Australian community responses to the use of genetic testing for personalised health promotion

REFERENCES

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldhous, P. (2009). Genome sequencing falls to $5000. New Scientist, 16, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Anderlik, M. R., & Rothstein, M. A. (2001). Privacy and confidentiality of genetic information: What rules for the new science? Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2, 401–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosompra, K., Flynn, B. S., Ashikaga, T., Rairikar, C. J., Worden, J. K., & Solomon, L. J. (2000). Likelihood of undergoing genetic testing for cancer risk: A population‐based study. Preventive Medicine, 30, 155–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, A. (2002). Research methods in health (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Calnan, M., Montaner, D., & Horne, R. (2005). How acceptable are innovative health‐care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 1937–1948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley, C. (2007). Stem cell research: What do the public really think and why? In M. Stranger (Ed.), Human biotechnology and public trust: Trends, perceptions and regulation. Occasional Paper No. 7, Hobart: Centre for Law and Genetics.
   Google Scholar
• Critchley, C. (2008). Public opinion and trust in scientists: The role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 309–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley, C., & Turney, L. (2004). Understanding Australians' perceptions of controversial scientific research. Australian Journal of Emerging Technology in Society, 2, 82–107.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, S., Myers, L. B., & Newman, S. P. (2001). Genetic screening for Alzheimer's disease: What factors predict intentions to take a test? Behavioral Medicine, 27, 101–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, G., Conner, M., & Sheeran, P. (2005). Bridging the intention‐behaviour gap: The role of the moral norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 497–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie, E. A., & Critchley, C. R. (2008). Public perceptions of Australia's doctors, hospitals and health care systems. Medical Journal of Australia, 189, 210–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jallinoja, P., Hakonen, A., Aro, A. R., Niemela, P., Hietala, M., Lonnqvist, J., . . .  Aula, P. (1998). Attitudes towards genetic testing: Analysis of contradictions. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 1367–1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcknight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e‐Commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 334–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, D. M., & Kramer, R. M. (2001). Trust as a form of shallow morality. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 89–117). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, K., Bjork, J., & Berglund, G. (2004). Factors influencing intention to obtain a genetic test for a hereditary disease in an affected group and in the general public. Preventive Medicine, 39, 1107–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'connor, B. V., & Cappelli, M. (1999). Health beliefs and intent to use predictive genetic testing for cystic fibrosis carrier status. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 4, 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Pin, R. R., Critchley, C. R., & Hardie, E. A. (2008). The role of trust in public perception of personalised nutrition: A comparison of Australia and The Netherlands. Paper presented at the International Genomics and Society Conference. Genomics and Society: Setting the Agenda; April 17–18; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Pushkarev, D., Neff, N. F., & Quake, S. R. (2009). Single‐molecule sequencing of an individual human genome. Nature Biotechnology, 27, 847–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronteltap, A., Van trijp, J. C. M., & Renes, R. J. (2009). Consumer acceptance of nutrigenomics‐based personalised nutrition. British Journal of Nutrition, 101, 132–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronteltap, A., Van trijp, J. C. M., Renes, R. J., & Frewer, L. J. (2007). Consumer acceptance of technology‐based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite, 49, 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (1999). A causal model explaining the perception and acceptance of gene technology. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2093–2106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20, 195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skipper, M. (2009). Technology: A step closer to personal genomics? Nature Reviews. Genetics, 10, 661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: Surveying the risk assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19, 689–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & Macgregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniehotta, F. F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Bridging the intention‐behaviour gap: Planning, self‐efficacy and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology & Health, 20, 143–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburne National Technology & Society Monitor (SNTSM). (20032010). Annual report. Retrieved from http://www.swinburne.edu.au/lss/spru/spru‐monitor.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Bowen, D. J., & Kardia, S. L. R. (2005). Research and practice opportunities at the intersection of health education, health behavior, and genomics. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 686–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar