110
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation of a regional climate model using in situ temperature observations over the Balkan Peninsula

, , , , , & show all
Pages 357-370 | Received 02 Apr 2008, Accepted 04 Dec 2008, Published online: 15 Dec 2016

References

  • Alexandersson, H. 1986. A homogeneity test applied to precipitation data. J. Clim., 6, 661–675.
  • Bengtsson, L., Hagemann, S. and Hodges, K. I. 2004a. Can climate trends be computed from reanalysis data?J. Geophys. Res., 109, D11111, doi: 10.1029/2004JD004536.
  • Bengtsson, L., Hodges, K. I. and Hagemann, S. 2004b. Sensitivity of the ERA40 reanalysis to the observing system: determination of the global atmospheric circulation from reduced observations. Tellus 56A, 456–471.
  • Bromwich, D. H. and Fogt, R. L. 2004. Strong trends in the skill of the ERA-40 and NCEP—NCAR reanalyses in the high and midlatitudes of the Southern Hemisphere, 1958-2001. J. Clim., 17, 4603–4619.
  • Christensen, J. H., Machenhauer, B., Jones, R. G., Schär, C., Ruti, P. and co-authors. 1997. Validation of present-day regional climate simulations over Europe: LAM simulations with observed boundary conditions. Clim. Dyn. 13, 489-506.
  • Decharme, B. and Douville, H., 2007. Global validation of the ISBA sub-grid hydrology.Clim. Dyn., 29, 21–37, doi: 10.1007/s00382-006-0216-7.
  • Déqué, M. 2007. Frequency of precipitation and temperature extremes over France in an anthropogenic scenario: model results and statistical correction according to observed values. Glob. Planet. Change, 57, 16–26.
  • Déqué, M. and Somot, S. 2007. Variable resolution versus limited area modelling: perfect model approach. In: Research Activities in Atmo-spheric and Oceanic Modelling Report No.37. April 2007, 3.03-3.04, CAS/JSC Working Group on Numerical Experimentation. Avail-able online at: http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/science/wgne/index. html.
  • Déqué, M. Jones, R. G., Wild, M., Giorgi, F., Christensen, J. H. and co-authors. 2005. Global high resolution versus Limited Area Model climate change projections over Europe: quantifying confidence level from PRUDENCE results. Clim. Dyn. 25, 653-670.
  • Douville, H., Planton, S., Royer, J. F., Stephenson, D. B., Tyteca, S. and co-authors. 2000. The importance of vegetation feedbacks in doubled-CO2 time-slice experiments. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14841-14861.
  • Giorgi, E, Bi, X. and Pal, J. S. 2004. Mean interannual variability and trends in a regional climate change experiment over Europe, I: present-day climate (1961-1990). Clim. Dyn. 22, 733–756.
  • Good, P., Giannalcopoulos, C., Flocas, H., Tolika, K., Anagnostopoulou, C. and co-authors. 2008. Significant changes in the regional climate of the Aegean during 1961-2002. Int. J. Climatol., 28, 1735–1749.
  • Hertzog, A., Basdevant, C. and Vial, E 2006. An assessment of ECMWF and NCEP-NCAR Reanalyses in the southern hemisphere at the end of the presatellite era: results from the EOLE experiment (1971-72). Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 3367–3383.
  • Jacob, D., Bärring, L., Christensen, J. B., Christensen, J. H. and co-authors. 2007. An inter-comparison of regional climate models for Europe: model performance in Present-Day Climate.Clim. Change, 81, 31–52, doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9213-4.
  • Jones, P. D. 1999. The instrumental data record: its accuracy and use in attempts to identify the ‘CO2 signal’. In: Analysis of Climate Vari-ability (eds. H. von Storch and A. Navarra). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 53–76.
  • Jones, P. D. and Lister, D. H. 2007. Intercomparison of four different Southern Hemisphere sea level pressure datasets.Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L10704,doi: 10.1029/2007GL029251.
  • Jones, P. D., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Hulme, M., Parker, D. E., and co-authors. 1999. The use of indices to identify changes in climatic extremes.Clim. Change, 42, 131-149.
  • Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D. and co-authors., 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. MeteoroL Soc. 77, 437-471.
  • Kendall, M. and Gibbons, J. D. 1990. Rank Correlation Methods. 5th Edition. Oxford University Press, New York, 260 pp.
  • Kharin, V. V. and Zwiers, E W., 2000. Changes in the extremes in an ensemble of transient climate simulation with a coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM. J. Clim., 13, 3760–3788.
  • Kistler, R., Kalnay, E., Collins, W., Saha, S., White, G. and co-authors. 2001. The NCEP—NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD-ROM and documentation.Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 247-267.
  • Kjellstriim, E., Döscher, R. and Meier, H. E. M. 2005. Atmospheric re-sponse to different sea surface temperatures in the Baltic Sea: coupled versus uncoupled regional climate model experiments.Nord. Hydrol. 36, 397-409.
  • Kostopoulou, E. and Jones, P. D. 20077. Comprehensive analysis of the climate variability in the eastern Mediterranean, part I: map pattern classification.Int. J. Climatol. 27, 1189-1214.
  • Kostopoulou, E. and Jones, P. D. 20077. Comprehensive analysis of the climate variability in the eastern Mediterranean, part IL relation-ships between atmospheric circulation patterns and surface climatic elements.Int. J. Climatol. 27, 1351-1371.
  • López-Moreno, J. I., Goyette, S. and Beniston, M. 2008. Climate change prediction over complex areas: spatial variability of uncertainties and expected changes over the Pyrenees from a set of regional climate models.Int. J. Climatol. 28, 1535-1550.
  • Lucas-Picher, P., Caya, D., de Elia, R. and Laprise, R. 2008. Investigation of regional climate models internal variability with a ten-member ensemble of 10-year simulations over a large domain. Clim. Dyn. 31, 927-940.
  • Moberg, A. and Jones, P. D. 2004. Regional Climate Models simulations of daily maximum and minimum near-surface temperatures across Europe compared with observed station data for 1961-1990. Clim. Dyn. 23, 695–715.
  • Radu, R., Deque, M. and Somot, S. 2008. Spectral nudging in a spectral regional climate model.Tellus 60A, 885–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00343.x.
  • Reid, P. A., Jones, P. D., Brown, J., Goodess, C. M. and Davies, T. D. 2001. Assessments of the reliability of NCEP circulation and relation-ships with surface climate by direct comparisons with station based data.Clim. Res. 17, 247-261.
  • Rusticucci, M. M. and Kousky, E. 2002. A comparative study of max-imum and minimum temperatures over Argentina: NCEP-NCAR re-analysis versus station data. J. Clim. 15, 2089–2101.
  • Seneviratne, S. I., Liithi, D., Litschi, M. and Christoph Schär, C., 2006. Land—atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe. Nature 443, 205-209.
  • Simmons, A. J. and Gibson, J. K. 2000. The ERA-40 Project Plan. In: ERA-40 Project Rep Series 1. ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, United Kingdom,63 pp.
  • Simmons, A. J., Jones, P. D., da Costa Bechtold, V., Beljaars, A. C. M., Milberg, P. W., and co-authors. 2004. Comparison of trends and low-frequency variability in CRU, ERA-40, and NCEP—NCAR analyses of surface air temperature. J. Geophys. Res. 109, D24115,doi: 10.1029/2004JD005306.
  • Somot, S., Sevault, F., Deque, M. and Crepon, M. 2008. 21st cen-tury climate change scenario for the Mediterranean using a coupled atmosphere-ocean regional climate model. Global Planet. Change 61, 112–126, doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.10.003
  • Uppala, S. M., Milberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., da Costa Bechtold, V., and co-authors. 2005. The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quart. J. R. MeteoroL Soc., 131, 2961–3012, doi: 10.1256/qj.04.176.
  • Zhao, T. and FU, C. 2006. Comparison of products from ERA-40, NCEP-2, and CRU with station data for summer precipitation over China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 23, 593–604.