Tender Mercies: Two Interpretations”. Sociological Quarterly 30: 37–57.
  • Denzin, Norman K. 1990. “Presidential Address on The Sociological Imagination Revisited”. Sociological Quarterly 31: 1–22.
  • Denzin, Norman K. 1992. Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies: The Politics of Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Derrida, Jacques 1972. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences”. Pp. 247–264 in The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, edited by R. Macksey and E. Donato. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
  • Emerson, Joan 1970. “Nothing Unusual is Happening”. Pp. 208–222 in Human Nature and Collective Behavior: Papers in Honor of Herbert Blumer, edited by Tomatsu Shibutani Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Erikson, Kai T. 1962. “Notes on the Sociology of Deviance”. Social Problems 9: 307–314.
  • Farberman, Harvey 1975. “A Criminogenic Market Structure: The Automobile Industry”. Sociological Quarterly 16: 438–457.
  • Farberman, Harvey 1991. “Symbolic Interactionism and Postmodernism: Close Encounters of a Dubious Kind”. Symbolic Interaction 14: 471–488.
  • Fine, Gary Alan 1990. “Symbolic Interactionism in the Post Blumerian Age”. Pp. 117–157 in Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Synthesis, edited by George Ritzer New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Foote, Nelson 1951. “Identification as a basis for a Theory of Motivation”. American Sociological Review 46: 14–21.
  • Foucault, Michel 1977. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage.
  • Freud, Sigmund 1961. Civilization and its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Fromm, Erich 1941. Escape From Freedom. New York: Avon.
  • Gamson, William 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
  • Garfinkel, Harold 1956. “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies”. American Journal of Sociology 61: 420–424.
  • Gibbs, Jack P. 1966. “Conceptions of Deviant Behavior: The Old and the New”. Pacific Sociological Review 9: 9–14.
  • Glaser, Barney G and Ansel. L Strauss. 1964. “Awareness Contexts and Social Interaction”. American Sociological Review 29: 669–679.
  • Goffman, Erving 1959. Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.
  • Goffman, Erving 1961a. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Goffman, Erving 1961b. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City. NY: Doubleday.
  • Goffman, Erving 1963a. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
  • Goffman, Erving 1963b. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Goffman, Erving 1967. Interaction Ritual. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Goffman, Erving 1969. Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Goffman, Erving 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic.
  • Goffman, Erving 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Goffman, Erving 1983. “The Interaction Order”. American Sociological Review 48: 1–17.
  • Gonos, George 1977. “‘Situation’ Versus ‘Frame’: The ‘Interactionist’ and the ‘Structuralist’ Analyses of Everyday Life. American Sociological Review 42: 854–867.
  • Gross, Edwar and Gregor. P Stone. 1964. “Embarrassment and the Analysis of Role Requirements”. American Journal of Sociology 70: 1–15.
  • Habermas, Jurgen 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Hagan, John 1973. “Labelling and Deviance: A Case Study in the Sociology of the Interesting”. Social Problems 20: 447–458.
  • Hall, Peter 1987. “Interactionism and the Study of Social Organization”. Sociological Quarterly 28: 1–22.
  • Harvey, David 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwood.
  • Horkheimer, Max 1974. Eclipse of Reason. New York: Seabury.
  • Horkheimer, Ma and Theodo. W Adorno. 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.
  • Hoy, David C. 1989. “Splitting the Difference: Habermas' Critique of Derrida”. Praxis International 8: 447–464.
  • Hughes, Everett C. 1945. “Dilemmas and Contradictions of Status,” American Journal of Sociology 50: 353–359.
  • Jameson, Fredric 1971. Marxism and Form: Twentieth-Century Dialectore Theories of Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Jameson, Fredric 1991. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Joas, Hans 1985. G.H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Katovich, Michael A. 1987. “Identity, Time, and Situated Activity: An Interactionist Analysis of Dyadic Transactions”. Symbolic Interaction 10: 187–208.
  • Katovich, Michael A and Ron Diamond 1987. “Selling Time: Situated Transactions in a Noninstitutional Environment”. Sociological Quarterly 27: 253–271.
  • Katovich, Michael A and Charles MacMurray 1991. “Toward a Postmodern Theory of the Past”. Pp. 73–88 in Studies in Symbolic Interaction, edited by Norman Denzin, Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Kaufmann, Walter 1950. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Cleveland, OH: Meridian.
  • Kitsuse, John I. 1964. “Societal Reaction to Deviant Behavior: Problems of Theory and Method”. Pp. 87–102 in The Other Side, edited by Howard S. Becker New York: Free Press.
  • Kitsuse, John I. 1975. “The New Conception of Deviance and Its Critics”. Pp. 273–84 in The Labelling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective, edited by Walter R. Gove New York: Wiley and Sons.
  • Kuhn, Manford 1964a. “Major Trends in Symbolic Interaction Theory in the Past Twenty-five Years”. Sociological Quarterly 5: 61–84.
  • Kuhn, Manford 1964b. “The Reference Group Reconsidered”. Sociological Quarterly 5: 6–21.
  • Lash, Scott 1990. Sociology of Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
  • Lemert, Edwin M. 1951. Social Pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lemert. Edwin M. 1962. “Paranoia and the Dynamics of Exclusion”. Sociometry 25: 2–20.
  • Lemert. Edwin M. 1967. Human Deviance, Social Problems, and Social Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Lemert. Edwin M. 1974. “Beyond Mead: The Societal Reaction to Deviance”. Social Problems 21: 457–468.
  • Lofland, Joh and Rodney Stark 1964. “Becoming a World Saver: A Theory of Conversion to a Deviant Perspective”. American Sociological Review 30: 862–875.
  • Luttfiyya, M. Nawal, and Da. E Miller. 1986. “Disjunctures and the Process of Interpersonal Accounting”. Pp. 131–148 in Studies in Symbolic Interaction: The Iowa School, edited by Carl J. Couch, Stanley L. Saxton, and Michael A. Katovich Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Lyman, Stanford M and Marvi. B Scott. 1970. A Sociology of the Absurd. New York: Meredith.
  • Lyotard, Jean Francois 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Maines, David R. 1977. “Social Organization and Social Structure in Symbolic Interactionist Thought”. Annual Review of Sociology 3: 235–259.
  • Maines, David R. 1981. “Recent Developments in Symbolic Interactionism”. Pp. 461–86 in Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction, edited by Gregory P. Stone and Harvey A. Farberman. New York: MacMillan.
  • Maines, David R. 1982. “In Search of Mesostructure: Studies in the Negotiated Order”. Urban Life 11: 267–279.
  • Maines, David R, Noreen Sugru and Michae. A Katovich. 1983. “The Sociological Import of George Herbert Mead's Theory of the Past”. American Sociological Review 48: 161–173.
  • Marcuse, Herbert 1974. One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • McHugh, Peter 1970. “A Common-Sense Conception of Deviance”. Pp. 61–88 in Deviance and Respectability: The Social Construction of Moral Meanings, edited by Jack D. Douglas New York: Basic.
  • McPhail, Clark 1989. “Meadian vs. Neo-Meadian Theories of Mind”. Symbolic Interaction 12: 43–52.
  • McPhail, Clar and Cynthia Rexroat 1979. “Mead vs. Blumer: The Divergent Methodological Perspectives of Social Behaviorism and Symbolic Interactionism”. American Sociological Review 44: 449–467.
  • McPhail, Clar and Cynthia Rexroat 1980. “Ex Cathedra Blumer or Ex Libris Mead American Sociological Review 45: 420–430.
  • Mead, George Herbert 1932. The Philosophy of the Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mead, George Herbert 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mead, George Herbert 1938. The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mead, George Herbert 1964. Selected Writings, edited by Andrew J. Reck, New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Meltzer, Bernar and John Petras 1970. “The Chicago and Iowa Schools of Symbolic Interactionism”. Pp. 3–17 in Human Nature and Collective Behavior, edited by Tomatsu Shibutani Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Meltzer, Bernard N, Joh. W Petra. and Larr. T Reynolds. 1975. Symbolic Interactionism: Genesis, Varieties, and Criticism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Merton, Robert 1975. “Structural Analysis in Sociology”. Pp. 21–52 in Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, edited by Peter Blau. New York: The Free Press.
  • Merton, Robert 1976. Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: Free Press.
  • Mestrovic, Stjepan 1991. The Coming Fin de Siècle: An Application of Durkheim's Sociology to Modernity and Postmodernity. New York: Routledge.
  • Meyrowitz, Joshua 1985. No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, Dan E, R. Hintz and Car. J Couch. 1975. “The Elements and Structure of Openings”. The Sociological Quarterly 16: 479–499.
  • Mills. C Wright. 1940. “Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive”. American Sociological Review 5: 904–913.
  • Mills. C Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mullins, Nicholas 1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Society. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Musolf, Gil Richard 1992. “Structures, Institutions, Power, and Ideology: New Directions Within Symbolic Interactionism”. Sociological Quarterly 33: 171–189.
  • Nietzsche, Friedrich 1966. Beyond Good and Evil. New York: Random House.
  • O'Toole, Robert and R. Dubin. 1968. “Baby Feeding and Body Sway: An Experiment in George Herbert Mead's taking the role of the other”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10: 59–65.
  • Parsons, Talcott 1975. “Comment on Cohen, Hazelrigg, and Pope”. American Sociological Review 40: 666–669.
  • Pfohl, Stephen 1990. “Welcome to the PARASITE CAFE: Postmodernity as a Social Problem”. Social Problems 37: 421–442.
  • Plummer, Ken 1990. “Staying in the Empirical World: Symbolic Interactionism and Postmodernism: A Reply to Denzin”. Symbolic Interaction 13: 155–160.
  • Polsky, Ned 1964. “The Hustler”. Social Problems 12: 3–15.
  • Pope, Whitney, Jere Cohen, and Lawrence Hazelrigg 1975. “On the Divergence ofWeber and Durkheim: A Critique of Parsons' Convergence Thesis”. American Sociological Review 40: 417–427.
  • Reese, William A. 1990. “Proposing Control as Sociology's Central Notion: A Fool's Errand Social Science Quarterly 27: 41–49.
  • Reese, William A, Russel. L Curti., and Albert Richard 1989. “Juvenile Justice as People-Modulating: A Case Study of Progressive Delinquent Dispositions”. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 26: 329–357.
  • Reese, William A and Michae. A Katovich. 1989. “Untimely Acts: Extending the Interactionist Conception of Deviance”. Sociological Quarterly 30: 159–184.
  • Reynolds, Janic and Larry Reynolds 1973. “Interactionism, Complicity, and the Astructural Bias”. Catalyst 7: 76–85.
  • Reynolds, Larry T. 1990. Interactionism: Exposition and Critique, 2nd ed. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
  • Rorty, Richard 1985. “Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity”. Pp. 161–175 in Habermas and Modernity, edited by Richard J. Bernstein. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Rosenhan. David L. 1973. “On Being Sane in Insane Places”. Science 179 (Jan. 19): 250–258.
  • Scheff, Thomas J. 1966. Being Mentally III. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Scheff, Thomas J. 1967. “Toward a Sociological Model of Consensus”. American Sociological Review 32: 32–46.
  • Scheff, Thomas J. 1970. “On the Concepts of Identity and Social Relationship”. Pp. 193–207 in Human Nature and Collective Behavior, edited by Tomatsu Shibutani. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Schur, Edwin M. 1969. “Reactions to Deviance: A Critical Assessment”. American Journal of Sociology 75: 309–322.
  • Schur, Edwin M. 1975. “Comments”. Pp. 285–294 in The Labelling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective, edited by Walter R. Gove New York: Wiley and Sons.
  • Schwartz, Barry 1974. “Waiting, Exchange, and Power: The Distribution of Time in Social Systems”. American Journal of Sociology 79: 841–870.
  • Schwartz, Barry. Yael Zerubavel, and Bernic. M Barnett. 1986. “The Recovery of the Masada: A Study in Collective Memory”. Sociological Quarterly 27: 147–164.
  • Scott, Marvin B and Stanfor. M Lyman. 1968. “Accounts”. American Sociological Review 33: 46–62.
  • Shalin, Dmitri 1988. “G.H. Mead, Socialism, and the Progressive Agenda”. American Journal of Sociology 93: 913–951.
  • Simmel, Georg 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited and translated by Kurt H. Wolff New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Snow, Robert P and Dennis Brissett 1986. “Pauses: Explorations in SocialRythym”. Symbolic Interaction 9: 1–18.
  • Soja, Edward W. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Theory. London: Verso.
  • Stone, Gregory P. 1962. “Appearance and the Self”. Pp. 86–118 in Human Behavior and Social Processes, edited by Arnold M. Rose Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Stone, Gregory P. 1970. “Appearance”. Pp. 101–13 in Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction, 2nd ed.. edited by Gregory P. Stone and Harvey A. Farberman New York: MacMillan.
  • Strauss, Anselm 1959. Mirrors and Masks. New York: The Free Press.
  • Strauss, Anselm 1962. “Transformations of Identity”. Pp. 63–85 in Human Behavior and Social Processes, edited by Arnold M. Rose Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Strauss, Anselm 1978. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Strauss, Anselm L, L. Schatzman, D. Erlich, R. Bucher, and M. Subshin. 1963. “The Hospital and its Negotiated order”. Pp. 147–169 in The Hospital in Modern Society, edited by Eliot Friedson New York: The Free Press.
  • Stryker, Sheldon 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
  • Swanson, Guy 1961. “Mead and Freud: Their Relevance for Social Psychology”. Sociometry 24: 319–339.
  • Sykes, Gresham M and David Matza 1957. “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency”. American Sociological Review 22: 664–670.
  • Tannenbaum, Frank 1938. Crime and Community. New York: Ginn and Company.
  • Thorsell, Bernard A and Lloy. W Klemke. 1972. “Labeling Process: Reinforcement and Deterrent Law and Society Review 6: 393–403.
  • Turner, Ralph H. 1972. “Deviance Avowal as Neutralization of Commitment”. Social Problems 19: 308–321.
  • Turner, Ralph H. 1976. “The Real Self: From Institution to Impulse”. American Journal of Sociology 81: 989–1016.
  • Wiener, Norbert 1967/1950. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Zerubavel, Eviatar 1977. “The French Republican Calendar: A Case Study in the Sociology of Time”. American Sociological Review 42: 868–877.
  • Zurcher, Louis A. 1970. “The Friendly Poker Game: A Study of an EphemeralRole”. Social Forces 49: 173–186.
  • Zurcher, Louis A. 1977. The Mutable Self. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Zurcher, Louis A. 1986. “The Bureaucratizing of Impulse: Self Conception in the 1980s”. Symbolic Interaction 9: 169–178.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.