You've Won, Now What? The Influence of Legal Change on Gay and Lesbian Mobilization, 1974–1999

REFERENCES

• Adam, Barry D. 1995. The Rise of a Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement. Rev. ed. New York: Twayne Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Amenta, Edwin, Bruce G. Carruthers, and Yvonne Zylan. 1992. “A Hero for the Aged? The Townsend Movement, the Political Mediation Model, and U.S. Old-Age Policy, 1934–1950.” American Journal of Sociology 98(2):308–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, Edwin, Kathleen Dunleavy, and Mary Bernstein. 1994. “Stolen Thunder?” Huey Long's ‘Share Our Wealth,’ Political Mediation, and the Second New Deal. American Sociological Review 59(October):678–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, Edwin and Michael P. Young. 1999. “Making An Impact: Conceptual and Methodological Implications of the Collective Goods Criterion.” Pp. 22–41 in How Social Movements Matter, edited by Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, and Charles Tilly. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, Kenneth T. 2001. “Social Movements and Policy Implementation: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and the War on Poverty, 1965–1971.” American Sociological Review 66:71–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Kenneth T. 2004. Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and Its Legacy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Elizabeth. 2002. Forging Gay Identities: Organizing Sexuality in San Francisco, 1950–1994. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banaszak, Lee Ann. 1996. Why Movements Succeed or Fail: Opportunity, Culture, and the Struggle for Women's Suffrage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Vernon L. 2000. “The Decline of a New Christian Right SMO: Opportunity and Constraints.” Review of Religious Research 42(1):19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Nathaniel. 2001. “Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 4:271–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Nathaniel and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” The American Political Science Review 89(3):634–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Mary. 2003. “Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained? Conceptualizing Social Movement ‘Success’ in the Lesbian and Gay Movement.” Sociological Perspectives 46(3):353–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, Martin B., Norman M. Green, Jr., Dale E. Jones, Mac Lynn, and Lou McNeil. 1992. Churches and Chruch Membership in the United States 1990: An Enumeration by Region, State, and County Based on Data Reported by 133 Church Groupings. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, Chris and Judy Wieder. 1998. “Scene of the Crime: Laws against Everything We Want: Marriage, Adoption, and Equal Rights.” The Advocate October 27, p. 36.
   Google Scholar
• Button, James W., Barbara A. Rienzo, and Kenneth D. Wald. 1997. Private Lives, Public Conflicts: Battles over Gay Rights in American Communities. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Button, James W., Barbara A. Rienzo, and Kenneth D. Wald. 2000. “The Politics of Gay Rights at the Local and State Level.” Pp. 269–89 in The Politics of Gay Rights, edited by Craig A. Rimmerman, Kenneth D. Wald, and Clyde Wilcox. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, Patricia A. 2000. Rainbow Rights: The Role of Lawyers and Courts in the Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights Movement. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clendinen, Dudley and Adam Nagourney. 1999. Out for Good: The Struggle to Build a Gay Rights Movement in America. New York: Simon & Shuster.
   Google Scholar
• Costain, Anne N. 1992. Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women's Movement. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D'Emilio, John. 1983. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• D'Emilio, John. 2000. “Cycles of Change, Questions of Strategy: The Gay and Lesbian Movement after Fifty Years.” Pp. 31–53 in The Politics of Gay Rights, edited by Craig A. Rimmerman, Kenneth D. Wald, and Clyde Wilcox. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, Jennifer and Sarah A. Soule. 2001. “The Differential Protection of Minority Groups: The Inclusion of Sexual Orientation, Gender and Disability in State Hate Crime Laws, 1976–1995.” Research in Political Sociology: The Politics of Social Inequality 9:3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1999. Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, John and Chris Bull. 1996. Perfect Enemies: The Religious Right, the Gay Movement, and the Politics of the 1990s. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, William A. [1975] 1990. The Strategy of Social Protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, William A. and David S. Meyer. 1996. “Framing Political Opportunity.” Pp. 275–90 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Polticial Opportunity, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing, edited by Doug McAdam, John McCarthy, and Mayer Zald. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, Marco. 1998. “Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 98:371–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Jeff and James M. Jasper. 1999. “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory.” Sociological Forum 14(1):27–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Frances. 1973–1999. The Gayellow Pages. 3rd–23rd ed. New York: Renaissance House.
   Google Scholar
• Haider-Markel, Donald. 1997. “From Bullhorns to PACS: Lesbian and Gay Politics, Interest Groups, and Policy.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Haider-Markel, Donald. 2000. “Lesbian and Gay Politics in the States: Interest Groups, Electoral Politics, and Policy.” Pp. 290–346 in The Politics of Gay Rights, edited by Craig A. Rimmerman, Kenneth D. Wald, and Clyde Wilcox. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haider-Markel, Donald and Kenneth Meier. 1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of Conflict.” The Journal of Politics 58(2):332–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. Craig. 1983. “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9:527–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Douglas J., Paul R. Picard, and Bernard Quinn. 1974. Churches and Church Membership in the United States 1971: An Enumeration by Region, State, and County. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Dale E., Sherry Doty, Clifford Grammich, James E. Horsch, Richard Houseal, Mac Lynn, John P. Marcum, Kenneth M. Sanchagrin, and Richard A. Taylor. 2002. Religious Congregations and Membership in the United States. Nashville, TN: Glenmary Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, Melinda D. 2003. “Social Movement Policy Success: The Influence of the Gay and Lesbian Movement on the Decriminalization of State Sodomy Laws, 1969–1998.” Mobilization 8:313–34.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, Luke and Nathan J. Kelly. 2005. “Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables.” Political Analysis 14(2):186–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16:57–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambda Legal Education and Defense Fund. 2002a. Summary of States which Prohibit Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation. New York: Lambda Legal.
   Google Scholar
• Lambda Legal Education and Defense Fund. 2002b. State-by-State Sodomy Law Update. New York: Lambda Legal.
   Google Scholar
• Lambda Legal Education and Defense Fund. 2010. “Status of Same-Sex Relationships Nationwide.” Retrieved March 8, 2010. (http://www.lambdalegal.org/publications/articles/nationwide-status-same-sex-relationships.html).
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, Edward O., John H. Gagnon, Robert T. Michael, and Stuart Michaels. 1994. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug. [1982] 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug. 1996. “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” Pp. 23–40 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. 1988. “Social Movements.” Pp. 695–737 in Handbook of Sociology, edited by Neil J. Smelser. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, Holly J., Karen E. Campbell, Ellen M. Granberg, and Christine Mowery. 2001. “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and U.S. Women's Suffrage Movements, 1866–1919.” American Sociological Review 66:49–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82(6):1212–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, Eric. 2002. Making Gay History: The Half-Century Fight for Lesbian and Gay Equal Rights. New York: Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, David S. 2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30:125–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, David S. and Debra C. Minkoff. 2004. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82(4):1456–92.
   Google Scholar
• Minkoff, Debra. 1995. Organizing for Equality: The Evolution of Women's and Racial-Ethnic Organizations in America, 1955–1985. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minkoff, Debra. 1997. “The Sequencing of Social Movements.” American Sociological Review 62:779–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. 1987. “Maryland Sodomy Reform—1987 Legislative Session.” Box 153, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Records 1973–1995, #7301, Human Sexuality Collection, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG). 1982–1996. International Directories of Parent Groups and Contacts. Box 1, Folders 7, 9 and 20; Box 2, Folder 26; Box 3, Folder 8; Box 5, Folder 37; and Box 55. Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) Records, 1992–1995, #7616, Human Sexuality Collection, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG). 1999. Public Referral Directory. Washington, DC: Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays.
   Google Scholar
• Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG). 2009. “Vision, Mission, and Strategic Goals.” Retrieved March 8, 2010. (http://community.pflag.org/Page.aspx?pid=237).
   Google Scholar
• Piven, Frances Fox and Richard A. Cloward. 1977. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, Bernard, Herman Anderson, Martin Bradley, Paul Goetting, and Peggy Shriver. 1982. Churches and Church Membership in the United States 1980: An Enumeration by Region, State, and County Reported by 111 Church Bodies. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Raeburn, Nicole C. 2004. Changing Corporate America from Inside Out: Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayside, David. 1998. On the Fringe: Gays and Lesbians in Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmerman, Craig A. 2002. From Identity to Politics: The Lesbian and Gay Movements in the United States. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soule, Sarah. 2004. “Going to the Chapel? Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the United States, 1973–2000.” Social Problems 51(4):453–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soule, Sarah A., and Susan Olzak. 2004. “When Do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment.” American Sociological Review 69(4):473–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1995. “Can Feminist Organizations Be Effective?” Pp. 339–55 in Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement, edited by Myra Marx Ferree and Patricia Yancey Martin. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, Doowon. 2004. “Outcome Framing and Movement Dynamics: Korean White-Collar Unions' Political Mobilization and Interunion Solidarity, 1987–1995.” Mobilization 9(1):17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. [1994] 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 1996. “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” Pp. 41–61 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Council of State Governments. 1972–1998. The Book of the States vs. 19–32. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. 1974–2001. Digest of Education Statistics, 1974–2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Vaid, Urvashi. 1995. Virtual Equality: The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian Liberation. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Meide, Wayne. 2000. Legislating Equality: A Review of Laws Affecting Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered People in the United States. New York: The Policy Institute of the Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Meide, Wayne. 1998. Personal Interview with Urvashi Vaid, Director of the NGLTF Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, Kenneth D., James W. Button, and Barbara A. Rienzo. 1996. “The Politics of Gay Rights in American Communities: Explaining Antidiscrimination Ordinances and Policies.” American Journal of Political Science 40(4):1152–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zald, Mayer N. and Roberta Ash. 1966. “SMOs: Growth, Decay and Change.” Social Forces 44(3):327–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar