138
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

On love, hate and knowledge

Pages 697-712 | Accepted 10 Dec 2008, Published online: 31 Dec 2017

References

  • Audi R, editor (1995). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Bakhtin M (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis.
  • Bakhtin M (1990). Art and answerability. Holquist M, Liapunov V, editors. Austin, TX: U Texas Press.
  • Barabasi AL (2002). Linked. New York, NY: Perseus.
  • Bion WR (1989). Learning from experience. London: Falmer.
  • Bohm D (1998). On creativity. London: Routledge.
  • Canestri J (2007). Language, symbolization, and psychosis: An introduction. In: Ambrosio G, Argentieri S, Canestri J, editors. Language, symbolization and psychosis, 1–18. London: Karnac.
  • Casati R (1994). Holes and other superficialities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Deely J (2005). Basics of semiotics. Tartu, Estonia: Tartu UP.
  • Freud S (1907c). The sexual enlightenment of children. SE 9, 129–41.
  • Freud S (1924d). The dissolution of the Oedipus complex. SE 19, 173–83.
  • Gampel Y. (2007). A language for remembering the future. In: Ambrosio G, Argentieri S, Canestri J, editors. Language, symbolization and psychosis, 64–81. London: Karnac.
  • Goux JJ (1990). Symbolic economies: After Marx and Freud. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP.
  • Green A (2004). Thirdness and psychoanalytic concepts. Psychoanal Q 73:99–135.
  • Green A (2005). To love or not to love: Eros and Eris. In: Green A, Kohon G. Love and its vicissitudes, 1–41. London: Routledge.
  • Grotstein JS (2007). A beam of intense darkness: Wilfred Bion’s legacy to psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
  • Holquist M (1990). Dialogism. London: Routledge.
  • Klein M (1926). Infant analysis. Int J Psychoanal 7:31–63.
  • Lacan J (2001). Ecrits. London: Routledge.
  • Loewald HW (2003). Lacan on paranoidic knowledge. Psychoanal Psychol 20:30–51.
  • Matte blanco I (1975). The unconscious as infinite sets: An essay in bi‐logic. London: Duckworth.
  • Mesterton‐gibbons M, Sherratt T (2009, in press). Animal network phenomena: Insights from triadic games. Complexity.
  • Neuman Y (2003). Processes and boundaries of the mind: Extending the limit line. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Neuman Y (2009a, in press). On the alpha‐function, chaotic cats, and unconscious memory. New Ideas in Psychology.
  • Neuman Y (2009b, in press). Peter Pan’s shadow and the relational matrix of the “I”. Semiotica.
  • Neuman Y (2009c, in press). Double binds, triadic binds. Semiotica.
  • Neuman Y, Nadav M, Bessor Y (2006). The pragmatics of bereavement. J Pragmatics 38:1369–84.
  • Ogden TH (1985). On potential space. Int J Psychoanal 66:129–41.
  • Olds DD (2000). A semiotic model of mind. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 48:497–529.
  • Ortega Y Gasset J (1959). The difficulty of reading. Diogenes 28:1–17.
  • Peirce CS (193158). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–8. Hartshorne C, Weiss P, editors, vols. 1–6; Burks AW, editor, vols. 7–8. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
  • Peirce CS (199298). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vols. 1–2. Houser N, Kloesel C, editors, vol. 1 [1867–1893], 1992; Peirce Edition Project, editors, vol. 2 [1893–1913], 1998. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP.
  • Piaget J (1970). Structuralism. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • Rotman B (1993). Signifying nothing: The semiotics of zero. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.
  • Salomonsson B (2007a). ‘Talk to me baby, tell me what’s the matter now’: Semiotics and developmental perspectives on communication in psychoanalytic infant treatment. Int J Psychoanal 88:127–46.
  • Salomonsson B (2007b). Semiotic transformations in psychoanalysis with infants and adults. Int J Psychoanal 88:1201–21.
  • Sebeok TA, Danesi M (2000). The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Segal H (1964). Introduction to the work of Melanie Klein. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Segal H (1981). Notes on symbol formation. In: The work of Hanna Segal: A Kleinian approach to clinical practice, 49–68. New York, NY: Aronson.
  • Silver A (1990). A psychosemiotic model: An interdisciplinary search for a common structural basis for psychoanalysis, symbol‐formation, and the semiotic of Charles S. Peirce. In: Grotstein JS, editor. Do I dare disturb the universe? A memorial to Wilfred R. Bion, 269–317. London: Karnac.
  • Steiner R (2007). Index, icon, symbol? Can Peirce’s descriptive classification be of any use to psychoanalysis? In: Ambrosio G, Argentieri S, Canestri J, editors. Language, symbolization and psychosis, 213–67. London: Karnac.
  • Szymborska W (2000). Poems new and collected. Orlando, FL: Harvest Books.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.