Inventive Megaregions of the United States: Technological Composition and Location

References

• Acs Z. J.; Anselin, L.; and Varga, A. 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 31:1069–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. 1990. Innovation and small firms. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J.; FitzRoy, F.; and Smith, I. 2002. High technology employment and R&D in cities: Heterogeneity vs. specialization. Annals of Regional Science 36:373–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis 27:93–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 2003. GeoDa 0.9 user’s guide. Urbana: Spatial Analysis Laboratory, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L.; Varga, A.; and Acs, Z. 1997. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42:422–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D., and Pianta, M. 1996. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 16:451–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariba, G.; Espa, A.; and Quah, D. 2008. A class of spatial econometric methods in the empirical analysis of clusters of firms in the space. Empirical Economics 34:81–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 1987. Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal 99:116–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and Feldman, M. P. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86:630–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H.; Malmberg, A.; and Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28:31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barde, S. 2010. Knowledge spillovers, black holes and the equilibrium location of vertically linked industries. Journal of Economic Geography 10:27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, C., and Schiffauerova, A. 2009. Who’s right: Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy 38:318–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertinelli, L., and Decrop, J. 2005. Geographical agglomeration: Ellison and Glaeser’s index applied to the case of Belgian manufacturing industry. Regional Studies 39: 567–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L.; Lobo, J.; and Strumsky, D. 2007. Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Research Policy 36:107–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Osorio, B., and Rodríquez-Pose, A. 2004. From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change 35:434–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and Iammarino, S. 2009. Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography 85:289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T. F., and Trajtenberg, M. 1995. General purpose technologies “engine of growth”? Journal of Econometrics 65:83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E., and Kleinknecht, A. 1997. Measuring the unmeasurable: A country’s non-R&D expenditure on product and service innovation. Research Policy 25:1235–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlino, G. A.; Chatterjee, S.; and Hunt, R. M. 2007. Urban density and the rate of invention. Journal of Urban Economics 61:389–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Co, C. 2002. Evolution of the geography of innovation: Evidence from patent data. Growth and Change 33:393–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes, P. 2000. Economic structure and local growth: France, 1984–1993. Journal of Urban Economics 47:329–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copus, A.; Skuras, D.; and Tsegenidi, K. 2008. Innovation and peripherality: An empirical comparative study of SMEs in six European Union member countries. Economic Geography 84:51–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daultrey, S. 1976. Principal components analysis. London: Institute of British Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. A. 1990. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review 80:355–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devereux, M. P.; Griffith, R.; and Simpson, H. 2004. The geographic distribution of production activity in the UK. Regional Science and Urban Economics 34:533–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and Overman, H. G. 2008. Exploring the detailed location patterns of U.K. manufacturing industries using microgeographic data. Journal of Regional Science 48:213–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and Puga, D. 2001. Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review 91:1454–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and Puga, D. 2004. The micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In Handbook of regional and urban economics, Vol 4., eds J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse, 2063–117. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ejermo, O. 2005. Technological diversity and Jacobs’ externality hypothesis revisited. Growth and Change 36:167–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E. L. 1997. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy 105:889–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., and Audretsch, D. B. 1999. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization, and localized competition. European Economic Review 43:409–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., and Lendel, I. 2010. Under the lens: The geography of optical science as an emerging industry. Economic Geography 86:147–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feser, E.; Goldstein, H.; Renski, H.; and Renault, C. 2002. Regional technology assets and opportunities: The geographic clustering of high-tech industry, science and innovation in Appalachia. Washington, DC: Appalachian Regional Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. M., and Varga, A. 2003. Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Annals of Regional Science 37:303–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R.; Gulden, T.; and Mellander, C. 2008. The rise of the mega-region. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1:459–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K.; van Oort, F. G.; and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41:685–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, M. P. R.; Krugman, P.; and Venables, A. 1999. The spatial economy: Cities regions and international trade, Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. 2003. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefined tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography 3:75–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L.; Kallal, H. D.; Scheinkman, J.; and Shleifer, A. 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100:1126–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28:1661–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H.; Jaffe, A. B.; and Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons insights and methodological tools. National Bureau Economic Research. Working paper 8498. Available online: http://www.nber.org/papers/w8498.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, V. 2003. Marshall’s scale economies. Journal of Urban Economics 53:1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson V.; Kuncoro A.; and Turner, M. 1995. Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy 103:1067–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, T. J., and Stevens, J. J. 2004. Geographic concentration and establishment size: Analysis in an alternative economic geography model. Journal of Economic Geography 4:227–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J.R.L. 2002. Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies 39:871–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B.; Trajtenberg, M.; and Fogarty, M. S. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7631
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B.; Trajtenberg, M.; Henderson R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. K. N., and Brown, A. 2004. How the West has won: Regional and industrial inversion in U.S. patent activity. Economic Geography 80:241–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson D. K. N.; Siripong, N.; and Brown, A. S. 2006. The demise of distance? The declining role of physical proximity for knowledge transmission. Growth and Change 37:19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketelhönhn, N. W. 2006. The role of clusters as sources of dynamic externalities in the US semiconductor industry. Journal of Economic Geography 6:679–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 1995. Expansion of markets and the geographic distribution of economic activities: The trends in U.S. regional manufacturing structure, 1860–1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:881–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A.; Van Montfort, K.; and Brouwer, E. 2002. The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11(2):109–21.
   Google Scholar
• Klier, T. H., and Rubenstein, J. 2008. Who really made your car? Restructuring and geographic change in the auto industry, Kalamazoo, Mich: W. E. Upjohn Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 2011. The new economic geography: Now middle-aged. Regional Studies 45:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang. R., and Knox, P. K. 2009. The new metropolis: Rethinking megalopolis. Regional Studies 43:789–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D-S., and á hUallacháin, B. 2012. Spatial, network, and regional proximity in American biotechnology. In Creative knowledge cities: Myths, visions and realities, ed. M. van Geenhuizen and P. Nijkamp. Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, R. C.; Klevorick, A. K.; Nelson, R. R.; Winter, S.G. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3:783–831.
   Google Scholar
• Lobo, J., and Strumsky, D. 2008. Metropolitan patenting, inventor agglomeration and social networks: A tale of two effects. Journal of Urban Economics 63:871–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., and Schrock, G. 2006. The distinctive city: Divergent patterns in growth, hierarchy and specialization. Urban Studies 43:1301–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., and Malmberg, A. 1999. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness, Cambridge. Journal of Economics 23:167–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurel, F., and Sédillot, B. 1999. A measure of the geographic concentration in French manufacturing industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics 29:575–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. 1990. The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B.; Van Haverbeke, W.; Duysters, G.; Gilsing, V.; and van den Oord, A. 2007. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy 36:1016–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• á hUallacháin, B. 1999. Patent places: Size matters. Journal of Regional Science 39:613–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• á hUallacháin, B., and Lee, D-S. 2011. Technological specialization and variety in urban invention. Regional Studies 45:67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• á hUallacháin, B., and Leslie, T. F. 2005. Spatial convergence and spillovers in American invention, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95:866–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• á hUallacháin, B., and Leslie, T. F. 2007. Rethinking the regional knowledge production function. Journal of Economic Geography 7:737–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• á hUallacháin, B., and Leslie, T. F. 2009. Postindustrial manufacturing in a Sunbelt metropolis: Where are factories located in Phoenix? Urban Geography 30:898–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• á hUallacháin, B., and Reid, N. 1991. The location and growth of business and professional services in American metropolitan areas, 1976–1986. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81:254–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owyang, M. T.; Piger, J. M.; Wall, H. J.; and Wheeler, C. H. 2008. The economic performance of cities: A Markov-switching approach. Journal of Urban Economics 64:538–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ponds, R., and van Oort, F. 2008. Spatial patterns of innovation in science based technologies in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 99:238–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponds R.; van Oort, F.; and Frenken, K. 2010. Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography 10:231–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 2003. The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies 37:549–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, J. M. 1998. Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12:127–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regional Plan Association. 2006. America 2050: A prospectus. Available online: http://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/focus/documents/SCD/America%202050%20Prospectus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Romer, P.M. 1994. The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:3–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. 1996. Regional motors of the global economy. Futures 28:391–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J., and Martin, R. 2010. The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3:24–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutthiphisal, D. 2006. Learning-by-producing and the geographic links between invention and production: Experience from the second industrial revolution. Journal of Economic History 66:992–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson P., and Fox-Kean M. 2005. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review 95:450–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3&section=2
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/mclsstc/mregions.htm
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/inv_prol.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Varga, A. 2000. Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science 40:289–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 1994. Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40:429–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar