294
Views
100
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Examination of observation impacts derived from observing system experiments (OSEs) and adjoint models

&
Pages 179-193 | Received 24 Jul 2008, Accepted 02 Dec 2008, Published online: 15 Dec 2016

References

  • Baker, N. and Daley, R. 2000. Observation and background adjoint sensitivity in the adaptive observation-targeting problem. Quart. J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 126, 1431–1454.
  • English, S., Saunders, R., Candy, B., Forsythe, M. and Collard, A. 2004. Met Office satellite data OSEs. In: Proceedings of Third WMO Workshop on the Impact of Various Observing Systems on Numerical Weather Prediction, Alpbach, Austria, WMO/TD No. 1228, 146–156.
  • Errico, R. M. 2000. Interpretations of the total energy and rotational energy norms applied to determination of singular vectors. Quart. J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 126, 1581–1599.
  • Errico, R. M. 2007. Interpretation of an adjoint-derived observational impact measure. Tellus 59A, 273–276.
  • Gelaro, R., Rosmond, T. E. and Daley, R. 2002. Singular vector calcu-lations with an analysis error variance metric. Mon. Wea. Re v. 130, 1166–1186.
  • Gelaro, R., Zhu, Y. and Errico, R. M. 2007. Examination of various-order adjoint-based approximations of observation impact. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 16, 685–692.
  • Kelly, G., McNally, T., Thepaut, J.-N. and Szyndel, M. 2004. OSEs of all main data types in the ECMWF operation system. In: Proceedings of Third WMO Workshop on the Impact of Various Observing Systems on Numerical Weather Prediction, Alpbach, Austria, WMO/TD No. 1228, 63–94.
  • Langland, R. H. and Baker, N. 2004. Estimation of observation im-pact using the NRL atmospheric variational data assimilation adjoint system. Tellus 56A, 189–201.
  • Le Marshall, J., Jung, J., Derber, J., Chahine, M., Treadon, R. and co-authors. 2006. Improving global analysis and forecasting with AIRS. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 87, 891-894.
  • Lin, S.-J. 2004. A vertically Lagrangian finite-volume dynamical core for global models. Mon. Wea. Re v. 132, 2293–2307.
  • Lord, S., Zapotocny, T. and Jung, J. 2004. Observing system experiments with NCEP’s global forecast system. In: Proceedings of Third WMO Workshop on the Impact of Various Observing Systems on Numerical Weather Prediction, Alpbach, Austria, WMO/TD No. 1228, 56–62.
  • Marseille, G.-J., Stoffelen, A. and Barkmeijer, J. 2008. Sensitivity Ob-serving System Experiment (SOSE)-a new effective NWP-based tool in designing the global observing system. Tellus 60A, 216–233.
  • Orrell, D., Smith, L., Barkmeijer, J. and Palmer, T. N. 2001. Model error in weather forecasting. Nonlinear Processes Geophys. 8, 357–371.
  • Rabier, E, Klinker, E., Courtier, P. and Hollingsworth, A. 1996. Sen-sitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions. Quart. J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 122, 121–150.
  • Reynolds, C. A. and Gelaro, R. 2001. Remarks on Northern Hemisphere forecast error sensitivity from 1996-2000. Mon. Wea. Re v. 129,2145–2153.
  • Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Takacs, L. and co-authors. 2007. The GEOS-5 Data Assimilation System-documentation of versions 5.0.1 and 5.1.0. NASA TM 104606, Tech-nical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation Volume 27.
  • Talagrand, O. 1981. A study of the dynamics of four-dimensional data assimilation. Tellus 33, 43–60.
  • Trémolet, Y. 2008. Computation of observation sensitivity and observa-tion impact in incremental variational data assimilation. Tellus 60A, 964–978.
  • Wu, W., Purser, R. J. and Parrish, D. F. 2002. Three dimensional varia-tional analysis with spatially inhomogeneous covariances. Mon. Wea. Re v. 130, 2905–2916.
  • Žagar, N., Stoffelen, A., Marseille, G.-J., Accadia, C. and Schliissel, P. 2008. Impact assessment of simulated Doppler wind lidars with a multivariate variational assimilation in the tropics. Mon. Wea. Re v. 136, 2443–2460.
  • Zhu, Y. and Gelaro, R. 2008. Observation sensitivity calculations using the adjoint of the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) analysis system. Mon. Wea. Re v. 136, 335–351.