Planners’ Role in Creating Family-Friendly Communities: Action, Participation and Resistance

REFERENCES

• American Farmland Trust. (2007). Cost of community services studies. Northampton, MA: American Farmland Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. (2006). Planning for child care in California. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, S. (2002). Building better cities with children and youth. Environment and Urbanization, 14, 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartik, T. (2011). Investing in kids. Kalamazoo, MI: UpJohn Institute for Employment Research.
   Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2003). Youth participation in community evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1): 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopherson, S., & Rightor, N. (2009). The creative economy as “big business”: Evaluating state strategies to lure filmmakers. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29, 336–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T. N. (2004). The city as an entertainment machine. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Committee for Economic Development (CED). (2006). The economic promise of investing in high-quality preschool: Using early education to improve economic growth and the fiscal sustainability of states and the nation. Washington, DC: Committee for Economic Development. Available at http://www.ced.org/docs/report/report_prek_econpromise.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dear, M. (2007). Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 288–300.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (2004). Growth management and affordable housing: Do they conflict? Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, D. (2002) Creating better cities with children and youth: A participatory manual. London: UNESCO /Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. (2010). Forecasting government revenue and expenditure in the U.S. using data on age-specific utilization. Working Paper # WP10–01, National Transfer Accounts Project.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2008). Who’s your city? How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, K. I. (2006). The potential of youth participation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, W. H., & Berube, A. (2002). City families and suburban singles: An emerging household story from Census 2000. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2002/02demographics.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ghazaleh R. A., Greenhouse, E., Homsy, G., & Warner, M. (2011). Using smart growth and universal design to link the needs of children and the aging population. APA Briefing Paper. Available at http://www.planning.org/research/family/briefingpapers/multigenerational.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, R., & O’Brien, C. (2009). Child and youth friendly land use and transport planning: Planning guidelines for Ontario. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada: Center for Sustainable Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, J. (2009). How much do we spend on children and the elderly? Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, E., & Warner, M. E. (2008). Planning for family friendly communities. PAS Memo. American Planning Association. Available at http://www.planning.org/pas/memo/open/nov2008/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Juergensmeyer, J. C., & Roberts, T. E. (2007). Exclusionary and inclusionary zoning. In Land Use Planning and Development Regulation Law § 6.1 (2d ed.). St. Paul, MN: Thomson West.
   Google Scholar
• Kihl, M., Brennan, D., List, J., Gabhawala, N., & Mittal, P. (2005). Livable communities: An evaluation guide. Washington, DC: AARP.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, G., Meck, S., Moore, T., & Parker, R. (2008). Zoning as a barrier to multifamily housing development. PAS Report 548. Washington, DC: American Planning Association. Available at http://www.huduser.org/portal/publications/polleg/zoning_MultifmlyDev.html
   Google Scholar
• Knowles-Yánez, K. L. (2005). Children’s participation in planning processes. Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochera, A., Straight, A., & Guterbock, T. (2005). Beyond 50.05: A report to the nation on livable communities: Creating environments for successful aging. Washington, DC: AARP.
   Google Scholar
• Kudva, N., & Driskell, D. (2009). Creating space for participation: The role of organizational practice in structuring youth participation. Community Development, 40, 367–380.
   Google Scholar
• Laplante, J. E., & McCann, B. (2008). Complete streets: We can get there from here. ITE Journal. Available at http://www.completestreets.org/documents/CompleteStreets_ITEMay2008.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local Investment in Child Care (LINCC). (2008). Building child care into new developments. Oakland, CA.: LINCC. Available at www.lincc-childcare.com.
   Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2003). Children’s common grounds. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 130–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Sideris, A. (2010). What brings children to the park? Analysis and measurement of the variables affecting children’s use of parks. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 89–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & Gadwa, A. (2010). Arts and culture in urban or regional planning: A review and research agenda, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29, 379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, N. (2010). School siting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 184–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoy, D. L., & Vincent, J. M. (2007). Engaging schools in urban revitalization: The Y-plan (Youth – Plan, Learn, Act, Now!). Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 389–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoy, D. L., Vincent, J. M., & Bierbaum, A. H. (2011). Opportunity rich schools and sustainable communities. Berkeley, CA: Center for Cities and Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Morrissey, T., and Warner, M. E. (2007). Why early care and education deserves as much attention, or more, than prekindergarten alone. Applied Developmental Science, 11(2), 57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D. (2007). Immigrants and boomers: Forging a new social contract for the future of America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nacker, R. (2005, February). Child care and economic development: Results of survey of economic developers in Wisconsin. Paper presented at the Strongest Links Conference, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Obrinsky, M., & Stein, D. (2007). Overcoming opposition to multifamily rental housing. Washington, DC: National Multi Housing Council. Retrieved April 10, 2012, from http://www.nmhc.org/Content/ServeFile.cfm?FileID=5717
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Primerano, F., Taylor, M., Pitaksringkarn, L., & Tisato, P. (2007). Defining and understanding trip chaining behaviour. Transportation, 35(1), 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, K. M. (1999). Promoting community development through empowerment planning in East St. Louis, Illinois. In W. D. Keating & N. Krumholz (Eds.), America’s poorest urban neighborhoods: Urban policy and planning (pp. 124–139) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, L. (2012). Creative class or procreative class: Implications for local economic development. Theoretical and Empirical Research in Urban Management (February), 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, L. (2004). Taxes, fees, assessments, dues and the “get what you pay for” model of local government. Florida Law Review, 56, 373–441.
   Google Scholar
• Riggio, E. (2002). Child friendly cities: Good governance in the best interests of the child. Environment and Urbanization, 14, 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., & Watson, H. L. (Eds.). (2007). Chasing the American dream: New perspectives on affordable homeownership. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rolnick, A. J., & Grunewald, R. (2003). Early childhood development: Economic development with a high public return. Fedgazette (March), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner, J. (2012). Public knowing of risk and children’s independent mobility. Progress in Planning, 78, 1–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rukus, J., & Warner, M. E. (2013). Crime rates and collective efficacy: The role of family friendly planning. Cities, 31, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneekloth, L. H., & Shibley, R. G. (1995). Placemaking: The art and practice of building communities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spengler, J. O., Young, S. J., & Linton, L. S. (2007). Schools as a community resource for physical activity: Legal considerations for decision makers. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21, 390–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2004). Building child friendly cities: A framework for action. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, International Secretariat for Child Friendly Cities.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. (2006). Putting child care in the regional economy: Empirical and conceptual challenges and economic development prospects. Community Development, 37(2), 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. (2007). Child care and economic development: Markets, households and public policy. International Journal of Economic Development, 9(3), 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Baran-Rees, R. (2012). The economic importance of families with children. Issue Brief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of City and Regional Planning. Available at http://economicdevelopmentandchildcare.org/documents/publications/185.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Gradus, R. (2011). The consequences of implementing a child care voucher: Evidence from Australia, the Netherlands and USA. Social Policy and Administration, 45, 569–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Liu, Z. (2006). The importance of child care in economic development: A comparative analysis of regional economic linkage. Economic Development Quarterly, 20, 97–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Morken, L. (2013). Building child and age friendly communities in tight fiscal times. In The Municipal Year Book 2013 (pp. 47–56). Washington, DC: International City County Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Prentice, S. (2013). Regional economic development and child care: Toward social rights. Journal of Urban Affairs. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9906.2012.00622.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Zheng, L. (2013). Business incentive adoption in the recession. In Economic Development Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0891242413479140.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, G., & Steele, W. (2008). Child-friendly community indicators: A literature review. Queensland, AU: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Zuberi, A. (2010). Limited exposure: Children’s activities and neighborhood effects in the Gautreaux Two Housing Mobility program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32, 405–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar