The analytic state of consciousness as a form of play and a foundational transference

References

• Aron L (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron L (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: Clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. Int J Psychoanal 87:349–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach S (1985). Narcissistic states and the therapeutic process. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Bach S (1994). The language of perversion and the language of love. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Bach S (2006). Getting from here to there: Analytic love, analytic process. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bálint M (1968). The basic fault. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson P (2005). Play in great apes and humans. In: Pellegrini AD, Smith PK, editors. The nature of play: Great apes and humans, 13–24. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin J (2006). Our appointment in Thebes: Acknowledging the analyst’s fear of doing harm. Presented at the Conference of the International Association for Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Boston, January, 2006. Unpublished
   Google Scholar
• Boesky D (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal Q 59:550–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bókay A (1998). Turn of fortune in psychoanalysis. Int Forum Psychoanal 7:189–99.
   Google Scholar
• Borgogno F (2009). The introjective analyst. Presented at ‘Conferenczi 09’ Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, October, 2009. Unpublished
   Google Scholar
• Briggs R (1992). An interpersonal approach to metaphor and play in child therapy. Presented at spring meeting of Division of Psychoanalysis, American Psychological Association, Philadelphia, April. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg P (1991). On knowing one’s patient inside out: The aesthetics of unconscious communication. Psychoanal Dialog 1:399–422.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg P (1994). ‘Speak! That I may see you’: Some reflections on dissociation, reality, and psychoanalytic listening. Psychoanal Dialog 4:517–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci W (1994). The multiple code theory and the psychoanalytic process. Ann Psychoanal 22:239–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci W, Maskit B (2007). Beneath the surface of the therapeutic interaction: The psychoanalytic method in modern dress. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 55:1355–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burghardt GM (2005). The genesis of animal play: Testing the limits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chused J (1982). The role of analytic neutrality in the use of the child analyst as a new object. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 30:3–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies JM (1994). Love in the afternoon: A relational reconsideration of desire and dread in the countertransference. Psychoanal Dialog 4:153–70.
   Google Scholar
• Dimascio AA, Boyd RW, Greenblatt M (1957). Physiological correlates of tension and antagonism during psychotherapy: A study of interpersonal physiology. Psychosom Med 19:99–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg DB (1984). Psychoanalytic engagement, II. Affective considerations. Contemp Psychoanal 20:560–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg DB (1996). On the analyst’s emotional availability and vulnerability. Contemp Psychoanal 32:275–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eibl‐eibesfeldt I (1982). The flexibility and affective autonomy of play. Behav Brain Sci 5:160–2.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Fagen R (1981). Animal play behavior. New York, NY: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1909). Introjection and transference. In: First contributions to psycho‐analysis, Jones E, translator, 35–93. New York, NY: Brunner Mazel, 1980. (Original work published 1916)
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1919). Technical difficulties in the analysis of a case of hysteria. in: Further contributions to the theory and technique of psycho‐analysis, Suttie JI, et al., translators, 189–97. London: Karnac, 1980. (Original work published 1926)
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1920). The further development of an active therapy in psycho‐analysis. In: Further contributions to the theory and technique of psycho‐analysis, Suttie JI, et al., translators, 198–217. London: Karnac, 1980. (Original work published 1926)
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1925). Contra‐indications to the ‘active’ psycho‐analytical technique. In: Further contributions to the theory and technique of psycho‐analysis, Suttie JI, et al., translators, 217–30. London: Karnac, 1980. (Original work published 1926)
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1929a). The unwelcome child and his death instinct. In: Bálint M, editor. Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho‐analysis, Mosbacher E, et al., translators, 102–7. New York, NY: Brunner Mazel, 1980. (Original work published 1955)
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1929b). The principle of relaxation and neocatharsis. In: Bálint M, editor. Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho‐analysis, Mosbacher E, et al., translators, 108–25. New York, NY: Brunner Mazel, 1980. (Original work published 1955)
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1931). Child‐analysis in the analysis of adults. In: Bálint M, editor. Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho‐analysis, Mosbacher E, et al., translators, 126–42. New York, NY: Brunner Mazel. (Original work published 1955)
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1932 [1988]). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. Dupont J, editor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child. In: Bálint M, editor. Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho‐analysis, Mosbacher E, et al., translators, 156–167. New York, NY: Brunner Mazel, 1980. (Original work published 1955)
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P, Target M (1996). Playing with reality: I. Theory of mind and the normal development of psychic reality. Int J Psychoanal 77:217–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox RP (1984). The principle of abstinence reconsidered. Int Rev Psychoanal 11:227–36.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel JB (1998). The play’s the thing: How the essential processes of therapy are seen most clearly in child therapy. Psychoanal Dialog 8:149–82.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel J (2002a). Exploring Ferenczi’s concept of identification with the aggressor: Its role in trauma, everyday life, and the therapeutic relationship. Psychoanal Dialog 12:101–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel J (2002b). Identification and ‘traumatic aloneness’: Commentary on discussions by Berman and Bonomi. Psychoanal Dialog 12:159–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel J (2006). Diagnosis‐of‐the‐moment and what kind of good object the patient needs the analyst to be: Commentary on paper by Skolnick. Psychoanal Dialog 16:29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel J (2011). Ferenczi’s concepts of identification with the aggressor and play as foundational processes in the analytic relationship. In: Druck AB, Ellman C, Freedman N, Thaler A, editors. A new Freudian synthesis: Clinical process in the next generation. 173–200. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman N (1985). The concept of transformation in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Psychol 2:317–39.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman N, Russell J (2003). Symbolization of the analytic discourse. Psychoanal Contemp Thought 26:39–87.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman N, Hurvich, Ward R (2011). Another kind of evidence: Studies on internalization, annihilation, anxiety, and progressive symbolization in the psychoanalytic process. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Freud A (1936). The writings of Anna Freud, vol. 2: The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York, NY: International UP, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1900). The interpretation of dreams. SE 4, ix–627.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psycho‐analysis. SE 12, 109–20.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1914). Remembering, repeating and working‐through (Further Recommendations on the Technique of Psycho‐Analysis II). SE 12, 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1915). Observations on transference‐love. SE 12, 157–71.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1919). Lines of advance in psycho‐analytic therapy. SE 17, 157–68.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. SE 18, 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard GO (1995). The early history of boundary violations in psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 43:1115–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg JR (1991). Countertransference and reality. Psychoanal Dialog 1:52–73.
   Google Scholar
• Groos K (1898). The play of animals, Baldwin EL, translator. New York, NY: Appleton.
   Google Scholar
• Groos K (1901). The play of man, Baldwin EL, translator. New York, NY: Appleton.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann P (1950). On counter‐transference. Int J Psychoanal, 31:81–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman IZ (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemp Psychoanal 19:389–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman IZ (2009). Therapeutic passion in the countertransference. Psychoanal Dialog 19:617–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizinga J (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon. (Dutch original published in 1938)
   Google Scholar
• Hurst DM (1996). Abstinence and interaction. Psychoanal Inq 16:78–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutt C (1970). Specific and diversive exploration. In: Reese HW, Lipsitt LP, editors. Advances in child development and behavior, vol. 5, 119–80. New York, NY: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Isakower O (1992a). Chapter five: The analyzing instrument: States of consciousness and the dream psychology of Dr. Bertram Lewin (A further expansion of the concept of the analyzing instrument). J Clin Psychoanal 1:204–08.
   Google Scholar
• Isakower O (1992b). Chapter two: Preliminary thoughts on the analyzing instrument. J Clin Psychoanal 1:184–94.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs T (1999). On the question of self‐disclosure by the analyst: Error or advance in technique? Psychoanal Q 68:159–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killingmo B (1989). Conflict and deficit: Implications for technique. Int J Psychoanal 70:65–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killingmo B (1997). The so‐called rule of abstinence revisited. Scand Psychoanal Rev 20:144–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut H (1971). The analysis of the self. New York, NY: International UP.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut H (1977). The restoration of the self. New York, NY: International UP.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut H (1984). How does analysis cure? Goldberg A, Stepansky P, editors. Chicago, IL: U Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan J (1979). The neurotic’s individual myth. Psychoanal Q 48:405–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson EA (1972). The fallacy of understanding. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin BD (1954). Sleep, narcissistic neurosis, and the analytic situation. Psychoanal Q 23:487–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin BD (1955). Dream psychology and the analytic situation. Psychoanal Q 24:169–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewald HW (1960). On the therapeutic action of psycho‐analysis. Int J Psychoanal 41:16–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewald HW (1971). The transference neurosis: Comments on the concept and the phenomenon. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 19:54–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz K (1971). Psychology and phylogeny. In: Bruner JS, Jolly A, Silva K, editors. Play: Its role in development and evolution, 84–95. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon EJ (1993). Play: Its role in child analysis, its fate in adult analysis. In: The many meanings of play: A psychoanalytic perspective, 172–82. New Haven, CT: Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Maroda K (2002). No place to hide. Contemp Psychoanal 38:101–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meares R (1993). The metaphor of play. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner WW (1998). Neutrality, abstinence, and the therapeutic alliance. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 46:1089–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar S (1968). The psychology of play. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell SA (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell SA (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell SA (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden TH (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int J Psychoanal 75:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget J (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood, Gattegno C, Hodgson FM, translators. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Poland WS (1984). On the analyst’s neutrality. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 32:283–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racker H (1968). Transference and countertransference. New York, NY: International UP.
   Google Scholar
• Rank O (1924). Eine Neurosenanalyse in Trumen. Vienna: IPV.
   Google Scholar
• Renik O (1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal Q 62:553–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler J (1976). Countertransference and role‐responsiveness. Int Rev Psychoanal 3:43–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartzman HB (1982). Play as a mode. Behav Brain Sci 5:168–9.
   Google Scholar
• Singer JL (1995). Imaginative play in childhood: Precursor of subjunctive thoughts, daydreaming, and adult pretending games. in: Pellegrini AD, Smith PK, editors. The nature of play: Great apes and humans, 187–219. New York, NY: Guilford,
   Google Scholar
• Skolnick NJ (2006). What’s a good object to do? Psychoanal Dialog 16:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PK (2005). Social and pretend play in children. In: Pellegrini AD, Smith PK, editors. The nature of play: Great apes and humans, 173–209. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Steingart I (1995). A thing apart: Love and reality in the therapeutic relationship. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton‐smith B (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber ES (1954). Exploring the therapeutic use of countertransference data. Psychiatry 17:331–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1960a). The theory of the parent–infant relationship. Int J Psychoanal 41:585–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1960b). Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. In: The maturational processes and the facilitating environment, 140–52. New York, NY: International UP, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1963). The development of the capacity for concern. in: The maturational processes and the facilitating environment, 73–82. New York, NY: International UP, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Wolstein B (1988a). Introduction. In: Wolstein B, editor. Essential papers on countertransference, 1–15. New York, NY: New York UP.
   Google Scholar
• Wolstein B (1988b). Observations of countertransference. in: Wolstein B, editor. Essential papers on countertransference, 225–61. New York, NY: New York UP. [(1959). In: Countertransference, 79–123. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.]
   Google Scholar