85
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Sociology in an Era of Fragmentation: From the Sociology of Knowledge to the Philosophy of Science, and Back Again

&
Pages 111-137 | Published online: 12 Dec 2016

  • Abbott, Andrew. 1997. “Of Time and Space: The Contemporary Relevance of the Chicago School”. Social Forces 75:1149–1182.
  • Adrono, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. [1944] 1986. The Dialectic of the Enlightenment. New York: Continuum.
  • Alford, Robert R., and Roger Friedland. 1985. Powers of Theory. Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Alpert, Harry. 1954. “The National Science Foundation and Social Science Research”. American Sociological Review 19:208–211.
  • Alpert, Harry. 1955. “The Social Sciences and the National Science Foundation”. American Sociological Review 20:653–661.
  • Alpert, Harry. 1957. “The Social Science Research Program of the National Science Foundation”. American Sociological Review 22:582–585.
  • Althusser, Louis, and Etienne Balibar. [1968] 1979. Reading Capital. London: Verso.
  • Archer, Margaret. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Archer, Margaret, Tony Lawson, and Roy Bhaskar, eds. 1998. Critical Realism, Essential Readings. London: Routledge.
  • Bachelard, Gaston. 1947. La formation de l'esprit scientifique. Contribution à la psychanalyse de la connaisance objective. Paris: J. Vrin.
  • Bannister, Robert C. 1987. Sociology and Scientism. The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1975. “Feyerabend and Bachelard: Two Philosophies of Science”. New Left Review (94) (Nov.-Dec.): 31–55.
  • Bhaskar, Roy. [1975] 1997. A Realist Theory of Science. New York: Verso.
  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. New York: Humanities Press.
  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1986. Scientific Realism and Huaman Emancipation. London: Verso.
  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1989. Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London: Verso.
  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1994. Plato Etcetera: The Problems of Philosophy and Their Resolution. New York: Verso.
  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1998. “General Introduction.” pp. ix–xxiv in Critical Realism, Essential Readings, edited by Margaret Archer, Tony Lawson, and Roy Bhaskar. London: Routledge.
  • Black, Max. ed. 1961. The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons. A Critical Examination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bloom, Harold. 1973. The Anxicty of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Boudon, Raymond. 1971. La crise de la sociologie. Genève: Droz.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1981. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field.” pp. 257–292 in French Sociology: Rupture and Renewal Since 1968, edited by Charles C. Lemert. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1985. “The Genesis of the Concepts of Habitus and Field. Sociocriticism 2(2): 11–24.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 19881989. “Vive la Crise! For Heterodoxy in Social Science”. Theory and Society 17:773–787.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Éditions RAISONS D'AGIR.
  • Brenner, Neil. 1998a. “Between Fixity and Motion: Accumulation, Territorial Organization and the Historical Geography of Spatial Scales”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16:459–481.
  • Brenner, Neil. 1998b. “Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe”. Review of International Political Economy 5 (Spring): 1–37.
  • Brenner, Neil. 1999. “Global Cities, Glocal States: State-Scaling and the Making of Urban Governance in the European Union.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
  • Breslau, Dan. 2001. “Abstracting the Economy: Mathematics and Statistics in U.S. Economics.” Paper presented at University of Michigan, Sociology Department.
  • Bryant, Christopher. 1975. “Positivism Reconsidered”. Sociological Review 23:397–412.
  • Bryant, Christopher. 1985. Positivism in Social Theory and Research. New York: Macmillan.
  • Bryant, Christopher. 1989. “Le positivisme instrumental dans la sociologie américaine”. Actes de la recherche 78:64–74.
  • Carnap, Rudolph. [1928] 1970. The Logical Structure of the World. Berkeley. University of California Press.
  • Castells, Manuel. 1989. The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Chae, Ou-Byung. 2000. “History and Two Realisms: Theoretical versus Critical.” Unpublished paper.
  • Chriss, James J. 1995. “Testing Gouldner's Coming Crisis Thesis: On the Waxing and Waning of Intellectual Influence”. Current Perspectives in Social Theory 15:3–61.
  • Chriss, James J. 1999. Alvin W. Gouldner: Sociologist and Outlaw Marxist. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Cohn-Bendit, Daniel, Jean-Peirre Duteuil, Bertrand Gérard, and Bernard Granautier. 1969. “Why Sociologists?” pp. 373–378 in Student Power, edited by A. Cookburn and R. Blackburn. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Cole, Stephen. 2001a. “Introduction: The Social Construction of Sociology.” pp. 7–36 in What's Wrong with Sociology, edited by Stephen Cole. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Cole, Stephen. 2001b. What's Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Coleman, James S. 1992. “The Power of Social Norms”. Duke Dialogue. Faculty Newsletter 3:1–8.
  • Collier, Andrew. 1994. Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy. New York: Verso.
  • Davis, Kingsley. 1960. “The Myth of Functional Analysis as a Special Method in Sociology and Anthropology”. American Sociological Review 36:321–326.
  • Donzelot, Jacques. 1984. L'invention du social. Paris: Fayard.
  • Feyerabend, Paul. [1975] 1988. Against Method. Second edition. London: Verso.
  • Flacks, Richard. 1989. “Gouldner's Prophetic Voice”. American Sociologist 20:353–356.
  • Foucault, Michel. [1966] 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.
  • Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Friedrichs, Robert W. 1970. A Sociology of Sociology. New York: Free Press.
  • Fuchs, Stephan. 1992. The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Fuhrmann, Ellsworth. 1984. “Alvin Gouldner and the Sociology of Knowledge: Three Significant Problem Shifts”. The Sociological Quarterly 25:287–300.
  • Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar, ed. 2001. Alternative Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Gartrell, C. David, and John W. Gartrell. 1996. “Positivism in Sociological Practice: 1967–1990”. Canadian Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 33:143–158.
  • Gedicks, Al. 1975. “American Social Scientists and the Emerging Corporate Economy: 1885–1915”. The Insurgent Sociologist 5:25–48.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1962. “Anti-Minotaur: The Myth of a Value-Free Sociology”. Social Problems 9:199–213.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1965. Enter Plato: Classical Greece and the Origins of Social Theory. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1968. “The Sociologist as Partisan: Sociology and the Welfare State”. American Sociologist 3:103–116.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology London: Heinemann.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1973. “For Sociology: ‘Varieties of Political Expression’ Revisited”. American Journal of Sociology 78:1063–1093.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1975. The Dark Side of the Dialectic: Toward a New Objectivity. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1976. The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology: The Origins, Grammar, and Future of Ideology. New York: Seabury Press.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1980. The Two Marxisms: Contradictions and Anomalies in the Development of Theory. New York: Seabury Press.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1985. Against Fragmentation: The Origins of Marxism and the Sociology of Intellectuals. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hagan, Robert A., and Ted R. Vaughan. 1989. “The Legacy of The Coming Crisis: Gouldner's Contribution to Social Theory. American Sociologist 20:373–80.
  • Hardt, Michael. 2001. “Comments for Michigan Anthropology and History Colloquium.” Paper presented at University of Michigan Anthropology and History Colloquium, “States of Emergency.”.
  • Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • Hempel, Carl Gustav. 1966. “Explanation in Science and History.” pp. 95–126 in Philosophical Analysis and History, edited by William H. Dray. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Herpin, Nicolas. 1973. Les sociologues américains et le siècle. Paris: PUF.
  • Hirsch, Joachim and Roland Roth. 1986. Das neue Gesicht des Kapitalismus. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.
  • Holmwood, John. 1996. “Abject Theory”. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 32:86–108.
  • Horkheimer, Max. 1995. “Traditional and Critical Theory.” pp. 188–243 in Critical Theory. New York: Continuum.
  • Horowitz, Irving Louis. 1993. The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hume, David. [1748] 1975. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Jacobsen, Kurt. 2001. “Political Scientists Have Turned Guerillas in an Attempt to Shake Off the Stranglehold of the Dogmatic, Unworldly Theory That Dominates Their Discipline”. Guardian April 3, p. 12.
  • Jameson, Fredric. 1998. “Globalization as a Philosophic Issue.” pp. 54–77 in The Cultures of Globalization. edited by Fredric Jameson and Masao Miyoshi. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Jameson, Fredric and Masao Miyoshi, eds. 1998. The Cultures of Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Jessop, Bob. 1989. “Conservative Regimes and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Cases of Great Britain and West Germany.” pp. 261–299 in Capitalist Development and Crisis Theory: Accumulation, Regulation and Spatial Restructuring, edited by M Gottdiener and Nicos Komninos. London: Macmillan.
  • Jessop, Bob. 1990. “Regulation Theories in Retrospect and Prospect”. Economy and Society 19:153–216.
  • Jessop, Bob. 1999. “Narrating the Future of the National Economy and the National State? Remarks on Re-Mapping Regulation and Re-Inventing Governance.” pp. 378–405 in State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn, edited by George Steinmetz. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Jessop, Bob. 2001. Developments and Extensions: Regulation Theory and the Crisis of Capitalism, vol. 5. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 1995. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Kolakowski, Leszek. [1966] 1968. The Alienation of Reason. A History of Positivist Thought. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Kracauer, Siegfried. 1995. “The Crisis of Science. On the Foundational Writings of Max Weber and Ernst Troeltsch.” pp. 213–223 in The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays, edited by Thomas Y. Levin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Kuhn, Thomas. [1962] 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ladner, Joyce A. 1973. The Death of White Sociology. New York: Random House.
  • Levesque-Lopman, Louise. 1989. “Seeing Our Seeing: Gouldner's Reflexive Sociology from a Feminist Phenomenological Perspective”. The American Sociologist 20:362–372.
  • Lipietz, Alain. 1984. L'audace ou l'enlisement. Sur les politiques économiques de la gauche. Paris: Editions la découverte.
  • Lipietz, Alain. 1991. “Die Beziehungen zwischen Kapital und Arbeit am Vorabend des 21. Jahrhunderts”. Leviathan 19:78–101.
  • Lipset, Seymour Martin. 2001. “The State of American Sociology.” pp. 247–270 in What's Wrong with Sociology, edited by Stephen Cole. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Everett Carl Ladd Jr. 1972. “The Politics of American Sociologists”. American Journal of Sociology 78:67–104.
  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1989. Ecological Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lundberg, George A. 1939. Foundations of Sociology. New York: Macmillan.
  • Lyotard, Jean-François. [1979] 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mannheim, Karl. 1929. Idcologie und Utopie. Bonn: Verlag Friedrich Cohen.
  • Merton, Robert K. 1968. “Sociological Theories of the Middle Range.” pp. 39–72 in Social Theory and Social Structure, edited by Robert K. Merton. New York: Free Press.
  • Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mosse, George L. 1964. The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.
  • Nagel, Ernest. [1961] 1979. The Structure of Scientific Explanation. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
  • Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.
  • Parsons, Talcott. [1937] 1968. The Structure of Social Action. 2 vols. New York: Free Press.
  • Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge. Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Popper, Karl R. [1934] 1992. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
  • Rammstedt, Otthein. 1988. “Wertfreiheit und die Konstitution der Soziologie in Deutschland”. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 17(4): 264–271.
  • Rhoads, John K. 1972. “On Gouldner's Crisis of Western Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 78:136–154.
  • Ross, Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sayer, Andrew. 1992. Method in Social Sciences. A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
  • Schwendinger, Herman, and Julia R. Schwendinger. 1974. The Sociologists of the Chair. New York: Basic Books.
  • Sellars, Roy Wood. 1916. Critical Realism. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Sismondo, Sergio. 1996. Science without Myth. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Smelser, Neil J. 1986. “Die Beharrlichkeit des Positivismus in der amerikanischen Soziologie”. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 38:133–150.
  • Smith, Laurence D. 1986. Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassessment of the Alliance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Smith, Laurence D., and William R. Woodward. 1996. B. F. Skinner and Behaviorism in American Culture. Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press.
  • Solow, Robert. 2001. “L'économie entre empirisme et mathématisation”. Le Monde January 3 (online version).
  • Somers, Margaret R. 1998. “‘We're No Angels': Realism, Rational Choice, and Relationality in Social Science. American Journal of Sociology 104:722–784.
  • Steinmetz, George. 1993. Regulating the Social: The Welfare State and Local Politics in Imperial Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Steinmetz, George. 1997a. “German Exceptionalism and the Origins of Nazism: The Career of a Concept.” pp. 251–284 in Stalinism and Nazism. Dictatorships in Comparison, edited by Ian Kershaw and Moshe Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Steinmetz, George. 1997b. “Social Class and the Reemergence of the Radical Right in Contemporary Germany.” pp. 335–368 in Reworking Class: Cultures and Institutions of Economic Stratification and Agency, edited by John R. Hall. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Steinmetz, George. 1998. “Critical Realism and Historical Sociology”. Comparative Studies in Society and History 39(4): 170–86.
  • Steinmetz, George. 2001. “‘States of Emergency’ after September 11th: The End of History or a New Phase of Capitalist Regulation?” Paper presented at University of Michigan Anthropology and History Colloquium, “States of Emergency.”.
  • Steinmetz, George. 2002. “The Uses of Comparison: Latent Positivism, Incommensurability, and Critical Realism.” Paper Presented at Conference on “Problems of Comparability, New York University”.
  • Steinmetz, George. forthcoming. “From the Cold War to the ‘Science Wars’: American Sociology and the Transition to Postfordism.” In The Epistemological Unconscious: Politics of Method in the Social Sciences, edited by George Steinmetz. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Stern, Fritz. 1961. The Politics of Cultural Despair. A Study in the Rise of the Germanic Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Therborn, Göran. 1976. Science, Class and Society. On the Formation of Sociology and Historical Materialism. London: New Left Books.
  • Turner, Jonathan H. 1974. The Structure of Sociological Theory. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
  • Turner, Stephen Park, and Jonathan H. Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Varela, Charles. 1994. “Pocock, Williams, Gouldner: Initial Reactions of Three Social Scientists to the Problem of Objectivity”. Journal for the Study of Human Movement 8:43–64.
  • Weiß, Johannes. 1995. “Negative Soziologie”. Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften 6:241–246.
  • Wernick, Andrew. 1991. Promotional Culture: Advertising, Ideology, and Symbolic Expression. London: Sage.
  • Wieviorka, Michel. 1996. “La sociologie sous tension”. Cahiers internationaux de sociologie 101:319–332.
  • Will, David. 1984. “The Progeny of Positivism: The Maudsley School and Anti-Psychiatry”. British Journal of Psychotherapy 1:50–67.
  • Williams, Raymond. 1961. The Long Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.