Regional Entrepreneurial Heritage in a Socialist and a Postsocialist Economy

References

• Acs, Z. K., and Armington, C. 2004. Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity. Regional Studies 38:911–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. 1993. Small firms and entrepreneurship: An east-west perspective. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J.; Braunerhjelm, P.; Audretsch, D. B.; and Carlsson, B. 2009. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 32:15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, M., and Koster, S. 2011. Sources of persistence in regional startup rates—Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography 11:179–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrusz, G.; Harloe, M.; and Szelenyi, I. 1996. Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies, Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Aoyama,Y. 2009. Entrepreneurship and regional culture: The case of Hamamatsu and Kyoto, Japan. Regional Studies 43:495–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arauzo-Carod, J. M., and Teruel-Carizosa, M. 2005. An urban approach of rim entry: The effect of urban size. Growth and Change 36:508–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armington, C., and Acs, Z. 2002. The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies 36:33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D., and Fritsch, M. 1994. On the measurement of entry rates. Empirica 21:105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D., and Fritsch, M.. 2002. Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies 36:113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and Keilbach, M. 2004. Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies 38:949–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. 1990. Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy 98:893–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beesley, M. E., and Hamilton, R. T. 1984. Small firms’ seedbed role and the concept of turbulence. Journal of Industrial Economics 33:217–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beesley, M. E., and Hamilton, R. T.. 1994. Entry propensity, the supply of entrants and the spatial distribution of business units. Regional Studies 28:233–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benthien, B.; Känel, A.; and Weber, E. 1984. Main aspects of structural change in the northern regions of the GDR. GeoJournal 8:45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Berentsen, W. 1985. Regional planning in Central Europe: Austria, the Federal Republic of Germany, the German Democratic Republic, and Switzerland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 3:19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, S.; Van Schaik, T.; and Arts, W. 2006. Toward a unified Europe? Explaining regional differences in value patterns by economic development, cultural heritage and historical shocks. Regional Studies 40:317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and Frenken, K. 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6:273–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosma, N.; Van Stel, A.; and Suddle, K. 2008. The geography of new firm formation: Evidence from independent startups and new subsidiaries in the Netherlands. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 4:129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bosma, N.; Hessels, J.; van Schutjens, V.; Praag, M.; and Verheul, I. 2012. Entrepreneurship and role models. Journal of Economic Psychology 33:410–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, T., and Fornahl, D. 2008. Regional path-dependence in startup activity. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (08–12). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Urban and Regional Research Centre. Available online: http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg0812.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brezinski, H. 1987. The second economy in the GDR—Pragmatism is gaining ground. Studies in Comparative Communism 20:80–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezinski, H., and Fritsch, M. 1995. Transformation: The shocking German way. Moct-Most 5:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Burda. M. C., and Hunt, J. 2001. From reunification to economic integration: Productivity and the labor market in Eastern Germany. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:1–92.
   Google Scholar
• Carree, M. A.; van Stel, A.; Thurik, R.; and Wennekers, S. 2002. Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics 19:271–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilosi, A. 2001. Entrepreneurship and transition. Moct-Most 11:327–357.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, F., and Rudolph, H. 1990. Berufstätigenerhebung und der Datenspeicher “Gesellschaftliches Arbeitsvermögen” [The workforce census and the data base “Societal working capacity”]. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt—und Berufsforschung 23:511–518.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P. 2001. The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change 10:861–891.
   Google Scholar
• Fornahl, D. Fornahl D. and Brenner T., 38–57. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fotopoulos, G., and Spence, N. 2001. Regional variations of firm births, deaths and growth patterns in the UK, 1980–1991. Growth and Change 32:151–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. 2004. Entrepreneurship, entry and performance of new business compared in two growth regimes. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14:525–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and Brixy, U. 2004. The establishment file of the German social insurance statistics. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 124:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and Falck, O. 2007. New business formation by industry over space and time: A multidimensional analysis. Regional Studies 41:157–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. A. 1995. What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization 13:421–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guesnier, B. 1994. Regional variations in new firm formation in France. Regional Studies 28:347–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., and Schivardi, F. 2005. Learning to be an entrepreneur, Discussion Paper 5290, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B., and Ludwig, U. 1995. German unification and the “market adoption” hypothesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19:491–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenpflug, H., and Kowalke, H. 1991. Gedanken zur wirtschaftsräumlichen Gliederung der ehemaligen DDR und ihrer Anpassungsprobleme beim Übergang in die soziale Marktwirtschaft: Dargestellt am Beispiel der industriellen Dichtegebiete [Thoughts on the economic geography of the former GDR and its adjustment problems over the course of transition: The example of moderately congested industrialized areas]. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie 35:68–82.
   Google Scholar
• Häussermann, H. AndruszG., HarloeM., and SzelenyiI., 214–231. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. 2007. Negative binomial regression. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. J. 1967. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1:221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Kawka, R.Lentz S., 111–122. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lafuente, E.; Vaillant, Y.; and Rialp, J. 2007. Regional differences in the influence of role models: Comparing the entrepreneurial process of rural Catalonia. Regional Studies 41:779–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., and Woodruff, C. 2002. The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16:153–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelacci, C., and Silva, O. 2007. Why so many local entrepreneurs? Review of Economics and Statistics 89:615–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minniti, M. 2005. Entrepreneurship and network externalities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 57:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohs, G.; Grimm, F.; Heinzmann, J.; and Thuermer, R. 1984. The regional differentiation of the German Democratic Republic: Structure, dynamics, development. GeoJournal 8:7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Piasecki B., and Rogut, A. 1993. Self regulation of the SME sector at a more advanced stage of transformation. Paper presented to the twentieth annual conference of E. A. R. I. E., Tel Aviv, September.
   Google Scholar
• Pickel, A. 1992. Radical transitions: The survival and revival of entrepreneurship in the GDR. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pilleul-Arp, A. 2005. VEB-GmbH: Vatis ehemaliger Betrieb-geklaut mit besonderer Höflichkeit: Klein- und Mittelunternehmer in der DDR: Lebensläufe zwischen 1949 und 1990 im Vergleich [Daddy’s former firm—stolen with special politeness: Small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in the GDR; comparison of life careers between 1949 and 1990]. Historical Social Research 30:160–180.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, P.; Miller, B.; and Maki, W. R. 1995. Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics 7:389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, P.; Storey, D. J.; and Westhead, P. 1994. Cross-national comparisons of the variation in the new firm formation rates. Regional Studies 28:443–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, H. 1990. Beschäftigungsstrukturen in der DDR vor der Wende: eine Typisierung nach Kreisen und Arbeitsämtern [Employment structures in the GDR before re-unification: A typology for districts and job center districts]. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung 23:474–503.
   Google Scholar
• Scherf, K.; Schmidt, H.; and Scholz, D. 1984. The southern agglomeration zone of the GDR: Regional structure and development. GeoJournal 8:33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Smallbone, D., and Welter, F. 2001. The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics 16:249–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, E. 2009. Entrepreneurship, evolution and geography. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (09–13). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Urban and Regional Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Yearbook of the GDR. (1958, 1990). Berlin: Staatsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. 2009. Regional implications of entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 5:211–340.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, R. 2000. Constructing socialism: Technology and change in East Germany, 1945–1990. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, D. J. 1991. The birth of new firms—Does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics 3:161–178.
   Google Scholar
• Tamasy, C. 2006. Determinants of regional entrepreneurship dynamics in contemporary Germany: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Regional Studies 40:365–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. BrezinskiH. and FritschM., 227–232. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Tipton, F. B. 1974. Farm labour and power politics: Germany, 1850–1914. Journal of Economic History 34:951–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton, F. B.. 1976. Regional variations in the economic development of Germany during the nineteenth century. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verheul, I.; Wennekers, S.; Audretsch, D. B.; and Thurik, R. 2001. An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship. Discussion Paper No. TI 2001-030/3. Tinbergen Institute for Economic Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., and Sternberg, R. 2004. Startup activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies form German micro data. Annals of Regional Science 38:219–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48:817–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, T. 1992. From division to unification: Regional dimensions of economic change in Germany. Geography 77:244–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimm, A., and Bräuniger, J. 1984. The agglomeration of the GDR capital, Berlin: A survey of its economic geography. GeoJournal 8:23–31.
   Google Scholar