The Board's Demography—Firm Performance Relationship Revisited: A Bayesian Approach

References

• Anderson, A. R., S. L. Jack, and S. D. Dodd (2005). “The Role of Family Members in Entrepreneurial Networks: Beyond the Boundaries of the Family Firm,” Family Business Review 18(2), 135–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and E. Lehmann (2006). “Entrepreneurial Access and Absorption of Knowledge Spillovers: Strategic Board and Managerial Composition for Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Small Business Management 44(2), 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bammens, Y., W. Voordeckers, and A. Van Gils (2008). “Boards of Directors in Family Firms: A Generational Perspective,” Small Business Economics 31(2), 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bammens, Y., W. Voordeckers, and A. Van Gils (2011). “Boards of Directors in Family Businesses: A Literature Review and Research Agenda,” International Journal of Management Reviews 13(2), 134–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baysinger, B. D., and R. E. Hoskisson (1990). “The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy,” Academy of Management Review 15(1), 72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennedsen, M., H. C. Kongsted, and K. M. Nielsen (2008). “The Causal Effect of Board Size in the Performance of Small and Medium–Sized Firms,” Journal of Banking and Finance 32(6), 1089–1109.
   Google Scholar
• Brenes, E. R., K. Madrigal, and B. Requena (2011). “Corporate Governance and Family Business Performance,” Journal of Business Research 64(3), 280–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K., and A. Mínguez‐vera, (2008). “Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance,” Journal of Business Ethics 83(3), 435–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, J. A., D. Finegold, and E. E. Lawler III (1998). “Appraising Boardroom Performance,” Harvard Business Review 76(1), 136–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, C. C., L. R. Gómez‐mejia, and M. Beccerra (2010). “Perceptions of Benevolence and the Design of Agency Contracts: CEO‐TMT Relationships in Family Firms,” Academy of Management Journal 53(1), 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., D. R. Dalton, and A. A. Cannella (2003). “Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data,” Academy of Management Review 28(3), 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, J. L. Johnson, and A. E. Ellstrand (1999). “Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta‐Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal 42(6), 674–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., and B. Latané (1968). “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8(4), 377–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pietra, R., C. A. Grambovas, I. Raonic, and A. Riccaboni (2008). “The Effects of Board Size and ‘Busy’ Directors on the Market Value of Italian Companies,” Journal of Management and Governance 12(1), 73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, G. W. (2006). “Examining the ‘Family Effect’ on Firm Performance,” Family Business Review 19(4), 253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, D. P., and F. J. Milliken (1999). “Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision‐Making Groups,” Academy of Management Review 24(3), 489–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, I. (2000). “An Application of Maximum Entropy Estimation: The Demand for Meat in the United Kingdom,” Applied Economics 32(1), 45–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, J., and H. Winlund (2000). “Boards of Directors in Small and Medium‐Sized Industrial Firms: Examining the Effects of the Board's Working Style on Board Task Performance,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12(4), 311–330.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, J. (2007). “Correlates of Board Empowerment in Small Companies,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 31(5), 687–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, J., and M. Huse (2004). “Context, Behavior, and Evolution. Challenges in Research on Boards and Governance,” International Studies of Management and Organization 34(2), 11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Golden‐biddle, K., and H. Rao (1997). “Breaches in the Boardroom: Organizational Identity and Conflicts of Commitment in a Nonprofit Organization,” Organization Science 8(6), 593–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, H. R. (2008). “A Behavioral Theory of Firm Growth: Sequential Attention to Size and Performance Goals,” Academy of Management Journal 51(3), 476–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundei, J., and T. Talaulicar (2002). “Company Law and Corporate Governance of Start‐ups in Germany: Legal Stipulations, Managerial Requirements, and Modification Strategies,” Journal of Management and Governance 6(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Habbershon, T. G., and M. L. Williams (1999). “A Resource‐Based Framework for Assessing Strategic Advantages of Family Firms,” Family Business Review 12(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. H., L. T. Perry, and C. S. Reese (2004). “A Bayesian Operationalization of the Resource‐Based View,” Strategic Management Journal 25(13), 1279–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D., and C. Helfat (1997). “Specificity of CEO Human Capital and Compensation,” Strategic Management Journal 18(11), 895–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huse, M. (2005). “Accountability and Creating Accountability: A Framework for Exploring Behavioural Perspectives of Corporate Governance,” British Journal of Management 16(1), 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huse, M. (2007). Boards, Governance and Value Creation: The Human Side of Corporate Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B., and M. Huse (2000). “Recruiting Outside Board Members in the Small Family Business: An Ideological Challenge,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal 12(4), 353–378.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. L., C. M. Daily, and A. E. Ellstrand (1996). “Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of Management 22(3), 409–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, W. Q., and C. P. Zeithaml (1992). “Institutional and Strategic Choice Perspectives on Board Involvement in the Strategic Decision Process,” Academy of Management Journal 35(4), 766–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J. Jr., and T. B. Palmer (1999). “Strategic Responses to Poor Organizational Performance: A Test of Competing Perspectives,” Journal of Management 25(4), 683–706.
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell, R. E., F. W. Kellermanns, and K. A. Eddleston (2012). “Harmony, Justice, Confusion, and Conflict in Family Firms: Implications for Ethical Climate and the ‘Fredo Effect’,” Journal of Business Ethics 106(4), 503–517.
   Google Scholar
• Kiel, G. C., and G. J. Nicholson (2003). “Board Composition and Corporate Performance: How the Australian Experience Informs Contrasting Theories of Corporate Governance,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 11(3), 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel, G. C., G. J. Nicholson, and M. A. Barclay (2004). Board, Director and CEO Evaluation. Sydney: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, J., and V. Molly, (2011). Het economische belang van familiebedrijven in België. Brussels: FBNet Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Latané, B., K. Williams, and S. Harkins (1979). “Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(6), 822–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc, R., and M. S. Schwartz (2007). “The Black Box of Board Process: Gaining Access to a Difficult Subject,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(5), 843–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichilli, A., J. Gabrielsson, and M. Huse (2007). “Board Evaluations: Making a Fit Between the Purpose and the System,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(4), 609–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichilli, A., A. Zattoni, and F. Zona (2009). “Making Boards Effective: An Empirical Examination of Board Task Performance,” British Journal of Management 20(1), 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichilli, A., A. Zattoni, S. Nielsen, and M. Huse (2012). “Board Task Performance: An Exploration of Micro‐ and Macro‐level Determinants of Board Effectiveness,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 33(2), 193–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, L. T., M. H. Hansen, C. S. Reese, and G. Pesci (2005). “Diversification and Focus: A Bayesian Application of the Resource‐based View,” Schmalenbach Business Review 57(4), 304–319.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1972). “Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment,” Administrative Science Quarterly 17(2), 218–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstein, S., and J. Wyatt (1990). “Outside Directors, Board Independence, and Shareholder Wealth,” Journal of Financial Economics 26(2), 175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, J., and S. Sarkar (2009). “Multiple Board Appointments and Firm Performance in Emerging Economies: Evidence from India,” Pacific‐Basin Finance Journal 17(2), 271–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. S., M. H. Lubatkin, R. N. Dino, and A. K. Buchholtz (2001). “Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence,” Organization Science 12(2), 99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeas, N. (1999). “Board Meeting Frequency and Firm Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics 53(1), 113–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeas, N. (2003). “Length of Board Tenure and Outside Director Independence,” Journal Of Business Finance and Accounting 30(7/8), 1043–1064.
   Google Scholar
• Vallejo, M. C., and D. Langa (2010). “Effects of Family Socialization in the Organizational Commitment of the Family Firms from the Moral Economy Perspective,” Journal of Business Ethics 96(1), 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• van Den heuvel, J., A. Van Gils, and W. Voordeckers (2006). “Board Roles in Small and Medium‐Sized Family Businesses: Performance and Importance,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 14(5), 467–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ees, H., G. van der Laan, and T. J. B. M. Postma (2008). “Effective Board Behavior in The Netherlands,” European Management Journal 26(2), 84–93.
   Google Scholar
• van Ees, H., J. Gabrielsson, and M. Huse (2009). “Toward a Behavioral Theory of Boards and Corporate Governance,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 17(3), 307–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voordeckers, W., A. Van Gils, and J. van Den heuvel (2007). “Board Composition in Small and Medium‐Sized Family Firms,” Journal of Small Business Management 45(1), 137–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, J., and J.C. Pape (1999). “A Taxonomy of Systems of Corporate Governance,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 7(2), 152–166.
   Google Scholar
• Wellalage, N., and S. Locke, (in press). “Women on Board, Firm Financial Performance and Agency Costs,” Asian Journal Of Business Ethics, doi 10.1007/s13520‐012‐0020‐x.
   Google Scholar
• Westhead, P., and C. Howard (2007). “Types of Private Family Firms: An Exploratory Conceptual and Empirical Analysis,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 19(5), 405–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., and M. K. Bednar (2005). “Pluralistic Ignorance in Corporate Boards and Firm's Strategic Persistence in Response to Low Firm Performance,” Administrative Science Quarterly 50(2), 262–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce (1989). “Board of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model,” Journal of Management 15(2), 291–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., D. O. Neubaum, and M. Huse (2000). “Entrepreneurship in Medium‐Sized Firms: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems,” Journal of Management 26(5), 947–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zona, F., and A. Zattoni (2007). “Beyond the Black Box of Demography: Board Processes and Task Effectiveness Within Italian Family Firms,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(5), 852–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar