773
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does using latest technologies impact new venture innovation? A contingency-based view of institutional environments

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 852-886 | Published online: 15 Jan 2020

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41, 757–774. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9
  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43, 476–494. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
  • Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions. Small Business Economics, 31, 219–234. doi:10.1007/s11187-008-9135-9
  • Acs, Z. J., & Gifford, S. (1996). Innovation of entrepreneurial firms. Small Business Economics, 8, 203–218. doi:10.1007/BF00388648
  • Acs, Z. J., & Sanders, M. 2008. Intellectual property rights and the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Jena Economic Research Papers.
  • Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 306–333. doi:10.1002/smj.v31:3
  • Álvarez, C., Urbano, D., & Amorós, J. E. (2014). GEM research: Achievements and challenges. Small Business Economics, 42, 445–465. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9517-5
  • Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 465–476. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.001
  • Anokhin, S., & Wincent, J. (2012). Start-up rates and innovation: A cross-country examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 41–60. doi:10.1057/jibs.2011.47
  • Aparicio, S., Urbano, D., & Audretsch, D. (2016). Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 45–61. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.006
  • Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24, 233–247. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-1984-x
  • Arvanitis, S., Loukis, E., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2013). The effect of soft ICT capital on innovation performance of greek firms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26, 679–701. doi:10.1108/JEIM-07-2013-0048
  • Autio, E., & Acs, Z. (2010). Intellectual property protection and the formation of entrepreneurial growth aspirations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 234–251. doi:10.1002/sej.v4:3
  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43, 1097–1108. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
  • Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625. doi:10.1177/014920630102700601
  • Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (2007). How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1721–1758. doi:10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1721
  • Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 3–22. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-X
  • Baumol, W. J., & Strom, R. J. (2007). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 233–237. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1932-443X
  • Bayo-Moriones, A., Billón, M., & Lera-López, F. (2013). Perceived performance effects of ICT in manufacturing SMEs. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 113, 117–135. doi:10.1108/02635571311289700
  • Ben Youssef, B., Boubaker, S., & Omri, A. (2018). Entrepreneurship and sustainability: The need for innovative and institutional solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 232–241. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.003
  • Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24, 169–196. doi:10.2307/3250983
  • Boothby, D., Dufour, A., & Tang, J. (2010). Technology adoption, training and productivity performance. Research Policy, 39, 650–661. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.011
  • Boudreaux, C. J., Nikolaev, B. N., & Klein, P. (2019). Socio-cognitive traits and entrepreneurship: The moderating role of economic institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 34, 178–196. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.003
  • Bowen, H. P., & De Clercq, D. (2008). Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 747–767. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400343
  • Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1996). Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1, 75–76.
  • Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R. T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied approach. Duxbury, Belmont, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
  • Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2014). Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy. Technovation, 34, 773–784. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.013
  • Bruque, S., & Moyano, J. (2007). Organisational determinants of information technology adoption and implementation in SMEs: The case of family and cooperative firms. Technovation, 27, 241–253. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2006.12.003
  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 421–440. doi:10.1111/etap.2010.34.issue-3
  • Busenitz, L. W., Gómez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 994–1003.
  • Bygrave, W., & Minniti, M. (2000). The social dynamics of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24, 25–36. doi:10.1177/104225870002400302
  • Capelleras, J.-L., Mole, K. F., Greene, F. J., & Storey, D. J. (2007). Do more heavily regulated economies have poorer performing new ventures? Evidence from Britain and Spain. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 688–704. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400340
  • Chang, H. H., & Wong, K. H. (2010). Adoption of e-procurement and participation of e-marketplace on firm performance: trust as a moderator. Information and Management, 47, 262–270. doi:10.1016/j.im.2010.05.002
  • Chen, Y., & Puttitanun, T. (2005). Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78, 474–493. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.11.005
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Correa, P. G., Fernandes, A. M., & Uregian, C. J. (2010). Technology Adoption and the Investment Climate: Firm-Level Evidence for Eastern Europe and Central Asia. The World Bank Economic Review, 24, 121–147. doi:10.1093/wber/lhp021
  • Davis-Sramek, B., Germain, R., & Iyer, K. (2010). Supply chain technology: The role of environment in predicting performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 42–55. doi:10.1007/s11747-009-0137-1
  • De Clercq, D., Danis, W. M., & Dakhli, M. (2010). The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. International Business Review, 19, 85–101. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.09.002
  • De Clercq, D., Lim, D. S. K., & Oh, C. H. (2013). Individual-level resources and new business activity: The contingent role of institutional context. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37, 303–330.
  • Dewett, T., & Jones, G. R. (2001). The role of information technology in the organization: A review, model, and assessment. Journal of Management, 27, 313–346. doi:10.1177/014920630102700306
  • Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy, 41, 1283–1295. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.021
  • Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship (2017). Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 41 1029–1055.
  • Edquist, H., & Henrekson, M. (2017). Swedish lessons: How important are ICT and R&D to economic growth? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 42, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2017.05.004
  • Engelstätter, B., & Sarbu, M. (2013). Does enterprise software matter for service innovation? Standardization versus customization. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22, 412–429. doi:10.1080/10438599.2012.759705
  • Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2013). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 564–580. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.001
  • Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30, 1019–1039. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9
  • Gallivan, M., & Srite, M. (2005). Information technology and culture: Identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture. Information and Organization, 15, 295–338. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2005.02.005
  • García-Ramos, C., Gonzalez-Alvarez, N., & Nieto, M. (2017). Institutional framework and entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24, 716–732. doi:10.1108/JSBED-10-2016-0153
  • Garud, R., & Rappa, M. A. (1994). A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organization Science, 5, 344–362. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.3.344
  • Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management, 32, 926–950. doi:10.1177/0149206306293860
  • Giotopoulos, I., Kontolaimou, A., Korra, E., & Tsakanikas, A. (2017). What drives ICT adoption by SMEs? Evidence from a large-scale survey in Greece. Journal of Business Research, 81, 60–69. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.007
  • The Global Competitiveness Index Report. (2018). Retrieved from: http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2018/ the-global-competitiveness-report-2018/
  • Griffiths, A., & Zammuto, R. F. (2005). Institutional governance systems and variations in national competitive advantage: An integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 30, 823–842. doi:10.5465/amr.2005.18378880
  • Haeussler, C., Patzelt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2012). Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 217–233. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.10.002
  • Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26, 33–52.
  • Hempell, T., & Zwick, T. (2008). New technology, work organisation, and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17, 331–354. doi:10.1080/10438590701279649
  • Heugens, P. P., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! (and Other Quarrels): A Meta-Analysis of Institutional Theories of Organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 61–85. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.36461835
  • Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28, 52–61. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
  • Ho, Y.-P., & Wong, P.-K. (2007). Financing, regulatory costs and entrepreneurial propensity. Small Business Economics, 28, 187–204. doi:10.1007/s11187-006-9015-0
  • Holmes, R. M., Zahra, S. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Deghetto, K., & Sutton, T. (2016). Twoway streets: The role of institutions and technology policy in firms’ corporate entrepreneurship and political strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30, 247–272. doi:10.5465/amp.2015.0136
  • Hopp, C., & Sonderegger, R. (2015). Understanding the dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship-prestart-up experience, intentions, and entrepreneurial success. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 1076–1096. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12107
  • Hoskisson, R. E., Covin, J., Volberda, H. W., & Johnson, R. A. (2011). Revitalizing entrepreneurship: The search for new research opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1141–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00997.x
  • Howard, J. A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 367–393. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.367
  • Institutions and Organizations. (2001). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 467–487. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3
  • Jean, R. J. B., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2010). Relationship learning and performance enhancement via advanced information technology. International Marketing Review, 27, 200–222. doi:10.1108/02651331011037520
  • Jennings, P. D., Greenwood, R., Lounsbury, M. D., & Suddaby, R. (2013). Institutions, entrepreneurs, and communities: A special issue on entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.07.001
  • Jones, M. V., Coviello, N., & Tang, Y. K. (2011). International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 632–659. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.001
  • Kane, G. C., & Alavi, M. (2007). Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organization Science, 18, 796–812. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0286
  • Karahanna, E., Evaristo, J. R., & Srite, M. (2005). Levels of culture and individual behavior: An investigative perspective. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 13, 1–20. doi:10.4018/JGIM
  • Karanja, E., & Bhatt, G. D. (2014). The role of IT investments in fostering firm innovations: an empirical study. Journal of Business and Management, 20, 25–50.
  • Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 591–629. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.006
  • Kleis, L., Chwelos, P., Ramirez, R. V., & Cockburn, I. (2012). Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Information Systems Research, 23, 42–59. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0338
  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411–432. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0
  • Laplume, A. O., Pathak, S., & Xavier-Oliveira, E. (2014). The politics of intellectual property rights regimes: An empirical study of new technology use in entrepreneurship. Technovation, 34, 807–816. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.006
  • Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31, 235–263. doi:10.1007/s11187-008-9136-8
  • Levy, M., Powell, P., & Yetton, P. (2001). SMEs: aligning IS and the strategic context. Journal of Information Technology, 16, 133–144. doi:10.1080/02683960110063672
  • Lim, D. S. K., Oh, C. H., & De Clercq, D. (2016). Engagement in entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Interactive effects of individual-level factors and institutional conditions. International Business Review, 25, 933–945. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.12.001
  • Lopez-Nicolas, C., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2010). Analyzing ICT adoption and use effects on knowledge creation: An empirical investigation in SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 521–528. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.03.004
  • Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories. legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
  • Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32, 203–218.
  • McKelvie, A., Haynie, J. M., & Gustavsson, V. (2011). Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 273–292. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.004
  • McKelvie, A., Wiklund, J., & Brattström, A. (2018). Externally acquired or internally generated? Knowledge development and perceived environmental dynamism in new venture innovation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42, 24–46. doi:10.1177/1042258717747056
  • McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31, 132–152. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379628
  • Miller, T., Holmes, K. R., & Feulner, E. J. (2012). Index of economic freedom. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and Dow Jones & Company.
  • Mitchell, R. K., Smith, B., Seawright, K. W., & Morse, E. A. (2000). Cross-cultural cognitions and the venture creation decision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 974–993.
  • Morgan, A., Colebourne, D., & Thomas, B. (2006). The development of ICT advisors for sme businesses: An innovative approach. Technovation, 26, 980–987. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.001
  • Munir, K. A. (2002). Being different: How normative and cognitive aspects of institutional environments influence technology transfer. Human Relations, 55, 1403–1428. doi:10.1177/001872602128782204
  • Nambisan, S. (2013). Information technology and product/service innovation: A brief assessment and some suggestions for future research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 215–226. doi:10.17705/1jais
  • Nguyen, T. H., Newby, M., & Macaulay, M. J. (2015). Information technology adoption in small business: Confirmation of a proposed framework. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 207–227. doi:10.1111/jsbm.2015.53.issue-1
  • Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 697–713. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
  • Parboteeah, K. P., Hoegl, M., & Cullen, J. B. (2008). “managers’ gender role attitudes: acountry institutional profile approach”. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 795–813. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400384
  • Parente, S. L., & Prescott, E. C. (1994). Barriers to technology adoption and development. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 298–321. doi:10.1086/261933
  • Parida, V., & Örtqvist, D. (2015). Interactive effects of network capability, ICT capability, and financial slack on technology-based small firm innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 278–298. doi:10.1111/jsbm.2015.53.issue-s1
  • Pathak, S., Xavier-Oliveira, E., & Laplume, A. O. (2013). Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 66, 2090–2101. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.035
  • Peterman, N. E., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28, 129–144.
  • Phan, P. H. (2004). Entrepreneurship theory: Possibilities and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 617–620. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.09.001
  • Polo Peña, A. I., Frías Jamilena, D. M., & Rodríguez Molina, M. Á. (2011). Impact of market orientation and ICT on the performance of rural smaller service enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 49, 331–360. doi:10.1111/jsbm.2011.49.issue-3
  • Real, J. C., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2006). Information technology as a determinant of organizational learning and technological distinctive competencies. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 505–521. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.004
  • Regulatory Burden, Rule of Law, and Entry of Strategic Entrepreneurs: An International Panel Study (2011). Journal of Management Studies 48 1392–1419.
  • Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., de Bono, N., Servais, I., … Chin, N. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24, 205–231. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-1980-1
  • Sala-i-Martín, X., Bilbao-Osorio, B., Blanke, J., Crotti, R., Hanouz, M. D., Geiger, T., & Ko, C. (2012). “The global competitiveness index 2012–2013: Strengthening recovery by raising productivity,” The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013, 49–68.
  • Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509–532. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3
  • Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (2000). Research commentary: The organizing logic for an enterprise’s IT activities in the digital era—A prognosis of practice and a call for research. Information Systems Research, 11, 105–114. doi:10.1287/isre.11.2.105.11780
  • Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information and Management, 44, 90–103. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
  • Schillo, R., Persaud, A., & Jin, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial readiness in the context of national systems of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 46, 619–637. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9709-x
  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs Is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33, 141–149. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5
  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.
  • Sin Tan, K., Choy Chong, S., Lin, B., & Cyril Eze, U. (2010). Internet-based ICT adoption among smes: demographic versus benefits, barriers, and adoption intention. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23, 27–55. doi:10.1108/17410391011008897
  • Siqueira, A. C. O., & Bruton, G. D. (2010). High-technology entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Firm informality and contextualization of resource-based theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57, 39–50. doi:10.1109/TEM.2009.2028323
  • Smeets, R., & De Vaal, A. (2016). Intellectual property rights and the productivity effects of MNE affiliates on host-country firms. International Business Review, 25, 419–434. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.08.004
  • Spencer, J. W., & Gómez, C. (2004). The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: A multicountry study. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1098–1107. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00040-7
  • Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30, 679–704. doi:10.2307/25148745
  • Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., Weaver, K. M., & Dickson, P. H. (2000). The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 951–973.
  • Stenholm, P. (2011). Innovative behavior as a moderator of growth intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 49, 233–251. doi:10.1111/jsbm.2011.49.issue-2
  • Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 176–193. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.002
  • Stoneman, P., & Kwon, M. J. (1996). Technology adoption and firm profitability. The Economic Journal, 106, 952–962. doi:10.2307/2235366
  • Sussman, N. M. (2000). The dynamic nature of cultural identity throughout cultural transitions: Why home is not so sweet. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 355–373. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_5
  • Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., & Lindgren, R. (2017). Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quarterly, 41, 239–253. doi:10.25300/MISQ
  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
  • Thornton, P. H. (1999). The Sociology of Entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 19–46. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.19
  • Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24, 745–761. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
  • Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., & Huo, Y. J. (2000). Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 1138. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.6.4.1138
  • Urbano, D., & Alvarez, C. (2014). Institutional Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Activity: An International Study. Small Business Economics, 42, 703–716. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9523-7
  • Valdez, M. E., & Richardson, J. (2013). Institutional determinants of macro-level entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37, 1149–1175.
  • Van De Ven, A. H. (2017). The innovation journey: you can’t control it, but you can learn to maneuver it. Innovation: Management Policy and Practice, 19, 39–42. doi:10.1080/14479338.2016.1256780
  • Van Stel, A., Storey, D. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28, 171–186. doi:10.1007/s11187-006-9014-1
  • Verona, G. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 132–142. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1580445
  • Von Briel, F., Davidsson, P., & Recker, J. (2018). Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42, 47–69. doi:10.1177/1042258717732779
  • Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 541–567. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.005
  • Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 57–65.
  • The World Bank. 2012. Doing Business 2012. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/855841468331214799/ Highlights-from-the-IFC-annual-report-2012
  • Yoon, H., Kim, N., Buisson, B., & Phillips, F. (2018). A cross-national study of knowledge, government intervention, and innovative nascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 84, 243–252. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.040
  • Yousafzai, S. Y., Saeed, S., & Muffatto, M. (2015). Institutional theory and contextual embeddedness of women’s entrepreneurial leadership: Evidence from 92 Countries. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 587–604. doi:10.1111/jsbm.2015.53.issue-3
  • Yunis, M., El-Kassar, A.-N., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Impact of ICT-based innovations on organizational performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30, 122–141. doi:10.1108/JEIM-01-2016-0040
  • Zietsma, C., Groenewegen, P., Logue, D. M., & Hinings, C. (2017). Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 391–450. doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0052

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.