How Best to Communicate Intangible Resources on Websites to Inform Corporate‐Growth Reputation of Small Entrepreneurial Businesses

References

• Abeysekera, I. (2014). “Secondary Analysis of Two Environmental Practices Studies. Do Empirical Variables Represent Expressed Theoretical Constructs?,” Journal of Cleaner Production 79, 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. A., W. Y. Hill, and C. B. Roberts (1998). “Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behaviour?,” British Accounting Review 30, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C., and J. Frost (2004). “The Development of Corporate Web‐Sites and Implications for Ethical, Social, and Environmental Reporting Through These Media,” Research monograph, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh, H., K. M. Johnstone, and T. D. Warfield (1999). “Corporate Reporting on the Internet,” Accounting Horizons September, 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, S. B. (1989). “Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation,” The Academy of Management Review 14(4), 496–515.”
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (2001). “Is the Resource‐Based ‘View’ a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management? Yes,” The Academy of Management Review 26(1), 41–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerra, M. (2008). “A Resource‐Based Analysis of the Conditions for the Emergence of Profits,” Journal of Management 34(6), 1110–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Bocatto, E., C. Gispert, and J. Rialp (2010). “Family‐Owned Business Succession: The Influence of Pre‐Performance in the Nomination of Family and Non‐Family Members: Evidence from Spanish Firms,” Journal of Small Business Management 48(4), 497–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid (2000). “Balancing Act: How to Capture Knowledge without Killing It,” Harvard Business Review May–June, 73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L., M. Hughes, and M. Yin (2014). “The Relationship between Resource Acquisition Methods and Firm Performance in Chinese New Ventures: The Intermediate Effect of Learning Capability,” Journal of Small Business Management 52(3), 365–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S. M., and J. M. Dukerich (1998). “Corporate Responses to Changes in Reputation,” Corporate Reputation Review 1, 250–270.
   Google Scholar
• Clackworthy, M. A., and M. J. Jones (2006). “Differential Patterns of Textual Characteristics and Company Performance in the Chairman's Statement,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19(4), 493–511.
   Google Scholar
• Connie, T. F., and G. P. Madden (1986). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Value,” in Handbook of Business Strategy 1986/1987 Yearbook. Ed. W. D. Guth. New York: Warrer, Gorham & Lamont.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, T. E. (1992). “The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing and Industry Type on Disclosure in the Annual Reports of Japanese Listed Companies,” Accounting and Business Research 22, 229–237.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, J. B., C. Dibrell, and P. S. Davis (2008). “Leveraging Family‐Based Identity to Enhance Firm Competitiveness and Performance in Family Business,” Journal of Small Business Management 46(3), 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G., R. Chun, R. V. Da silva, and S. Roper (2003). Corporate Reputation and Competitiveness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, J. (2011). “Barthesian Perspectives on Accounting Communication and Visual Images of Professional Accountancy,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 24(2), 250–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, J. (2014). “Visual Rhetoric and the Case of Intellectual Capital,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 39, 20–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Casto, G. M., J. E. N. Lopez, and P. L. Saez (2006). “Business and Social Reputation: Exploring the Concept and Main Dimensions of Corporate Reputation,” Journal of Business Ethics 63(4), 361–370.
   Google Scholar
• Flint‐hartle, S., and A. de Bruin (2010). “Franchising Success: Insights from Real Estate Brokerage,” International Small Business Journal 29(1), 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C., and C. van Riel (2003). “The Reputational Landscape,” in Revealing the Corporation: Perspectives on Identity, Image, Reputation, Corporate Branding, and Corporate‐Level Marketing. Ed. J. Balmer and S. Greyser. London: Routledge, 223–233.
   Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C., and M. Shanley (1990). “What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy,” Academy of Management Journal 33, 233–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, R. J. (1982). “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations,” American Journal of Political Science 26(4), 797–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallhofer, S., and J. Haslam (2006). “Online Reporting: Accounting in Cybersociety,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19(5), 625–630.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., K. Lukka, and J. Mouritsen (1998). “Institutionalise Justification of Corporate Action: Internationalisation and the EU in Corporate Reports,” Scandinavian Journal of Management 14(4), 433–458.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, O. F., D. L. Flesher, and R. E. Jordan (1996). “Pictures and the Bottom Line: The Television Epistemiology of U.S. Annual Reports,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 21(1), 57–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, K. L., and R. Steiner (2001). “Hurdles of Access and Benefits of Internet Communication,” Communication Research Reports 18(4), 399–407.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, R. W., and K. B. Frazier (1980). “Environmental Performance and Corporate Disclosure,” Journal of Accounting Research 18(2), Autumn, 614–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., and R. Turrisi (2003). Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–72. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson‐laird, P. N. (1996). “Images, Models, and Propositional Representations,” in Models of Visuospatial Cognition. Ed. M. Marschark. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., T. Alabester, and K. Hetherington (2000). “Internet‐Based Environmental Reporting,” GMII Summer, 69–90.
   Google Scholar
• Keim, G. (1978). “Managerial Behaviour and the Social Responsibilities Debate: An Assessment of the Enlightened Self‐Interest Model,” Academy of Management Journal 21, 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, P., and C. Hope (1992). “Environmental Disclosure in U.K. Company Annual Reports,” Management Studies Research Paper Number 16/92, Management Studies Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, June.
   Google Scholar
• Lado, A. A., and M. C. Wilson (1994). “Human Resource Systems and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Competency‐Based Perspective,” Academy of Management Review 19(4), 699–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplume, A. O., K. Sonpar, and R. A. Litz (2008). “Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us,” Journal of Management 34(6), 1152–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, B., and P. Zarowin (1999). “The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them,” Journal of Accounting Research 37(2), 353–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, J., J. R. Kickul, and H. Ma (2009). “Organizational Dynamic Capability and Innovation: An Empirical Examination of Internet Firms,” Journal of Small Business Management 47(3), 263–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonial, S. C., and R. E. Carter (2015). “The Impact of Organisational Orientations on Medium and Small Firm Performance: A Resource‐Based Perspective,” Journal of Small Business Management 53(1), 94–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., and I. Abeysekera (2014). “Social and Environmental Disclosure by Chinese Firms.” New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mcguire, J. B., T. Schneeweis, and B. Branch (1990). “Perceptions of Firm Quality: A Cause or Result of Firm Performance,” Journal of Management 16(1), 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkl‐davies, D. M., N. M. Brennan, and S. J. Mcleay (2011). “Impression Management and Retrospective Sense‐Making in Corporate Narratives,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 24(3), 315–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, M. J., and R. W. Adler (1999). “Exploring the Reliability of Social Disclosures Content Analysis,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 12(2), 237–256.
   Google Scholar
• Miniwatts Marketing Group (2008). “Internet Usage and Population Statistics for Oceania.” Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats6.htm [accessed July 13, 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, J., H. T. Larsen, and P. N. D. Bukh (2001). “Intellectual Capital and the ‘Capable Firm’: Narrating, Visualising and Numbering for Managing Knowledge,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 26, 735–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paisey, C., and N. J. Paisey (2006). “Mobilising Internet to Promote a More Enabling Accounting for Occupational Pension Schemes,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19(5), 719–758.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1981). “Management as Symbolic Action: The Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms,” in Research in Organizational Behaviour 3. Ed. B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings. New York: JAI Press, 151
   Google Scholar
• Pirchegger, B., and A. Wagenhofer (1999). “Financial Information on the Internet: A Survey of the Homepages of Austrian Companies,” The European Accounting Review 8(2), 383–395.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2001). “Imagining, Measuring and Managing Intangibles,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 26(7/8), 691–693.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, L. E., and H. Sapienza (1990). “Stakeholder Management and Corporate Performance,” Journal of Behavioral Economics 19, 361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. W. (1992). “Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 7, 595–612.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, L. (2001). “Positive Response Action: The Ultimate Goal of Website Communication,” Journal of Communication Management 6(1), 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Shimojima, A. (1996). “Operational Constraints in Diagrammatic Reasoning,” in Logical Reasoning with Diagrams. Ed. G. Allwein and J. Barwise. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sikka, P. (2006). “The Internet and Possibilities for Counter Accounts: Some Reflections,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19(5), 759–769.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., and R. J. Taffler (2000). “The Chairman's Statement: A Content Analysis of Discretionary Narrative Disclosures,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 13(5), 624–647.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models,” Sociological Methodology 13, 290–312.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol, M. G., and G. Farrell (1988). “Corporate Reputation: A Function of Relative Size or Financial Performance?,” Review of Business and Economic Research 24, 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, M., and T. S. H. Teo (1998). “Factors Influencing the Adoption of the Internet,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2 (3), Available at: http://www.gvsu.edu/business/ijec/. [accessed May 8, 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. S. H., M. Tan, and W. K. Buk (1997). “A Contingency Model of Internet Adoption in Singapore,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2(2), Available at: http://www.gvsu.edu/business/ijec/ [accessed May 8, 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Toms, J. S. (2002). “Firm Resources, Quality Signals and the Determinants of Corporate Environmental Reputation: Some UK Evidence,” The British Accounting Review 34, 257–282.
   Google Scholar
• Trewin, D. (2002). Small Businesses in Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Whitson, T. L., and L. Davis (2001). “Best Practices in Electronic Government: Comprehensive Electronic Information Dissemination for Science and Technology,” Government Information Quarterly 18(2), 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar