Governance Systems in Family SMEs: The Substitution Effects between Family Councils and Corporate Governance Mechanisms

References

• Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing (1988). “Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two‐Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin 103, 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., and D. M. Reeb (2003). “Founding‐Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500,” The Journal of Finance 58(3), 1301–1328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., and T. S. Overton (1977). “Estimating Non‐Response Bias in Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research 14, 396–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronoff, C. E., and J. L. Ward (1992). “The Critical Value of Stewardship,” Nation's Business 49, 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Astrachan, J. H., and M. C. Shanker (2003). “Family Businesses' Contribution to the US Economy: A Closer Look,” Family Business Review XVI(3), 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, M., and P. Sharma (2007). “Should the CEO Also Be Chair of the Board? An Empirical Examination of Family‐Controlled Public Firms,” Family Business Review XX(2), 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, N., and M. Waldman (1990). “The Rotten Kid Theorem Meets the Samaritan Dilemma,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 155–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunninge, O., M. Nordqvist, and J. Wiklund (2007). “Corporate Governance and Strategic Change in SMEs: The Effects of Ownership, Board Composition and Top Management Teams,” Small Business Economics 29(3), 295–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1975). “The Samaritan's Dilemma,” in Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory. Ed. E. S. Phelps. New York: Russell Sage Foundations, 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Carlock, R. S., and J. L. Ward (2001). Strategic Planning for the Family Business. Parallel Planning to Unify the Family and the Business. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldi, R., and M. S. Wortman (1984). “Boards of Directors in Small Corporations: An Untapped Resource,” American Journal of Small Business IX(2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Charkham, J. P. (1994). Keeping Good Company. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Charkham, J. P., and A. Simpson (1999). Fair Shares. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J. J., J. H. Chua, and R. A. Litz (2004). “Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non‐Family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28(4), 335–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, J. H., J. J. Chrisman, and P. Sharma (2003). “Succession and Nonsuccession Concerns of Family Firms and Agency Relationships with Nonfamily Managers,” Family Business Review XVI(2), 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, G. (1995). “Patterns of Development of Family Businesses in Italy,” Family Business Review VIII(4), 255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, G., and D. Montemerlo (1999). “Ownership, Governance and Management Issues in Small and Medium Sized Family Businesses: A Comparison of Italy and the United States,” Family Business Review XII(4), 361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, G., and D. Montemerlo (2003). “Leading Family Firms: A Double Challenge,” in New Frontiers in Family Business Research: The Leadership Challenge. Eds. P. Z. Poutzioris and L. Steier. Manchester and Edmonton: Manchester Business NetworkSchool and Alberta School of Business, 432–449.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, G., and C. Salvato (2004). “The Board of Directors in Family Firms: One Size Fits All?” Family Business Review XVII(2), 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, G., and S. Tomaselli (1996). “Boards of Directors in Italian Family Businesses,” Family Business Review IX(4), 403–421.
   Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., and M. J. Dollinger (1993). “Alternative Methodologies for Identifying Family‐ Versus Non‐Family‐Managed Businesses,” Journal of Small Business Management 2(31), 79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L., and J. H. Davis (1991). “Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns,” Australian Journal of Management 16, 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, W. G. Jr (2006). “Examining the ‘Family Effect’ on Firm Performance,” Family Business Review XIX(3), 253–273.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,” Academy of Management Review 14, 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. (1980). “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Political Economy 88, 288–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E., and M. Jensen (1983). “Separation of Ownership and Control,” Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayol, H. (1949). General and Industrial Management. London: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Fiegener, M., M. K. Brown, and D. R. Derux (2000). “CEO Stakes and Board Composition in Small Private Firms,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 24, 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fiegener, M. K. (2005). “Determinants of Board Participation in the Strategic Decisions of Small Corporations,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29(5), 627–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., and D. C. Hambrick (1996). Strategic Leadership. Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, D. P., and F. J. Milliken (1999). “Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision‐Making Groups,” Academy of Management Review 24, 489–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. Larcker (1981). “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, J., and H. Winlund (2000). “Board of Directors in Small and Medium Sized Industrial Firms: Examining the Effects of the Board's Working Style on Board Task Performance,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12, 311–330.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, M., and D. Kenyon (2004). “The Importance of Family and Business Governance,” in Family Business: Key Issues. Eds. D. Kenyon and J. L. Ward. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan, 102–126.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, M. A., G. Corbetta, K. Cappuyins, W. G. Dyer Jr., D. Montemerlo, and S. Tomaselli (2001). Success as a Function of Love, Trust and Freedom in Family Businesses. Barcelona: Ediciones IESE.
   Google Scholar
• Gersick, K. E., J. A. Davis, I. Lansberg, and M. Mccollon hampton (1997). Generation to Generation. Life Cycles of the Family Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giacomelli, S., and S. Trento (2005). “Proprietà, controllo e trasferimenti nelle imprese italiane. Cosa è cambiato nel decennio 1993–2003,” Working Paper No. 550. Rome: Bank of Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Gnan, L., and D. Montemerlo (2006). “Family–Firm Relations in Italian SMEs: Ownership and Governance Issues in A Double‐Fold Theoretical Perspective,” in Handbook of Research on Family Business. Eds. P. Z. Poutziouris, K. Smyrnios, and S. B. Klein. Northampton, MA: Elgar‐IFERA, 501–516.
   Google Scholar
• Gnan, L., and D. Montemerlo (2008). Le PMI familiari in Italia tra tradizione e novità. I risultati di una ricerca. Milan: EGEA.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez‐mejia, L. R., M. Nuňez‐nickel, and I. Gutierrez (2001). “The Role of Family Ties in Agency Contracts,” Academy of Management Journal 44, 81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubitta, P., and M. Gianecchini (2002). “Governance and Flexibility in Family Owned SMEs,” Family Business Review XV(4), 277–297.
   Google Scholar
• Habbershon, T. G., and J. H. Astrachan (1997). “Perceptions Are Reality: How Family Meetings Lead to Collective Action,” Family Business Review X(1), 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. S. Jr (1999). “What Can the Family Contribute to the Business? Examining Contractual Relationships,” Family Business Review XII(1), 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel (2003). “Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives,” Academy of Management Review 28(3), 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., A. A. J. Cannella, and R. L. Paetzold (2000). “The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change,” Journal of Management Studies 37(2), 235–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. P., and M. Bentler (1999). “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huse, M. (2000). “Boards of Directors in SMEs: A Review and Research Agenda,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12, 271–290.
   Google Scholar
• Huse, M. (2003). “Renewing Management and Governance: New Paradigms of Governance?” Journal of Management and Governance 7, 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (2004). Struttura e dimensione delle imprese—Archivio statistico delle imprese attive. Rome: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Ufficio di Comunicazione.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (1998). “Self‐Interest, Altruism, Incentives, and Agency,” in Foundations of Organizational Strategy. Ed. M. C. Jensen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 48–62.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Capital Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B., and M. Huse (2000). “Recruiting Outside Board Members in the Small Family Business: An Ideological Challenge,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12, 353–378.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G., and K. Scholes (2002). Exploring Corporate Strategy, 6th ed. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. L., C. M. Daily, and A. E. Ellstrand (1996). “Boards of Directors: A Review and a Research Agenda,” Journal of Management 22, 409–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. R. (1983). “Transaction Costs, Property Rights, and Organizational Culture: An Exchange Perspective,” Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 454–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, K., and L. B. Barnes (1998). “The Trust Catalyst in Family‐Owned Businesses,” Family Business Review XI(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lank, A. G., and J. L. Ward (2000). “Governing the Business‐Owning Family,” FBN Newsletter 26, 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lansberg, I. (1999). Succeeding Generations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcconaughy, D. L. (2000). “Family CEOs vs. Nonfamily CEOs in the Family‐Controlled Firm: An Examination of the Level and Sensitivity of Pay to Performance,” Family Business Review 13(2), 120–131.
   Google Scholar
• Mcnulty, T., and A. Pettigrew (1999). “Strategists on the Board,” Organization Studies 20(1), 48–74.
   Google Scholar
• Melin, L., and M. Nordqvist (2000). “Corporate Governance Processes in Family Firms. The Role of Influential Actors and the Strategic Arena,” ICSB World Conference Proceedings 86–94.
   Google Scholar
• Melin, L., and M. Nordqvist (2007). “The Reflexive Dynamics of Institutionalization: The Case of the Family Business,” Strategic Organization 5(3), 321–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., and I. Le breton‐miller (2006). “Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities,” Family Business Review 19, 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichilli, A., G. Corbetta, and I. C. Macmillan (2010). “Top Management Teams in Family Controlled Companies: ‘Familiness,’ ‘Faultlines,’ and Their Impact on Financial Performance,” Journal of Management Studies 47(2), 205–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morck, R., A. Schleifer, and R. W. Vishny (1988). “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustakallio, M. A., and E. Autio (2001). “Effects of Formal and Social Controls on Strategic Decision Making in Family Firms,” in The Role of Family in Family Business. Eds. G. Corbetta and D. Montemerlo. Milan: EGEA, 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, G. J., and G. C. Kiel (2004). “A Framework for Diagnosing Board Effectiveness,” Corporate Governance 12(4), 442–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieper, T. M., S. B. Klein, and P. Jaskiewicz (2008). “The Impact of Goal Alignment on Board Existence and Top Management Team Composition: Evidence from Family‐Influenced Businesses,” Journal of Small Business Management 46(3), 372–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., and T. Zenger (2002). “Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements?” Strategic Management Journal 23, 707–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, C. (2002). “Towards A Stewardship Theory of the Family Firm,” in The Future of Family Business. Values and Social Responsibility. Eds. M. Koiranen and N. Karlsson. Family Business Network 2002 Research Forum Proceedings, Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä, 121–145.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. S., M. H. Lubatkin, R. M. Dino, and A. K. Bucholtz (2001). “Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence,” Organization Science 12, 99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. S., M. H. Lubatkin, and R. M. Dino (2003). “Exploring the Agency Consequences of Ownership Dispersion among Private Family Firms,” Academy of Management Journal 46, 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. (2004). “An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for Future,” Family Business Review XVII(1), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W. H., and F. J. Milliken (1988). “Executives' Perceptual Filters: What They Notice and How They Make Sense,” in The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers. Ed. D. Hambrick. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 35–65.
   Google Scholar
• Suàre, K. C., and D. J. Santana‐martìn (2004). “Governance in Spanish Family Business,” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 10(1/2), 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• Van den heuvel, J., A. Van gils, and W. Voordeckers (2006). “Board Roles in Small and Medium‐Sized Family Businesses: Performance and Importance,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 14(5), 467–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalonga, B., and R. Amit (2006). “How Do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect Firm Value?” Journal of Financial Economics 80, 385–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. L. (1987). Keeping the Family Business Healthy. How to Plan for Continuing Growth, Profitability, and Family Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. L. (1991). Creating Effective Boards for Private Enterprises. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. L. (2004). Perpetuating the Family Business. 50 Lessons Learned from Long‐Lasting Successful Families in Business. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce (1989). “Board of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrated Model,” Journal of Management 15, 291–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., D. O. Neubaum, and M. Huse (2000). “Entrepreneurship in Medium Size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems,” Journal of Management 26, 947–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., H. Bang, H. Wang, and P. E. Pfeifer (2007). “On the Equivalence of Some Medical Cost Estimators with Censored Data,” Statistics in Medicine 26, 4520–4530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar