Polycentric Phoenix

References

• Abdel-Rahman, H. M. 1994. Economies of scope in intermediate goods and a system of cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics 24:497–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Advanced Planning Task Force. 1959. Land use of the Phoenix urban area: A study basic to long range planning. Phoenix: City of Phoenix and Maricopa County.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, W. 1964. Location and land use. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anas, A.;Arnott, R.;and Small, K. A. 1998. Urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Literature 36:1426–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., and Bogart, W. 2001. The structure of sprawl: Identifying and characterizing employment centers in polycentric metropolitan areas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60:147–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baerwald, T. 1978. Emergence of a new “downtown. Geographical Review 68:309–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barff, R. A. 1987. Industrial clustering and the organization of production: A point pattern analysis of manufacturing in Cincinnati, Ohio. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenman, J. E. 1998. The suburbanization of the institutional investment advisory industry: Metropolitan Philadelphia, 1983–1993. The Professional Geographer 50:112–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart, W. T., and Ferry, W. C. 1999. Employment centres in greater Cleveland: Evidence of evolution in a formerly mono-centric city. Urban Studies 36:2099–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakman, S.;Garretsen, H.;van Marrewijk, C.;and van den Berg, M. 1999. The return of Zipf: Towards a further understanding of the rank-size distribution. Journal of Regional Science 39:183–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K. 2000. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 23:160–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., and Wu, K. 1997. Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning A 29:865–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., and Wu, K. 1998. Sub-centering and commuting: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Urban Studies 35:1059–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Scottsdale. 2005. Scottsdale Airport history. 10 September. Available online: http://www.ci.scottsdale.az.us/Airport/History.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, W. J.;Drolet, R.;and Polèse, M. 1996. The intrametropolitan location of high order services: Patterns, factors and mobility in Montreal. Papers in Regional Science 75:293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, W. J., and Shearmur, R. 2002. Agglomeration and dispersion of high-order service employment in the Montreal metropolitan region, 1981–1996. Urban Studies 39:359–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, A., and Anderson, W. 2002. Using spatial statistics to examine the pattern of urban land development in Halifax-Dartmouth. The Professional Geographer 54:521–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Duany, A.;Playter-Zyberk, E.;and Speck, J. 2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, R. A. 1986. Multinucleation in metropolitan economies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 76:331–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feser, E. J., and Sweeney, S. H. 2000. A test for the coincident economic and spatial clustering of business enterprises. Journal of Geographical Systems 2:349–73.
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, T., and Hartshorn, T. A. 1995. The changing metropolitan structure of Atlanta, Georgia: Locations of functions and regional structure in a multinucleated urban area. Urban Geography 16:680–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gad, G. 1979. Face-to-face linkages and office decentralization potentials: A study of Toronto. In Spatial patterns of office growth and location, ed. P. W. Daniels, 277–323. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gad, G. 1999. Downtown Montreal and Toronto: Distinct places with much in common. Canadian Journal of Regional Science 22:142–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gammage, G. 1999. Phoenix in perspective: Reflections on developing the desert. Tempe: Herberger Center for Design Excellence, College of Architecture and Environmental Design, Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Garreau, J. 1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliano, G., and Small, K. A. 1991. Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21:163–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., and Kahn, M. E. 2003. Sprawl and urban growth. NBER Working Papers 9733, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.
   Google Scholar
• Glasmeier, A. 1988. Factors governing the development of high tech industry, agglomerations: A tale of three cities. Regional Studies 15:287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goe, W. R.;Lentnek, B.;MacPherson, A.;and Phillips, D. 2000. The role of contact requirements in producer services location. Environment and Planning A 32:131–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., and Wheeler, J. O. 2002. The location and suburbanization of business and professional services in Atlanta. Growth and Change 33:341–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P., and Richardson, H. W. 1996a. Beyond polycentricity: The dispersed metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970–1990. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:289–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P., and Richardson, H. W. 1996b. Why sprawl is good. Cascade Policy Institute. 28 March. Available online: http://www.cascadepolicy.org/growth/gordon.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P., and Richardson, H. W. 1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal Journal of the American Planning Association 63:95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, J. W., and Campbell, H. S. 1997. The suburbanization of producer service employment. Growth and Change 28:335–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartshorn, T. A., and Muller, P. O. 1989. Suburban downtowns and the transformations of metropolitan Atlanta’s business landscape. Urban Geography 10:375–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, C. E. 2001. Leapfrogging, urban sprawl, and growth management: Phoenix, 1950–2000. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60:245–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlanfeldt, K. R. 1995. The importance of the central city to the regional and national economy. A review of the arguments and empirical evidence. Cityscape 1:125–50.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1996. The self-organizing economy. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kunstler, J. H. 1993. The geography of nowhere: The rise and decline of America’s man-made landscape. New York: Simon &Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and Wong, D. W. S. 2001. Statistical analysis with ArcView GIS. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 2001. How cities work: Suburbs, sprawl, and the roads not taken. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. F., and Prather, P. J. 1994. Suburban employment centers: The case of Chicago. Urban Studies 31:201–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen, D. P. 2001. Polycentric urban structure: The case of Milwaukee. Economic Perspectives 25:15–27.
   Google Scholar
• McMillen, D. P., and McDonald, J. F. 1998. Suburban subcenters and employment density in metropolitan Chicago. Journal of Urban Economics 43:157–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen, D. P., and Smith, S. C. 2003. The number of subcenters in large urban areas. Journal of Urban Economics 53:321–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mieszkowski, P., and Mills, E. S. 1993. The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7:135–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mieszkowski, P., and Smith, B. A. 1991. Urban decentralization: The case of Houston. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21:183–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, E. S., and Hamilton, B. W. 1994. Urban economics. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, E. S., and Lubuele, L. S. 1997. Inner cities. Journal of Economic Literature 35:727–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. 1986. Labor demand, labor supply, and the suburbanization of low-wage office work. In Production, work and territory, ed. A. Scott and M. Storper, 149–71. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• ÓhUallacháin, B., and Reid, N. 1991. The location and growth of business and professional services in American metropolitan areas. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81:254–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÓhUallacháin, B., and Reid, N. 1992. The intrametropolitan location of services in the United States. Urban Geography 13:334–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, A. 2003. Urban economics. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, M. J., and Mackun, P. J. 2001. Population change and distribution: 1990–2000. U.S. Census Bureau. 28 March. Available online: http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/c2kbr01-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pivo, G. 1990. The net of mixed beads: Suburban office development in six regions. Journal of the American Planning Associations 56:457–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex, T. R. 2000. Midtown, downtown form metro Phoenix core. Arizona Business 47:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., and Coffey, W. J. 2002. A tale of four cities: Intra-metropolitan employment distribution in Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Ottawa-Hull, 1981–1996. Environment and Planning A 34:575–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanback, T. M. 1991. The new suburbanization: Challenge to the central city. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. 2003. County business patterns, Arizona: 2001. 12 September 2005. Available online: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/01cbp/cbp01-4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. 2004. Statistical abstract of the United States. 12 September 2005. Available online: http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-04.html.
   Google Scholar