Financial Valuation of the German Model: The Negative Relationship Between Ownership Concentration and Stock Market Returns, 1997–2001

References

• Berndt, C. 1998. Ruhr firms between dynamic change and structural persistence: Globalization, the “German model” and regional place-dependence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23:331–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie, Z.; Kane, A.; and Marcus, A. J. 2002. Investments. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Christopherson, S. 2002. Why do national labor market practices continue to diverge in the global economy? The “missing link” of investment rules. Economic Geography 78:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L. 2003. European pensions and global finance. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L.; Gertler, M. S.; and Feldman, M., eds. 2000. The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L., and O’Connor, K. 1997. The informational content of financial products and the spatial structure of the global finance industry. In Spaces of globalization, ed. K. Cox, 89–114. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L.; Tracey, P.; and Lawton Smith, H. 2001. Agents, endowments and path dependence: A model of multi-jurisdictional regional development. Geographische Zeitschrift 89:165–80.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L., and Wójcik, D. 2003. An economic geography of global finance: Ownership concentration and stock price volatility in German firms and regions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93:909–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L., and Wójcik, D. Forthcoming. Path dependence and the alchemy of finance: The economic geography of the German model 1997–2003. Environment and Planning A.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., and Morgan, K. 1998. The associational economy: Firms, regions, and innovation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C.; Le Galès, P.; Trigilia, C.; and Voelzkow, H. 2001. Local production systems in Europe: Rise or demise? Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C., and Streeck, W., eds. 1997. Political economy of modern capitalism: Mapping convergence and diversity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H., and Lehn, K. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93:1115–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsche Börse. 2003. Leitfaden zu den Aktienindizes der Deutschen Börse. Frankfurt. Available online: http://www.deutscheboerse.com.
   Google Scholar
• Diermeier, J., and Solnik, B. 2000. Global pricing of equity. Mimeo Chicago: Brinson Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Dimson, E.; Marsh, P.; and Staunton, M. 2002. Triumph of the optimists. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doidge, C.; Karolyi, A.; and Stulz, R. 2002. Why are foreign firms listed in the U.S. worth more? Working Paper 8538. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dore, R. 2000. Stock market capitalism: Welfare capitalism. Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falkenstein, E. G. 1996. Preferences for stock characteristics as revealed by mutual portfolio holdings. Journal of Finance 51:111–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, J.; Mayer, C.; and Rossi, S. 2003. The origination and evolution of ownership and control. Working Paper 09/2003. Brussels: European Corporate Governance Institute. Available online: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract_id354381.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, G.; Krauss, G.; and Wolf, H.-G., eds. 1999. Die Bindungen der Globalisierung. Interorganisationsbeziehungen im regionalen und globalen Wirtschaftsraum. Marburg, Germany: Metropolis Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Grinblatt, M., and Keloharju, M. 2001. How distance, language, and culture influence stock holdings and trades. Journal of Finance 56:1053–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and Soskice, D., eds. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hau, H. 2001. Location matters: An examination of trading profits. Journal of Finance 56:1959–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrigel, G. 2000. Industrial constructions: The sources of German industrial power. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P., and Thompson, G. 1997. Globalization in question: International economic relations and forms of public governance. In Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions, ed. J. R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer, 337–60. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, J. R., and Boyer, R., eds. 1997. Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höpner, M. 2001. Corporate governance in transition: Ten empirical findings on shareholder value and industrial relations in Germany. Discussion Paper 01/5. Köln, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Gessellschafts-forschung.
   Google Scholar
• Hopt, K. J. 1998. The German two-tier board: Experience, theories, reforms. In Comparative corporate governance: The state-of-the-art and emerging research, ed. K. J. Hopt, H. Kanda, M. J. Roe, E. Wymeersch, and S. Prigge, 225–58. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopt, K. J.; Kanda, H.; Roe, M. J.; Wymeersch, E.; and Prigge, S., eds. 1998. Comparative corporate governance: The state-of-the-art and emerging research. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, W. 2002. The world we’re in. London: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Jürgens, U., and Rupp, J. 2002. The German system of corporate governance—Characteristics and changes. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Available online: http://www.skylla.wz-berlin.de/pdf/2002/ii02-203.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52:1131–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106:1113–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance 57:1147–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardo, D., and Pagano, M. 1999. Law and equity markets: A simple model. Discussion Paper 2276. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Morck, R., ed. 2000. Concentrated corporate ownership. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morck, R., and Yang, F. 2001. The mysterious growing value of S & P500 membership. Working Paper 8654. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, M.; Roell, A.; and Zechner, J. 2002. The geography of equities listing: Why do companies list abroad Journal of Finance 57:2651–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persaud, A. 2003. The folly of value-at-risk. Available online: http://www.gresham.ac.uk/commerce/Lect021202.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. A., and Rajan, R. 2002. Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. Journal of Finance 57:2533–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pred, A. 1973. Urban growth and the circulation of information. The United States system of cities, 1790–1840. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prigge, S. 1998. A survey of German corporate governance. In Comparative corporate governance: The state-of-the-art and emerging research, ed. K. J. Hopt, H. Kanda, M. J. Roe, E. Wymeersch, and S. Prigge, 943–1044. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A., and Zademach, H.-M. 2003. Rising metropolis: The geography of mergers and acquisitions in Germany. Urban Studies 40:1895–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, M. 1994. Strong managers, weak owners. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, W. F. 1994. The Sharpe ratio. Journal of Portfolio Management. Fall. Available online: http://www.stanford.edu/~wfsharpe/art/sr/ sr.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. 2000. Irrational exuberance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. 2002. Bubbles, human judgement, and expert opinion. Financial Analysts Journal 58(3):18–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. 2000. Inefficient markets: An introduction to behavioral finance. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solnik, B. 2000. International investments. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Steil, B.; Berglöf, E.; Choi, F. D. S.; Dale, R.; Davis, E. P.; Frankel, J. A.; Giddy, I.; Levich, R. M.; Pagano, M.; Saunders, A.; Schwartz, R. A.; Walter, I.; and Wolfe, S. 1996. The European equity markets: The state of the union and an agenda for the millennium. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Theisen, M. R. 1998. Empirical evidence and economic comments on board structure in Germany. In Comparative corporate governance: The state-of-the-art and emerging research, ed. K. J. Hopt, H. Kanda, M. J. Roe, E. Wymeersch, and S. Prigge, 259–66. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, W., and Downing, J. 2001. Information markets. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wójcik, D. 2002. The Länder are the building blocks of the German capital market. Regional Studies 36:877–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wójcik, D. 2003. Change in the German model of corporate governance: Evidence from block-holdings 1997–2001. Environment and Planning A 35:1431–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar