References
- Alexander F (1925). A metapsychological description of the process of cure. Int J Psychoanal6:13–34.
- Alexander F (1950). Analysis of the therapeutic factors in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanal Q19:483–500.
- Anzieu D (1970). Éléments d’une théorie de l’interprétation. Rev Fr Psychanal34:755–819.
- Arlow J (1979). Metaphor and psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal Q48:363–85.
- Baranes J‐J, Janin C (1993). Argument. Rev Fr Psychanal57:5–6.
- Benassy M (1962). Intervention au colloque sur les interprétations en thérapeutique psychanalytique. Rev Fr Psychanal26:43–50.
- Bibring E (1937). Symposium on the theory of the therapeutic results of psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal18:170–89.
- Bion W (1963). Elements of psychoanalysis. London: Heinemann.
- Danon‐boileau L (2007). La force du langage. Rev Fr Psychanal71:1341–409.
- Diatkine R (1983). Introduction à une discussion sur l’interprétation. Rev Fr Psychanal47:717–33.
- Donnet J‐L (1983). L’enjeu de l’interprétation. Rev Fr Psychanal47:1135–50.
- Donnet J‐L (2007). Entre l’agir et la parole. Rev Fr Psychanal71:1567–77.
- Etchegoyen H (1983). Fifty years after the mutative interpretation. Int J Psychoanal64:445–59.
- Fain M (1983). Introduction au colloque de Deauville. Rev Fr Psychanal47:707–16.
- Fain M (1993). Nécessité d’un référent au cours de l’étude de l’interprétation. Rev Fr Psychanal57:157–60.
- Fenichel O (1938-39). Problems of psychoanalytic technique. Psychoanal Q7:421–42; 8:57–87, 164–85, 303–24, 438–70.
- Freud S (1891). Zur Auffassungder Aphasien. Vienna: Deuticke. [(1953). On aphasia: A critical study. New York, NY: International UP.]
- Freud S (1901). The psychopathology of everyday life. SE6, 1–290.
- Freud S (1916-17[1915–17]). Introductory lectures on psycho‐analysis. SE15 & 16.
- Freud S (1921c). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. SE18, 67–144.
- Freud S (1925h). Negation. SE19, 235–240.
- Freud S (1940a[1938]). An outline of psychoanalysis. SE23, 141–208.
- Glover E (1931). The therapeutic effect of inexact interpretation: A contribution to the theory of suggestion. Int J Psychoanal12:397–411.
- Glover E (1937). On the theory of the therapeutic results of psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal18:125–32.
- Glover E (1954). Therapeutic criteria of psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal35:95–101.
- Gray P (1987). On the technique of analysis of the superego: An introduction. Psychoanal Q56:130–54.
- Grossman L (1996). The analyst’s influence. Psychoanal Q65:681–92.
- Heimann P (1956). Dynamics of transference interpretations. Int J Psychoanal37:303–10.
- Heimann P (1962). The curative factors in psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal43:228–31.
- Held R (1962). Intervention au colloque sur les interprétations en thérapeutique psychanalytique. Rev Fr Psychanal26:53–60.
- Horowitz M (1987). Some notes on insight and its failures. Psychoanal Q56:177–96.
- Isaacs S (1939). Criteria for interpretation. Int J Psychoanal20:148–60.
- Kahn L (2007). L’effectuation hallucinatoire et la deformation. Rev Fr Psychanal71:1559–65.
- Klauber J (1972). The relationship of transference and interpretation. In: Difficulties in the analytic encounter, 25–43. London: Free Association Books, 1986.
- Kris E (1956). On some vicissitudes of insight in psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal37:445–55.
- Lacan J (1953). Fonction et champ de la parole et du langage en psychanalyse. In: Écrits, 237–322. Paris: Le Seuil, 1966. [(2006). The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In: Ecrits, Fink B, translator. New York, NY: Norton.]
- Löwenstein R (1952). Some remarks on the role of speech in psychoanalytic technique. In: Papers of Rudolph M Löwenstein, 52–67. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1982.
- Major R (1974). The language of interpretation. Int Rev Psychoanal1:425–35.
- M’uzan M de (1978). La bouche de l’inconscient. Nouv Rev Psychanal17:89–97.
- M’uzan M de (1983). Interpréter: pour qui, pourquoi?Rev Fr Psychanal47:784–93.
- M’uzan M de (1993). Interprétation et mémoire. Rev Fr Psychanal57:7–20.
- M’uzan M de (1999). L’interprétation? Question de formulation. InterprétationI, 103–17. Monographie de la Revue Française de Psychanalyse. Paris: PUF.
- Nacht S (1962). The curative factors in psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal43:206–11.
- Poland W (1986). The analyst’s words. Psychoanal Q55:244–72.
- Prat R, Israël P (2007). Actes qui parlent et interprétActions. Rev Fr Psychanal71:1585–91.
- Radó S (1925). The economic principle in psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal6:35–44.
- Ricoeur P (1975). La métaphore vive. Paris: Le Seuil.
- Rosenfeld H (1972). A critical appreciation of James Strachey’s paper on the nature of the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal53:455–461.
- Roussillon R (2007). Le langage et l’objet. Rev Fr Psychanal71:1441–7.
- Segal H (1962). The curative factors in psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal43:212–17.
- Sharpe E (1940). Psycho‐physical problems revealed in language: An examination of the metaphor. Int J Psychoanal21:201–13.
- Sirois F (1995). Interpretation and affect: Aliquis. Int J Psychoanal76:1095–1107.
- Strachey J (1934). The nature of the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal15:127–59.
- Strachey J (1937). Symposium on the theory of the therapeutic results of psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal18:139–45.
- Wainrib S (2010). L’interprétation et quoi d’autre?Rev Fr Psychanal74:747–59.