The Firm or the Region: What Determines the Innovation Behavior of European Firms?

References

• Amin, A., and Thrift, N. 1994. Living in the global. In Globalisation, institutions, and regional development in Europe, ed. A. Amin and N. Thrift, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, O., and Sternberg, R. 2000. Do manufacturing firms profit from intraregional innovation linkages? An empirical based answer. European Planning Studies 8:465–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., and Cooke, P. 1999. Local learning and interactive innovation networks in a global economy. In Making connections. Technological learning and regional economic change, ed. E. J. Malecki and P. Oinas, 145–78. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D., and Feldman, M. 1996. R & D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review 86:630–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydalot, P., and Keeble, D., eds. 1988. High technology industry and innovative environments: The European experience. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braczyk, H.-J.; Cooke, P.; and Heidenreich, M., eds. 1998. Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E.; Budil-Nadvornikova, H.; and Kleinknecht, A. 1999. Are urban agglomerations a better breeding place for product innovation? An analysis of new product announcements. Regional Studies 33:541–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., ed. 1991. Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London and New York: Belhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., and Capello, R. 2000. The role of inter-SME networking and links in innovative high-technology milieux. In High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe, ed. D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson, 118–55. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R. 1999. Spatial transfer of knowledge in high technology milieux: Learning versus collective learning process. Regional Studies 33:353–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Union. 1999. Sixth periodic report on the social and economic situation and regional development of regions in the European Union. Luxemburg: EU.
   Google Scholar
• Conti, S. 1993. The network perspective in industrial geography: Towards a model. Geografiska Annaler 75 B:115–30.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 1997. Research and development. Annual statistics. Luxemburg: Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1994. Innovation and growth. In The handbook of industrial innovation, ed. M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell, 78–93. Cheltenham, U.K.: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 1993. The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In The embedded firm—On the socioeconomics of industrial networks, ed. G. Grabher, 255–77. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. 1997. Die Bedeutung der lernen-den Region für die regionale Innovations-förderung (The importance of the learning region for regional innovation policy). Geographische Zeitschrift 85:159–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A.; Trajtenberg, M.; and Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108:576–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., and Vaessen, P. 1995. Growth-orientated SMEs in unfavourable regional environments. Regional Studies 29:489–505.
   Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., and Wilkinson, F., eds. 2000. High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A., and Poot, T. P. 1992. Do regions matter for R & D Regional Studies 26:221–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschatzky, K. 1998. Firm innovation and region: The role of space in innovation process. International Journal of Innovation Management 2:383–408.
   Google Scholar
• Koschatzky, K. 2001. Räumliche Aspekte im Inno-vationsprozeβ. Ein Beitrag zur neuen Wirtschaftsgeographie aus Sicht der regionalen Innovationsforschung (Spatial aspects of the innovation process. A comment on the new economic geography from the view of regional innovation research). Wirtschaftsgeographie Series, Vol. 19. Münster: Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. 1996. Spatial clustering at the cross-roads of territorial and industrial development: A review. Paper presented at EUNIT-Seminar, The Territorial Dimension of Innovation, 21–23 May, at Dortmund, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Å., ed. 1992. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. 1997. Technology and economic development: The dynamics of local, regional, and national competitiveness. 2d ed. London and Boston: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell, P.; Eskelinen, H.; Hannibalsson, I.; Malmberg, A.; and Vatne, E. 1998. Competitiveness, localised learning and regional development—Specialisation and prosperity in small open economies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Krahmer, F., and Gundrum, U. 1995. Innovationsförderung im ländlichen Raum (Innovation Policy in Rural Areas). Raumforschung und Raumordnung 53:177–85.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., ed. 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative study. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, P., and Reggiani, A. 2000. Drivers of innovation: A comparative study on innovation in European cities by means of multi-criteria analysis. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 91:308–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schamp, E. W. 2000. Vernetzte Produktion. Industriegeographie aus institutioneller Perspektive (Networked production. Industrial geography in an institutional perspective). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, J., and Kirby, M. 1998. Innovation and the theoretical base of technopole planning. Progress in Planning 49:159–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenke, G. 1999. Governance structures and SME/large-firm relationships in an innovative milieu—Evidence from a European core region. Working Paper no. 99–04. Cologne, Germany: Dept. of Economic and Social Geography, Univ. of Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. 1996. Government R & D expenditure and space: Empirical evidence from five advanced industrial economies. Research Policy 25:741–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. 2000. Innovation networks and regional development—Evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS): Theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue. European Planning Studies 8:389–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R., and Tamásy, C. 1999. Munich as Germany’s no. 1 high technology region—Empirical evidence, theoretical explanations and the role of small firm/large firm relationships. Regional Studies 33:367–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and Scott, A., eds. 1992. Pathways to industrialization and regional development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and Walker, R. 1989. The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth. New York: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tamásy, C., and Sternberg, R. 2000. Regional institutional and policy framework. In High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe, ed. D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson, 57–90. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F. 1995. The innovation process and local environment. In The industrial enterprise and its environment: Spatial perspectives, ed. S. Conti et al., 171–93. Aldershot, U.K.: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Vaessen, P. 1993. Small business growth in contrasting environments. Netherlands Geographical Studies Series, no. 165. Utrecht and Nijmegen: Royal Dutch Geographic Society, Catholic Univ. of Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar